AntonZweck
Rookie
Should they announce simultaneously or consecutively at AO (Novak), at Roland Garros (Rafa) and at Wimbledon (Roger) their respective retirements provided they are able to address the business side of their endorsement entities?
They absolutely enjoy hoisting the trophies, they just hated the losses, and find it especially tough to swallow when injuries hindered them from collecting more.They should retire when they no longer enjoy competing.
Federer won't be winning Wimbledon, at this stage it's not even a certainty he'll be playing at it. His retirement will come first, I believe.Or the trio of them could each collect their 21st titles at their pet grand slam (AO for Nole, RG for Rafa, and Wimbledon for Roger) and retire.
Roger is 100% finished. Rafa will retire if he can’t win RG 22. Novak will retire if he can’t win any slams in 22. Possibly earlier if he gets humiliated by the young guns.Should they announce simultaneously or consecutively at AO (Novak), at Roland Garros (Rafa) and at Wimbledon (Roger) their respective retirements provided they are able to address the business side of their endorsement entities?
Federer won't be winning Wimbledon, at this stage it's not even a certainty he'll be playing at it. His retirement will come first, I believe.
I think Djokovic and Rafa will both be aiming for at least getting to 21 next year.
Roger is 100% finished. Rafa will retire if he can’t win RG 22. Novak will retire if he can’t win any slams in 22. Possibly earlier if he gets humiliated by the young guns.
My heart wants them to play forever. I love to hate Novak and secretly pull for Fed (which feels like treason, but I've grown to appreciate his game so much more as he ages) as I root for Rafa. But it's just won't be the same when they're all gone.
But my head knows this is the beginning of the end. It would be fantastic if they all ended with the Slam count. The conversation would never, ever stop. But it won't. Novak will win 2-4 more, Rafa one more.
If they all retired on 20 Majors that suits Federer and Nadal for sure. their respective Wimbledon and French Open records will sway thigs their way.Should they announce simultaneously or consecutively at AO (Novak), at Roland Garros (Rafa) and at Wimbledon (Roger) their respective retirements provided they are able to address the business side of their endorsement entities?
Bear in mind, Novak is six years younger, a little over one tennis generation younger than Federer. Remember years and years ago, people thought Rafa was done with his bum knee?Djokovic should outlast Federer in terms of longevity ... physically at least.
However one might slice it, they will be in the same conversation because of their exact sum totals in the grand slams. Twenty is twenty.If they all retired on 20 Majors that suits Federer and Nadal for sure. their respective Wimbledon and French Open records will sway thigs their way.
Yes but popularity would then over time dictate who is remembered as the Greatest. Federer probably would end up with he crown as Wimbledon is the biggest Major. Then again in 20 years AO may be the biggest so who really knows.However one might slice it, they will be in the same conversation because of their exact sum totals in the grand slams. Twenty is twenty.
What makes you think they would like to retire with the slam record in a triple tie, when they think they have a chance to break it?Should they announce simultaneously or consecutively at AO (Novak), at Roland Garros (Rafa) and at Wimbledon (Roger) their respective retirements provided they are able to address the business side of their endorsement entities?
Because perhaps they don't want to succumb their bodies to further breakdowns, they can still enjoy other sports at their leisure that they've put on hold so as to prolong their respective careers? More importantly, the record of a three way tie at 20 slams apiece would be all that much harder to break.What makes you think they would like to retire with the slam record in a triple tie, when they think they have a chance to break it?
AO is already the fan favorite. In terms of prestige, it's another story, but then, Rafa's 13 RGs is still 4 more than Nole's AO and 5 more than Roger's Wimbledon.Yes but popularity would then over time dictate who is remembered as the Greatest. Federer probably would end up with he crown as Wimbledon is the biggest Major. Then again in 20 years AO may be the biggest so who really knows.
Should they announce simultaneously or consecutively at AO (Novak), at Roland Garros (Rafa) and at Wimbledon (Roger) their respective retirements provided they are able to address the business side of their endorsement entities?
Absolutely not, just hinting he might be less motivated going the extra mile by just telling himself he will get them the next time (but that next time keeps on piling) since Rafa and Roger are no longer in the picture.Why would Novak retire at 34? Other than the fact you don't want him to break 20GS titles record?
Or they could all agree to soldier on and wait up till every one of them collect their 21st grand slam.Walking hand in hand, towards a sunset?
Who's in the middle? Nadal? That could work. Also maybe riding a...not tandem bike but whatever a three person bike is called.Walking hand in hand, towards a sunset?