Dimitrov, Harrison, Raonic, and Tomic

[Mongoose7]

All of these guys are either looking good right now (Grisha, Harry, and Bernie) or have looked really good in the past (Raonic). Who's the best or gonna be the best?

http://tenngrand.com/2013/01/09/the...ll-things-dimitrov-harrison-raonic-and-tomic/

 

[forzamilan90]

Raonic is the best now. Dimitrov if improves on inconsistencies has a high ceiling in terms of potential. I am bit biased towards him, but I think he'll have the best career out of them when it's all said and done

 

[joeri888]

Harrison is not really in the same league as the other three imo. I think Tomic is wasting his talent a little atm. Raonic is already very good, but little room for improvement. I think Raonic, Dimitrov and Tomic are all future top 5. Tomic only if he gets his head straight.

 

[tacou]

c'mon dozens of these threads floating around.

Dimitrov bowed out of Sydney on purpose while Harrison looked real good against Isner with some crazy touch volleys and beautiful, controlling ground strokes.

Haven't seen Tomic yet but he's already won a few matches. Haven't heard of Raonic at all except he was upset in first round somewhere? He should have stuck to Chennai

 

[SwankPeRFection]

Tomic needs to go to racing school and just drive cars. lol He likes speeding way too much.

I'm sticking with my guy... Dimitrov.

 

[Sid_Vicious]

Raonic is the best now. Dimitrov if improves on inconsistencies has a high ceiling in terms of potential. I am bit biased towards him, but I think he'll have the best career out of them when it's all said and done

Dimitrov gets a lot of hype for being "Baby Federer", but I think there is nothing about his game that indicates that he has higher potential than Raonic. Raonic and Dimitrov are both good from the baseline (although nowhere close to elite level with Djokovic, Murray, Federer), are both below average movers.. but Raonic has a huge edge because his serve is a massive weapon.

With that said, Tomic is the only one who has shown that he can reach deep into a slam and give a top player hell in a grand slam match.

Harrison still needs some catching up to do.

 

[tacou]

Harrison is not really in the same league as the other three imo. I think Tomic is wasting his talent a little atm. Raonic is already very good, but little room for improvement. I think Raonic, Dimitrov and Tomic are all future top 5. Tomic only if he gets his head straight.

I respect your opinion of course, but where do you get this? Other than Raonic's serve I don't think any of them have really distinguished themselves.

Raonic and Tomic have had 1 good slam each, but neither have backed it up at all. I think Dimitrov and Harrison's games (skills, not style) are very similar.

I really think it's impossible to forecast how they will do in future majors because in 3-4 years time all these old guys are in the top 100 are going to be gone and at least a couple of these young guns will seize the chance to win some slams.

Who will step up? I don't know to answer that.

 

[Mike Sams]

Nishikori is very injury prone

 

[Steve0904]

c'mon dozens of these threads floating around.

Dimitrov bowed out of Sydney on purpose while Harrison looked real good against Isner with some crazy touch volleys and beautiful, controlling ground strokes.

Haven't seen Tomic yet but he's already won a few matches. Haven't heard of Raonic at all except he was upset in first round somewhere? He should have stuck to Chennai

Raonic has lost to Dimitrov in Brisbane and just today lost to Hewitt at Kooyong. Being Canadian, the Dimitrov loss doesn't concern me, but he should be beating Hewitt consistently now I think, regardless of where it is or whether it's an exo or not.

As it stands, I think Dimitrov has the most potential, but that means little until he uses it, and I don't except him to have a Fed like career or anything. If he can get 1% of that he'll do alright.

 

[forzamilan90]

Dimitrov gets a lot of hype for being "Baby Federer", but I think there is nothing about his game that indicates that he has higher potential than Raonic. Raonic and Dimitrov are both good from the baseline (although nowhere close to elite level with Djokovic, Murray, Federer), are both below average movers.. but Raonic has a huge edge because his serve is a massive weapon.

With that said, Tomic is the only one who has shown that he can reach deep into a slam and give a top player hell in a grand slam match.

Harrison still needs some catching up to do.

