Is approaching up the middle a good strategy?
"Don Budge advised me to approach up the middle. Take away the passing shot angle."
Edberg would also use it sometimes.
It can be an effective play, especially against players who like to use sharp angled passing shots.
Give it a try. I will sometimes chip & charge with an "up the middle" approach shot, it can catch the server off-guard and since he doesn't have great angles, it can be hard for him to pass you (if you keep your approach shot deep).
Not sure why practically all coaches say, "approach down the line"...
Mac does it here on return.
Is approaching up the middle a good strategy?
"Don Budge advised me to approach up the middle. Take away the passing shot angle."
I watched the us open and its amazing how few players understand this simple concept. An inside out approach is bad...
Krajeck did it best, he even approached up the middle with no pace.
Inside out attack is bad unless it is a winner or so forcing that opponent can only chip it back. If the opponent can hit a controlled passing shot against your I O approach you are toast but those pros try to hit a winner there and only follow it in case the opponent gets his frame on it. So if you attack I O you need to kill it or at least make the opponent scramble.
You Can do this but the approach shot needs to be very deep and with some pace because that gives the other player a bad angle to pass. A short approach to the middle however means a very easy passing shot because if you hit it inside the baseline you can still generate a good angle.
Goal with an approach shot should always be that the passing player has to hit it at least like 7 feet behind the baseline, so you need to push him back before you approach.
time stamp is your friend
The OP video is 43 long. Could someone post the time of the OP quote.
"Don Budge advised me to approach up the middle. Take away the passing shot angle."
I watched this video earlier this week. That discussion starts around the 37 minute mark
Also not as many angles available to Don Budge and his peers using wooden racquets and continental/eastern grips.
Both true in these days of polyester strings making passing shots dive quicker and allowing greater angles for the pass. However, if someone is going to the net, they still need to approach up the line or down the middle to allow the least amount of angle for the pass. I do get frustrated watching even the pros approach cross-court and ending up getting passed with the ball 10 feet or more away from their racket even if they are at full stretch. They're standing in the ad court service box while the pass is going down the deuce court line.Inside out attack is bad unless it is a winner or so forcing that opponent can only chip it back. If the opponent can hit a controlled passing shot against your I O approach you are toast but those pros try to hit a winner there and only follow it in case the opponent gets his frame on it. So if you attack I O you need to kill it or at least make the opponent scramble.
With pros, it’s complicated, many are so good with passing shots: have seen multiple times how textbook deep slice DTL approach shots get eaten up easily. I think with CC they are more after put away shots. However, if the other guy anticipates/guesses (what they do a lot when opponent is in good position to put the ball away), he gets to the ball in time and has good look on the pass.I do get frustrated watching even the pros approach cross-court and ending up getting passed with the ball 10 feet or more away from their racket even if they are at full stretch. They're standing in the ad court service box while the pass is going down the deuce court line.
Both true in these days of polyester strings making passing shots dive quicker and allowing greater angles for the pass. However, if someone is going to the net, they still need to approach up the line or down the middle to allow the least amount of angle for the pass. I do get frustrated watching even the pros approach cross-court and ending up getting passed with the ball 10 feet or more away from their racket even if they are at full stretch. They're standing in the ad court service box while the pass is going down the deuce court line.
Basically, you want to be at the net standing in front of the opponent to cut off the most angle. (of course, adjust for not having to cover out balls)
These guys were never taught properly how to go to the net for the first 18 or 19 years of their lives. Then they figure out they need a more complete game. It takes an awful lot of concentrated effort to change habits and add something new to your tennis game, especially when it could result in short-term losses which costs money and points.The 'pros' are idiots who don't know how to play!
What I said above is a law of physics and of geometry and always true:
approach up the line or down the middle to allow the least amount of angle for the pass.
The case that you, in particular, pass better crosscourt does not mean that all players should run away from the side of the court from where the opponent is hitting the ball. I thought it would go without saying that players should understand their opponents strengths and weaknesses, but I guess I have to say it. Understand your opponents strengths and weaknesses, there may be exceptions.Usually my opponents follow that exact strategy. Approach down the line to my backhand side and shade towards protecting my down the line pass.
However, I find it much more difficult to pass down the line. More comfortable with backhand sharp angle and I often end up passing them cross-court sharp angle.
Granted, it is not an easy shot but I still find it easier than down the line backhand pass.
So I am not sure why the conventional advice is to "cover down the line pass". I'd say it depends on the opponent. In some cases, it is better to give them the down the line and cover more of the cross-court pass.
The case that you, in particular, pass better crosscourt does not mean that all players should run away from the side of the court from where the opponent is hitting the ball. I thought it would go without saying that players should understand their opponents strengths and weaknesses, but I guess I have to say it. Understand your opponents strengths and weaknesses, there may be exceptions.
It’s important to understand where is the actual balanced position to cover both directions.An equally viable strategy is to shade over slightly to protect more of the cross-court pass and concede a little area DTL, and verify that the opponent can make that DTL pass before committing to absolutely covering most of that DTL passing lane .
This looks very reasonable, not for just approach shot but for 1st volley as well.Some more thoughts on approaching down the middle: