I mean even ATP doesn't separate h2h, I don't know.Why is slam h2h excluded?
15-13 in finals for Djokovic. In 18 GS meetings Nadal has the lead 11-7.Why is slam h2h excluded?
How many more slams does Nadal need to rank ahead for you?His career is too much for Nadal. I don’t understand the discussion between them. Djokovic is that much more successful. That is just incredible numbers and achievements across the board, he knocks him out the park.
I think ATP named it like that after Djokovic won all masters the first time.Why is it called career golden masters?
Even 30 more will not convince him. He probably still thinks Sampras is a greater player than Nadal. Haters, what to expect from them.How many more slams does Nadal need to rank ahead for you?
How many more slams does Nadal need to rank ahead for you?
I hope you're not jinxing NadalSuch a small table with hard to read numbers.
But, I could read the most important numbers: 22 > 21.
I think he's also lucky to be able to vulture across a weak generation of players. Nobody since Andy Murray's rise in 2008 has come about since then with any real consistency. Del Potro was the other who came about that same year but injuries did him in.The pandemic really put a damper on things for Djokovic. He essentially missed an opportunity at 3 Slams because of it and if there was never a pandemic, that wouldn't have happened. It could look even more different for him right now if that wasn't the case.
I would say 3 Slams being missed while you're in form is anything but luck. Yea the field is weaker but you still have to go out there and win the matches. Djokovic goes out there and beats the players to win and is not dependent on the draw or someone being out of the draw to win. To me that is luck.I think he's also lucky to be able to vulture across a weak generation of players. Nobody since Andy Murray's rise in 2008 has come about since then with any real consistency. Del Potro was the other who came about that same year but injuries did him in.
I think Casper Ruud making two major finals and the ATP finals is very telling of the quality of men's tennis today. While there is good quality talent at the top with Medvedev, Zverev, and Alcaraz, a lot more was/is expected of them by this stage. Zverev especially has not achieved anywhere close to his ability and we've seen what he can do to Djokovic when he's in the zone (Olympics and ATP Finals twice)
It's not excluded, you just missed it. It's included into h2h row as a part of 30-29.Why is slam h2h excluded?
So it wouldn't matter if Nadal was say 3-4 slams ahead?It's not the slams where Nadal needs to distance himself. It's the overallness of this situation.
With 23-20, I would put him ahead of Federer. Right now with 22-20, it's pretty unclear, but I still consider Fed's career greater.How many more slams does Nadal need to rank ahead for you?
So for Nadal to lock being better he needs 5 more slams?With 23-20, I would put him ahead of Federer. Right now with 22-20, it's pretty unclear, but I still consider Fed's career greater.
24-21 would put him in the same ballpark with Novak, and with 25-21 Rafa would have strong argument for GOAThood.
Its all because Rafa never reached Fed/Djok no1 record levels + their peak tour domination levels + his career is not near as complete as Novak's is.
I think he's also lucky to be able to vulture across a weak generation of players.
Its clay skewed so not applicableWhy is slam h2h excluded?
With 23-20, I would put him ahead of Federer. Right now with 22-20, it's pretty unclear, but I still consider Fed's career greater.
24-21 would put him in the same ballpark with Novak, and with 25-21 Rafa would have strong argument for GOAThood.
Its all because Rafa never reached Fed/Djok no1 record levels + their peak tour domination levels + his career is not near as complete as Novak's is.
I think ATP named it like that after Djokovic won all masters the first time.
The pandemic really put a damper on things for Djokovic. He essentially missed an opportunity at 3 Slams because of it and if there was never a pandemic, that wouldn't have happened. It could look even more different for him right now if that wasn't the case.
4, with 2 or 3 non-RG GS titles.So for Nadal to lock being better he needs 5 more slams?
No, it wouldn't. And you know it very well.4, with 2 or 3 non-RG GS titles.
The thing is Rafa lacks so much in big titles, no1 weeks/years, peak domination and completeness categories vs Novak, that it's really hard to neutralize this huge difference with few RG titles.
If he could get 300+ weeks and 6 years no1 with zero GS titles, that would be worth more than 4 new RG titles.
1 YEC title would be worth more than 1 RG title for Rafa in GOAT race.
When Federer won his last 3 slams to push his total to 20, everyone sane back then said he is a clear goat and here we are 4 years later and he is barely in conversation.No, it wouldn't. And you know it very well.
As for non-clay titles, well, he won AO this year, right? Yet all we hear from haters is bashing.
When Federer won his last 3 slams to push his total to 20, everyone sane back then said he is a clear goat and here we are 4 years later and he is barely in conversation.
I'm not hating or bashing, his 2xCGS is one of the greatest accomplishments tennis player can make. Although his career is one of the most complete in tennis history, he is still significantly behind Novak in that regard.No, it wouldn't. And you know it very well.
As for non-clay titles, well, he won AO this year, right? Yet all we hear from haters is bashing.
No, it wouldn't. And you know it very well.
As for non-clay titles, well, he won AO this year, right? Yet all we hear from haters is bashing.
Right? Wrong.
He didn't win anything, he mega-vultured the goddamn thing.
Ughhh. Makes me sick to my stomach seeing his ugly paws desecrating that cup even for a second. Decades of sweat and tears from well deserved winners equalized with that? Disgusting.
National Representation? So they both won Davis cup 1 time each?
didn’t Nadal also win 2 Olympic gold medals for his country?
I always thought career platinum Masters would have been a better name for it tbh.Kinda stupid, given that golden slam is because of the presence of Olympic gold, whereas there is no such thing for Master's.
Well can't predict injuries, and they are always possible, but only saying 3 missed opportunities is definitely significant.Sure but he could have broken a leg at one of those missed slams and be out for the 2 years after.
Right? Wrong.
He didn't win anything, he mega-vultured the goddamn thing.
Ughhh. Makes me sick to my stomach seeing his ugly paws desecrating that cup even for a second. Decades of sweat and tears from well deserved winners equalized with that? Disgusting.
Lol, hope for your mental health that this is sarcasm. How the **** can you get so much hate for a guy you never met.Right? Wrong.
He didn't win anything, he mega-vultured the goddamn thing.
Ughhh. Makes me sick to my stomach seeing his ugly paws desecrating that cup even for a second. Decades of sweat and tears from well deserved winners equalized with that? Disgusting.
With 23-20, I would put him ahead of Federer. Right now with 22-20, it's pretty unclear, but I still consider Fed's career greater.
24-21 would put him in the same ballpark with Novak, and with 25-21 Rafa would have strong argument for GOAThood.
Its all because Rafa never reached Fed/Djok no1 record levels + their peak tour domination levels + his career is not near as complete as Novak's is.
Right? Wrong.
He didn't win anything, he mega-vultured the goddamn thing.
Ughhh. Makes me sick to my stomach seeing his ugly paws desecrating that cup even for a second. Decades of sweat and tears from well deserved winners equalized with that? Disgusting.