The reason critics are being so "nip-picky" is because Fedalovic are so close when it comes to the historic record of their play! Even though Roger's several years older, he's about to be surpassed in just about every way possible by Nadovic! To distinguish each of the "Big 3," we zero in on anomalies like "most of Nadal's majors inordinately come on clay!" Unlike Laver who had 3 tournaments on grass, there was little he could do about that! Fedovic have a more balanced record with that added sweetener of multiple YEC's; something Nadal's been struggling to accomplish just once!