The reason I think Dimitrov has a high potential level is because his serve, forehand and backhand are very good and could potentially turn elite. Love the way he is hitting the ball. I like drop shots as well. He used to play more and resemble Fed more back in the day, nowadays it's clear he is trying to refine his game (not to mention he got taller since the comparisons first started). Movement and balance are something he lacks imo,but then again not everybody moves like the top four. Raonic has a massive serve which wins matches, but if Dimitrov keeps on doing what he's doing (it's obvious he is improving) he will be a very complete player

 

[Wilander Fan]

I dont see many areas Raonic can improve on as he pretty much plays a high level of his brand of tennis. He is not going to become a nimble baseline rabbit. Maybe he improves his tactics and shot selection. Anyway, he has the tools to be a top 10 player.

Dimitrov has the most potential I think. His footwork has improved alot. He just needs to work on fitness. He can be a top 5 player.

Tomic has an interesting game but its essentially a grinding game. He doesnt seem to have the patience to do it ever day.

Nishikori may break into the top 5 before any of the others but his body is already breaking down.

Goffin looks pretty interesting. Quick, great footwork, composed and a big forehand.

I dont think Harrison can be mentioned with the others yet as he hasnt really done anything.

 

[PrincessAdam]

I've been with Dimitrov for awhile now. He has the most potential of any of them. Harrison is good, but he is kinda maxed out at a top 20 player. Raonic is having very good results, he will have a good consistent career. Tomic.... What a shame. I actually liked his game, but he needs to mature big time.

 

[joeri888]

I respect your opinion of course, but where do you get this? Other than Raonic's serve I don't think any of them have really distinguished themselves.

Raonic and Tomic have had 1 good slam each, but neither have backed it up at all. I think Dimitrov and Harrison's games (skills, not style) are very similar.

I really think it's impossible to forecast how they will do in future majors because in 3-4 years time all these old guys are in the top 100 are going to be gone and at least a couple of these young guns will seize the chance to win some slams.

Who will step up? I don't know to answer that.

I get this from the fact that there is nobody else. In 4 or 5 years, there's got to be someone. Maybe top 5 was a bit much, but top 10 sure

 

[Sid_Vicious]

I've been with Dimitrov for awhile now. He has the most potential of any of them. Harrison is good, but he is kinda maxed out at a top 20 player. Raonic is having very good results, he will have a good consistent career. Tomic.... What a shame. I actually liked his game, but he needs to mature big time.

Why is this always Tomic's problem? As if Dimitrov and Harrison are consummate professionals, right? Please, these guys are not very sharp either. Dimitrov is far from a competitor and frequently loses matches to players that people expect him to win against.

 

[PrincessAdam]

Why is this always Tomic's problem? As if Dimitrov and Harrison are consummate professionals, right? Please, these guys are not very sharp either. Dimitrov is far from a competitor and frequently loses matches to players that people expect him to win against.

A lot of young payers have this problem, but do you see Ryan speeding a sports car after losing out in the Australian Open? No. It'd be nice to see Tomic change, but most likely he won't. Its a part of his personality. Yeah "Showtime" Grigor is flashy and immature on court sometimes, but he is nowhere near the likes of Tomic in this matter.

 

[Sid_Vicious]

A lot of young payers have this problem, but do you see Ryan speeding a sports car after losing out in the Australian Open? No. It'd be nice to see Tomic change, but most likely he won't. Its a part of his personality. Yeah "Showtime" Grigor is flashy and immature on court sometimes, but he is nowhere near the likes of Tomic in this matter.

If people in the US gave a damn about Harrison we would have known everything about his private life by now. The fact is, Harrison is not a big star over here and can keep a relatively low profile.

Tomic can act like an ass, no doubt about that, but he is pretty much stalked by people in the Australia. Every time he says something stupid, it gets published right away on the internet. He is a topic of interest in Australia. Look at how many Aussie stars are invested in his career: Hewitt, Newcombe, Roche, Rafter , Cash etc. It is a big deal to them.

Harrison is pretty damn cocky and he can behave even worse on court than Tomic. Thankfully, he does not have the paparazzi following him around off-court to record his every move.

 

[Amelie Mauresmo]

I respect Milos Raonic the most he is the most mature and poised he doesn't act like a big baby on the court like Ryan Harrison and he doesn't do stupid things off the court like Bernard Tomic.


Tomic is very talented but I see him as a young man with so much pressure. The Australian media come across as extremely mean spirited and cruel to the kid. The attacks from Patrick Rafter, Samantha Stosur ect. about Tomic character is out of line and extreme.These people seem to forget what it means to be 20 years old. Tomic isn't doing drugs or murdering anybody he is just adjusting to his fame. Also, Tomic's father is also difficult imagine having a parent breathing down your neck and putting so much pressure on you. I see Tomic as a young man adjusting to a lot of pain going on in his life that people probably don't see from the outside. I feel bad for Tomic he doesn't deserve the negativity and bigotry and grief he gets.


