TripleATeam
G.O.A.T.
His back could go out at any moment, but I thought the chances of that were less than 2.5%. Calculated risk, thought it was acceptable. Of course, it could definitely be better for a "safe" pick. You could get a much bigger return.yes, but it's easy to say I was right after the fact. Risking 40,000 isn't worth it betting on a 36 year old who's back could go out like it did in the final against zverev last year. risk/reward not worth it.
However, I did call it. If people who call an upset and get it right can be applauded for their foresight, so should people who call safe picks and get them right in the face of adversity. I'm not asking to be applauded, just not to be told it's hindsight to pick a near-sure thing.