Not convinced that Paul is a fantastic coach/communicator, but we'll see what he can do. I think everyone wants to see Grigor do even better next year.
No one even congratulated the OP. Did he just scoop all major sports sources? That would be pretty incredible if he did. I don't see it reported anywhere else.
Hey guys, I temporarily uploaded a crappy quality version and am in the process of reuploading it in HD on my iPad Mini. Thanks for your patience.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcczFIg40z4
Bad move. Annacone wasted Federer's prime years and now he'll destroy career of baby Fed.
Better thing is at least he went for proper coach rather than just a physical trainer.
Ideal coach for Dimitrov is skills based aggressive former retired player like Haas (he has already shown interest), McEnroe, Sampras, Becker, Edberg and many other S&V players from 90's or previous era could help him evolving his all court talent.
I think Magnus Norman could do him a world of good to sort out his mental issues, the way he did with Söderling and Wawrinka. Of course, there is the slight issue of him not being available right now, but definitely a move to consider in the future, imho.
For me early he get rid of Annacone would be better for his career.
Norman is still better Option than Annacone. IMV Norman can help him building his weak ground game especially forehand like he did with Sod, Wawr.
I think you're probably considering a different Annacone. Not the one that coached Pete Sampras and Federer.
On paper it looks good but I wasn't particularly impressed with Federer's performance under tutelage of Paul.
Became world number 1 and won Wimbledon. Unclear whether or not he carried a bad back already. Hard to impress you.
Paul Annacone. Confirmed today by Maximagq Inquirer. Reporting live from the University of California at Los Angeles.
So you mean Annacone is great coach?
Federer was capable of winning more than one slam physically during 2010-12 period. With Annacone Federer was like lottery. He used to play brilliantly but once in 6 months. With Edberg even with advanced age Federer has more consistent results, more wins over top 10. Federer never put focused efforts working on every aspect of his game like he did with Edberg.
Current Federer physically declined but his serve, backhand, volleys are much better and consistent than 2010-12 period
Three things become clear from your posts in this thread. You know next to nothing about Annacone's career as a coach and you believe a healthy Federer being better than an injured Federer is due to Edberg being a better coach than Annacone. Last but not least, you forgot this thread is about Dimitrov.
Dimitrov is the next Federer. Today age 26 is the new 18. So, Dimitrov's peak will be age 29-32 and he will start dominating then and winning.
Three things become clear from your posts in this thread. You know next to nothing about Annacone's career as a coach and you believe a healthy Federer being better than an injured Federer is due to Edberg being a better coach than Annacone. Last but not least, you forgot this thread is about Dimitrov.
I think Sampras' 2000 Wimbledon form was decent enough. His serve and groundgame took a backseat compared to '99 but he was still rather vicious; especially when he attacked a whole lot more.You know having read all of the posts here I see where some of you guys are coming from. Initially I said it's good and that is still the case. But I also share some of the views of his previous stints.
For instance, I was never satisfied with how Sampras' game went from the late 1990s onwards. I much preferred the Sampras under Tim Gullickson and before that Joe Brandi. Sampras said in his book he resisted Annacone in wanting him to play attacking tennis non stop but in the end he did. He played too quick, didn't demonstrate enough patience too often especially 2000 onwards. One of the plays I disliked the most was jettisoning the tried and trusted running round the backhand to fit big forehands on return of serve in the ad court, which he was extremely good at, for the chip and charge instead, which he was no so good at. I also didn't like the serve volley on both serves on hardcourts because it was totally uneccessary and gave opponents too many targets. The Sampras up to around 1999 was still very much the Gullickson one, and he had more overall success that way. Success really dried up during the attack attack attack 2000 - 2002 period, and his confidence suffered.
Now in Federer's case, I do remember 2012 Wimbledon final was his best tennis for a number of years. One might argue Murray allowed Federer to play that way once he got rid of the nerves. Again, Federer was chip charging the Murray 2nd serve (which does make sense as Murray's 2nd delivery is seriously lacking), and Annacone did help Federer get back to number 1 so must be given credit. But Federer is not quite as attack minded as Sampras and so there might have been confusion in his mind on how best to deal with Annacone's tactical plans.
So really, Annacone's job has to be to strike the right balance, in what he learned from coaching Sampras and Federer. Which is to strike the balance between attacking and defending. Sampras had that good balance for many years and then jettisoned it, Federer enjoys defending probably a little bit more too. Defending is fun as long you can switch defence to attack from time to time.
I think Dimitrov has the capability but one thing he doesn't have for sure, is the Federer and Sampras ability to hit winners at will. Sampras could hit clean winners well behind the baseline off both wings and Federer is one of the very best around the basleine itself not giving ground. So Dimitrov really has to play more up the court like Agassi but be prepared to hit into the corners and attack the net which I think he is good at. And add some more explosiveness to his shots so he can start hitting winners which would make his opponents' more worried when they play him.
This is probably Paul Annacone's last chance with a top player, if he doesn't get Dimitrov to top 5 and into a slam final, his stock will definitely go down and his methods may be deemed outdated. We'll see.
It doesn't surprise me that everybody here believed Matt without him providing any sources.
My video quality wasn't good, but when Dimitrov is on the side closest to the camera, the coach walking around is Paul Annacone.
But how does that translate to Annacone is now Dimitrov's official coach?
But how does that translate to Annacone is now Dimitrov's official coach?
Well if he is going over tactics with Grigor on what serving strategies he should execute, that must mean something.
Well if he is going over tactics with Grigor on what serving strategies he should execute, that must mean something.
Like this one?
Hey guys, I temporarily uploaded a crappy quality version and am in the process of reuploading it in HD on my iPad Mini. Thanks for your patience.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YcczFIg40z4
If Paul does Coach Grigor, it will be great for Soviet tennis.
#PTL #JC4Ever
AngieB