Milos is extremely mature and very mentally tough he believes in himself and he lets his racket do the talking. The Canadian media are proud of media not just the way he handles himself on the court but also how he acts off the court.

One thing I noticed reading articles on American tennis websites is their back handed comments and jealousy about Milos Raonic success because he's Canadian. The Canadian government deserves a lot of respect for finally putting money into tennis and now Canada are developing good talented young players like Eugenie Bouchard and Fillip Peliwo.

I actually think the American kid Ryan Harrison is the worst in terms of talent and his attitude. I have seen Harrison play a few times and his game looks basic to me. Nothing about Harrison's game seems extraordinary or special that stands out. Harrison's backhand is crap, his forehand is okay, his serve is decent but not a big weapon. The most important thing Harrison needs to improve is his attitude he acts like he is a tennis star probably because the USA media make this kid think he is one. However, Harrison does NOT have the results yet to justify this kind of bratty star attitude he has.

Grigor Dimtrov he's definitely extremely talented but he seems more interested in celebrity than in being a good tennis player. Grigor had an excellent result in Brisbane making the final so maybe this year his results will improve on the court. Grigor has to remember, hype is only going to take a guy so far eventually he needs the results.

 

[Timbo's hopeless slice]

don't forget Tomic and Harrison are over two years younger than the others..

makes a difference at that age.

Tomic seems to have matured on court at least, as has Harrison (who could be a bit of a train wreck out there in the past)

Off court, who knows? I'm not sure it really matters, actually..

 

[Gonzo_style]

2013 is crucial for them. IMO Raonic has the most potential...

 

[rossi46]

Raonic is ridiculously overrated. Harrison, why bother ? Dimitrov and Tomic are by far and away the most talented of this group. Tomic is a lot more confident and cocky than Dimitrov, helps to have that at such an age. Despite Dimitrov having a "prettier" game than Tomic, the Aussie has a more mature game and is a better thinker on the court. If Tomic can get it together he will go a long way, further than the others in this group.

 

[Duncan Bell]

Agree Raonic is overrated, not sure I see it with him.

Dimi definitely the most potential, but can also seem him going nowhere this year - 2013 is big for him. Needs to get off to a good start in the AO

 

[Jeffrey573639]

I think Raonic and Harrison have the least potential and have games which have been proven time and again to not be world class material. Raonic - massive serve, big forehand, terrible movement ala Isner + 0.5
Harrison is a bit like Roddick but his forehand serve are nowhere near Arod's. Dimmy has good strokes but poor balance and average movement. Tomic has prbly the best overall game stroke by stroke now that he's improved his serve and he moves decent for a guy his size. For him it's all mental and off court stuff ala speeding tickets

 

[Candide]

I've watched all of these guys' matches (except Harrison) in Oz in the last week or so. Raonic lost to Hewitt and Fognini but he beat himself essentially with a lack of composure. Still needs to get his head together. His forehand is fearsome and as potent as his serve. He is a contender but not this year.

Tomic has really retooled his game and gotten rid of 90% of the dicky shots he was pulling. Serving immensely better and hitting clean winners out of the forehand regularly. He is going to do some damage this year. He's still a obnoxious donkey though so it's not pennance to watch him lose.

Dimitrov has steadied a lot and gave Murray a good fright in Brisbane. His game is not only pretty but also effective. Like Raonic he beats himself a fair bit with poor shot selection or turning the volume up to eleven at the wrong time. His recent tank job was pretty disappointing but overall he's my favourite for aesthetic reasons.

Tomic is probably poised to do best in the short term for the very arrogance and cockiness mentioned earlier coupled with a more solid, ruthless approach to his matches. I don't enjoy saying that but that's how I saw it.

 

[always_crosscourt]

When Dimitrov slides around at the baseline, I can't help thinking he's trying to make it more dramatic for the spectators, same as sometimes when Djokovic does the splits when he could have simply taken an extra step towards the ball and hit a normal shot.

They're both showmen.

 

[Jeffrey573639]

I don't give a cr@p about anyone's personality on the court. If I liked the game of a pro-tennis racist serial killer, I wouldn't give a cr@p he was a racist serial killer - I'd still be a fan.

With that said, Raonic probably has the most potential. I absolutely hate his game with his awkward movement, mechanical strokes, and dull, unimaginative tactics - but if you have a serve that big you can get very far.

Isner has a big serve and he hasn't exactly launched has he?

 

[Duncan Bell]

Karlovic

10

 

[forzamilan90]

Karlovic

10

That's what I am talking. True respect

 

[pound cat]

I watched the 3 matches Raonic played in Kooyong (Fognini, Dodic, Hewitt) and his play was not up to pat. Errors on both sides, the serve was erratic and being picked up frequently by the opponents, no net play, no running around on the court. He looked generally out of sorts and lethargic..even sad as he sat during changeovers). Was it the heat, has tennis lost it appeal, does he need another coach ASAP? Anyone else watch him play?

 

[Rock Strongo]

I watched the 3 matches Raonic played in Kooyong (Fognini, Dodic, Hewitt) and his play was not up to pat. Errors on both sides, the serve was erratic and being picked up frequently by the opponents, no net play, no running around on the court. He looked generally out of sorts and lethargic..even sad as he sat during changeovers). Was it the heat, has tennis lost it appeal, does he need another coach ASAP? Anyone else watch him play?

I saw his match against Dodig or at least part of it, and I was a bit surprised how much he struggled on the serve.

I think he needs Brad Gilbert.

 

[Jeffrey573639]

I watched the 3 matches Raonic played in Kooyong (Fognini, Dodic, Hewitt) and his play was not up to pat. Errors on both sides, the serve was erratic and being picked up frequently by the opponents, no net play, no running around on the court. He looked generally out of sorts and lethargic..even sad as he sat during changeovers). Was it the heat, has tennis lost it appeal, does he need another coach ASAP? Anyone else watch him play?

I saw him against Fabio and he certainly looked all over the place. Racking up massive amounts of UE and his body language was....Well it wasn't negative just lethargic almost Tomic like when he was down.

 

[dominikk1985]

I think dimitrov will have a good career.

tomic is certainly the most naturally talented of those 4 guys. he is extremely intelligent on the court and knows where to hit the ball.

however his strokes and movement are often sloppy. his serve is terrible technically and he needs to get stronger.

 

[veroniquem]

Raonic has won 3 titles (+ 3 finals) and is # 15. What has Dimitrov ever done? (and they're almost the same age) I don't understand why people rate Dimitrov so high.

 

[aussie]

I think dimitrov will have a good career.

tomic is certainly the most naturally talented of those 4 guys. he is extremely intelligent on the court and knows where to hit the ball.

however his strokes and movement are often sloppy. his serve is terrible technically and he needs to get stronger.

Yes tend to agree with this. Watching the match with Seppi yesterday, Todd Woodbridge remarked that of all the players he speaks to and interviews, Tomic can analyse other players games better than anyone he has met. According to Woodbridge, Tomic has a great ability to tactically devise the right plan to play most players on tour. Whether he can actually do that of course is reliant on many other factors.

Tomic will no doubt become stronger as he matures into his still lanky frame but this may come at the cost of ability to cover the court. His placement of the serve is greatly improved and he is showing a greater maturity in shot selection - still tends to go for the showy drop shot winner instead of a bread and butter putaway, but definitely Tomic 2013 is a better model than Tomic 2012.

If only he had the heart of Hewitt and the good guy niceness of Rafter, Australia would really have a player they could love!!

 

[Sid_Vicious]

Isner has a big serve and he hasn't exactly launched has he?

Not a very strong argument. Just because they both have huge serves does not mean Isner=Raonic. Raonic is much more impressive than Isner because he is not a complete giant like Isner (he is like 5 inches shorter than Isner) yet he has a serve that is just as potent (possibly even more) than Isner's. The movement is not even comparable, Raonic is a much greater mover than Isner.

 

[dominikk1985]

Yes tend to agree with this. Watching the match with Seppi yesterday, Todd Woodbridge remarked that of all the players he speaks to and interviews, Tomic can analyse other players games better than anyone he has met. According to Woodbridge, Tomic has a great ability to tactically devise the right plan to play most players on tour. Whether he can actually do that of course is reliant on many other factors.

Tomic will no doubt become stronger as he matures into his still lanky frame but this may come at the cost of ability to cover the court. His placement of the serve is greatly improved and he is showing a greater maturity in shot selection - still tends to go for the showy drop shot winner instead of a bread and butter putaway, but definitely Tomic 2013 is a better model than Tomic 2012.

If only he had the heart of Hewitt and the good guy niceness of Rafter, Australia would really have a player they could love!!

his serve placement is not bad but his power sucks. his (flat!) first serve is usually sitting at 190 rarely getting to 200 kph. the problem is his sloppy mechanics. he doesn't load his hips well and opens up too early before his legs can drive.

he just folds his arm and then extends his body and arm in one motion instead of driving the legs first and delaying the arm strike/staying closed as long as possible. that is like a baseball pitcher flying open.

he could easily serve 20 kph faster if he didn't use a motion like a WTA girl. didn't his daddy have him throw some rocks? (always teach your kid to throw if you want him to be a good server). the serve doesn't look natural to him.

his power off the ground is not bad and he seems to have improved in that regard. but his serve has to be completely overhauled mechanically. it is probably technically the worst in the top100 (just technique, it is still about average because he is like 6"5 or so).

if he would learn to serve really well and keeps himself in perfect shape he could win slams.

 

[Sid_Vicious]

I think Raonic and Harrison have the least potential and have games which have been proven time and again to not be world class material. Raonic - massive serve, big forehand, terrible movement ala Isner + 0.5
Harrison is a bit like Roddick but his forehand serve are nowhere near Arod's. Dimmy has good strokes but poor balance and average movement. Tomic has prbly the best overall game stroke by stroke now that he's improved his serve and he moves decent for a guy his size. For him it's all mental and off court stuff ala speeding tickets

You are exaggerating about Raonic's movement. He moves alright for a guy his size. He will never sprint around the court as fast as Murray, but then again, neither will Tomic, who is pretty damn average himself when it comes to movement.

Additionally, players with huge serves and big forehands have done very well for themselves in the past. Especially when the surfaces were faster. Anyways, Raonic is already "world class material"; he is ranked number 15th in the world.

 

[Amelie Mauresmo]

This is obviously an American message board if anyone is overrated it is the American Ryan Harrison. I don't see Milos screaming like a big cry baby smashing rackets and swearing at the lines people and chair umpire like Ryan Harrison does. Milos is very poised and extremely mature for his age and unlike the young Americans this kid Canadian kid is PRODUCING the results!

Milos doesn't talk about getting results he lets his racket do the talking he already knocked off Andy Murray twice last year and leads him 2-1 in their head to head. Hardly, overrated when a young player has a winning record against a top 4 player and one of the elite in men's tennis.

Seems like sour grapes from the Americans on this board because their players aren't as highly ranked as Canadian Milos Raonic.

I also notice this nasty attitude from other American media outlets so quick to attack Raonic because Americans are no longer on top in men's tennis. A Canadian is seeded in the top 16 at the Australian Open yet NO AMERICANS are seeded in the top 16 at the Australian Open! Canadian tennis is doing very well!

Tennis Canada, has finally put in the money to centralize training, and help young Canadian tennis talent get the help they need to make it to the next level.

Milos Raonic success has also raised Canadian people's interest in tennis tremendously. Canadians are very proud of Milos.

Now TSN the Canadian sports network shows a lot of Milos Raonic matches he's done a lot for Canadian tennis.

Milos has a solid attitude, he's working hard, and he's had tremendous results. Raonic is improving every year. Two years ago Raonic was ranked 159 in the world now he's top 15 that's called progress folks!

Milos Raonic just turned 22 he's already in the ATP top 20 he's currently ranked number 15 but has been as high as number 13.

Raonic has already defeated Andy Murray TWICE last year leads him 2-1 yet Dimitrov couldn't get it done in Brisbane despite having a huge lead in the first set last week.

Raonic also has 3 ATP Tour titles.

Harrison is ranked in the 60s, never won an ATP title, and yet he acts like he's a tennis star and has a stuck up diva attitude.

 

[Sid_Vicious]

This is obviously an American message board if anyone is overrated it is the American Ryan Harrison. I don't see Milos screaming like a big cry baby smashing rackets and swearing at the lines people and chair umpire like Ryan Harrison does. Milos is very poised and extremely mature for his age and unlike the young Americans this kid Canadian kid is PRODUCING the results!

Milos doesn't talk about getting results he lets his racket do the talking he already knocked off Andy Murray twice last year and leads him 2-1 in their head to head. Hardly, overrated when a young player has a winning record against a top 4 player and one of the elite in men's tennis.

Seems like sour grapes from the Americans on this board because their players aren't as highly ranked as Canadian Milos Raonic.

I also notice this nasty attitude from other American media outlets so quick to attack Raonic because Americans are no longer on top in tennis. A Canadian is seeded in the top 16 and NO AMERICANS are seeded in the top 16 at the Australian Open! Canadian tennis is doing very well!

Tennis Canada, has finally put in the money to centralize training, and help young Canadian tennis talent get the help they need to make it to the next level.

Milos Raonic success has also raised Canadian people's interest in Canada tremendously. Canadians are very proud of Milos.

when he has a solid attitude, he's working hard, and he's had tremendous results. Raonic is improving every year. Two years ago Raonic was ranked 159 in the world now he's top 15 that's called progress folks!

Milos Raonic just turned 22 he's already in the ATP top 20 he's currently ranked number 15 but has been as high as number 13.

Raonic has already defeated Andy Murray TWICE last year leads him 2-1 yet Dimitrov couldn't get it done in Brisbane despite having a huge lead in the first set last week.

Raonic also has 3 ATP Tour titles.

Harrison is ranked in the 60s, never won an ATP title, and yet he acts like he's a tennis star and has a stuck up diva attitude.

More idiotic generalizations from you. You just can't help not talking out of your behind, can you? Yeah, Look at all these jealous "Americans" bashing Raonic and making a case for Harrison.

Raonic is the best now. Dimitrov if improves on inconsistencies has a high ceiling in terms of potential. I am bit biased towards him, but I think he'll have the best career out of them when it's all said and done

Harrison is not really in the same league as the other three imo. I think Tomic is wasting his talent a little atm. Raonic is already very good, but little room for improvement. I think Raonic, Dimitrov and Tomic are all future top 5. Tomic only if he gets his head straight.

Raonic has lost to Dimitrov in Brisbane and just today lost to Hewitt at Kooyong. Being Canadian, the Dimitrov loss doesn't concern me, but he should be beating Hewitt consistently now I think, regardless of where it is or whether it's an exo or not.

As it stands, I think Dimitrov has the most potential, but that means little until he uses it, and I don't except him to have a Fed like career or anything. If he can get 1% of that he'll do alright.

I dont see many areas Raonic can improve on as he pretty much plays a high level of his brand of tennis. He is not going to become a nimble baseline rabbit. Maybe he improves his tactics and shot selection. Anyway, he has the tools to be a top 10 player.

Dimitrov has the most potential I think. His footwork has improved alot. He just needs to work on fitness. He can be a top 5 player.

Tomic has an interesting game but its essentially a grinding game. He doesnt seem to have the patience to do it ever day.

Nishikori may break into the top 5 before any of the others but his body is already breaking down.

Goffin looks pretty interesting. Quick, great footwork, composed and a big forehand.

I dont think Harrison can be mentioned with the others yet as he hasnt really done anything.

I've been with Dimitrov for awhile now. He has the most potential of any of them. Harrison is good, but he is kinda maxed out at a top 20 player. Raonic is having very good results, he will have a good consistent career. Tomic.... What a shame. I actually liked his game, but he needs to mature big time.

2013 is crucial for them. IMO Raonic has the most potential...

Raonic is ridiculously overrated. Harrison, why bother ? Dimitrov and Tomic are by far and away the most talented of this group. Tomic is a lot more confident and cocky than Dimitrov, helps to have that at such an age. Despite Dimitrov having a "prettier" game than Tomic, the Aussie has a more mature game and is a better thinker on the court. If Tomic can get it together he will go a long way, further than the others in this group.

I think dimitrov will have a good career.

tomic is certainly the most naturally talented of those 4 guys. he is extremely intelligent on the court and knows where to hit the ball.

however his strokes and movement are often sloppy. his serve is terrible technically and he needs to get stronger.

Agree Raonic is overrated, not sure I see it with him.

Dimi definitely the most potential, but can also seem him going nowhere this year - 2013 is big for him. Needs to get off to a good start in the AO

Now tell me. Where is this American bias? Almost everyone believes that Dimitrov is the most talented player in the group. Not one person mentioned Harrison as being the most talented. Apparently, Americans (who make up 99.99% of this forum in your ignorant mind) hate Raonic so much that they have made a Bulgarian guy their idol....LOL

You just needed a stupid made-up reason to go on yet another nonsensical rant about something.

 

[Deleted member 307496]

I'd say this is how their careers will go.

Raonic - Has a Roddick like career, achieves #1 at some point, doesn't hold it long (about 10 weeks, ending a year at #1) and from then on out is just a member of the top ten.

Tomic - I'd say Tomic's career best will be either #3 or #4, probably during a really weak era. He won't spend much time in the top ten compared to Raonic.

Harrison - Will achieve (maybe) a top ten ranking at some point, (#9 or #8) and that's about it.

Dimitrov - Will be a future #1, will probably hold the #1 ranking for a while (think Hewitt 2001-2002, ect) before somebody steals it off him. Will usually be ranked from #5-#2 from then on.

 

[dominikk1985]

Raonic has his limits but also some great strengths.

like isner he is a big serve, big FH guy but I believe his movement while being below average is a lot better then isners movement.

he also might become one of the best servers ever. his career hold percentage is currently already the best in tennis history higher than sampras, fed and goran and even a bit higher than isner and ivo. and this is in very unfavorable conditions.

of course this might drop a little as he declines (however not necesarily since a lot of great servers continue to serve well till they are 30-just look at ivo or dent who did some of their hardest serves at that age- as long as their shoulders stay healthy of course) but it is pretty obvious that he is an all time serving talent.

that makes him always dangerous but to become .a top 5 player he needs to improve his ROS und BH as well as his movement.

 

[Ronny]

interested to see what people think of tomic after his win in sydney today. certainly a promising start to the year and just a shame that he'll probably lose points at the aus open as he's playing federer in the 3rd round

 

[beast of mallorca]

I'd rather pick Nishikori, Janowicz or Goffin. Dmitrov is ok tho'

 

[Candide]

I'd say this is how their careers will go.

Raonic - Has a Roddick like career, achieves #1 at some point, doesn't hold it long (about 10 weeks, ending a year at #1) and from then on out is just a member of the top ten.

Tomic - I'd say Tomic's career best will be either #3 or #4, probably during a really weak era. He won't spend much time in the top ten compared to Raonic.

Harrison - Will achieve (maybe) a top ten ranking at some point, (#9 or #8) and that's about it.

Dimitrov - Will be a future #1, will probably hold the #1 ranking for a while (think Hewitt 2001-2002, ect) before somebody steals it off him. Will usually be ranked from #5-#2 from then on.

Wow, already with the weak era knock. It's hard to win with this one. How strong was the era in Laver's time I wonder. I know his main rival was the Herculean Ken Rosewall at a mighty 5' 7'' who weighed about as much as Francesca Schiavone - talk about your weak era. It hasn't hurt perception of him much though.

 

[Timbo's hopeless slice]

well, one less young gun to follow this week.. (that was quick, eh?)

 

[Talker]

Dimitrov out already.
He'll probably stick around and watch Maria play.



Raonic is the only one showing any potential, the others are OK but not much to see.

 

[augustobt]

Dimitrov had the worst draw, come one. Benneteau isn't a dead fish.

 

[cc0509]

Dimitrov had the worst draw, come one. Benneteau isn't a dead fish.

Stop making excuses for this kid. He has been overhyped for years and does not have even one Mickey Mouse ATP title. He should have at least a few ATP titles by now. He is not living up to his potential even though his game is lovely to watch. He should be beating guys like Benneteau by now.

 

[Talker]

Benneteau can be pretty good.

Dimitrov isn't bad or anything like that, he may get a little better, maybe a top 25er or so someday.

 

[augustobt]

Stop making excuses for this kid. He has been overhyped for years and does not have even one Mickey Mouse ATP title. He should have at least a few ATP titles by now. He is not living up to his potential even though his game is lovely to watch. He should be beating guys like Benneteau by now.

Don't be silly.

If Dimitrov had a draw like: Giraldo -> Falla -> Youzhny, he can easily reach R4.

 

[jwjh]

Dimitrov had the worst draw, come one. Benneteau isn't a dead fish.

Stop making excuses for this kid. He has been overhyped for years and does not have even one Mickey Mouse ATP title. He should have at least a few ATP titles by now. He is not living up to his potential even though his game is lovely to watch. He should be beating guys like Benneteau by now.

Benneteau can be pretty good.

Dimitrov isn't bad or anything like that, he may get a little better, maybe a top 25er or so someday.

Dimilfrov beat Benneteau twice just last year albeit both went to 3 sets.