Roger Federer beat Andre Agassi 6-4, 6-3 in the Miami semi-final, 2005 on hard court
Federer would go onto win the event, beating Rafael Nadal in the final. The two had previously contested the final in 2002 with Agassi having won
Federer won 70 points, Agassi 56
Serve Stats
Federer...
- 1st serve percentage (42/66) 64%
- 1st serve points won (31/42) 74%
- 2nd serve points won (16/24) 67%
- Aces 8, Service Winners 2 (1 second serve)
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (24/66) 36%
Agassi...
- 1st serve percentage (30/60) 50%
- 1st serve points won (22/30) 73%
- 2nd serve points won (15/30) 50%
- Service Winners 1 (a second serve)
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (15/60) 25%
Serve Pattern
Federer served...
- to FH 39%
- to BH 56%
- to Body 5%
Agassi served...
- to FH 24%
- to BH 73%
- to Body 3%
Return Stats
Federer made...
- 44 (11 FH, 33 BH), including 1 runaround FH & 3 return-approaches
- 2 Winners (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 14 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (1 FH, 4 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 9 Forced (3 FH, 6 BH)
- Return Rate (44/59) 75%
Agassi made...
- 40 (21 FH, 19 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 2 Winners (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 14 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (2 FH, 3 BH)
- 9 Forced (3 FH, 6 BH)
- Return Rate (40/64) 63%
Break Points
Federer 2/8 (3 games)
Agassi 0/5 (1 game)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Federer 21 (10 FH, 5 BH, 2 FHV, 4 BHV)
Agassi 13 (4 FH, 5 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV, 2 OH)
Federer's FHs - 5 cc, 1 dtl pass at net, 1 inside-out and 3 inside-in (1 return)
- BHs - 2 cc (1 return) and 3 dtl
- 1 from a return-approach point, a BHV
- 1 other BHV was net-to-net
Agassi's FHs - 2 cc (1 return), 1 inside-out and 1 inside-in
- BHs - 3 cc (2 passes - 1 a return), 1 dtl pass (a one handed slice) and 1 dtl/inside-out pass
- 1 OH was on the bounce from the baseline
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Federer 26
- 17 Unforced (9 FH, 6 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net & 1 non-net FHV
- 9 Forced (6 FH, 1 BH, 1 BH1/2V, 1 Back-to-Net)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.3
Agassi 24
- 13 Unforced (4 FH, 9 BH)
- 11 Forced (5 FH, 6 BH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 43.8
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Federer was...
- 12/20 (60%) at net, including...
- 0/1 serve-volleying, a 1st serve
---
- 2/3 (67%) return-approaching
- 0/1 forced back
Agassi was...
- 5/8 (63%) at net, with...
- 1/1 retreated
Match Report
Good match from both players and comfortable win for Federer who's a bit better in virtually all areas on a slow-ish court
Fed finishes +4 winners over UEs, having forced 11 errors out of Agassi too. Agassi is even on winners/UEs difference while forcing 9 errors. Excellent numbers on such a court. About a year ago, the two had played in similar conditions at Indian Wells and combined for about double the UEs to winners
General pattern on play in the match up is Agassi hitting BH cc's whenever he can to breakdown Fed's weaker side. Usually, he gets better of these exchanges, to varying degrees. Standout feature of this match is Fed, if anything, slightly better on BH-BH rallies, while retaining his usual advantages (the serve, movement and damaging ability of the FH), leaving Agassi at a loss to how to proceed. Agassi remains solid but doesn't have any answers with his go-to play stumped
Serve & Return
There seems to be tailored-for-the-opponent game in the way both players serve
Agassi serves aggressively wide, far beyond his norm. Generally, he's apt to serve regularly in swing zone. The downside is low first serve in count of 50%. The upside is forcing return errors or defensive returns he can take charge off. Fed returns well. For starters he gives up just one ace (a second serve), due to ability to reach wide balls. Gets a good number of the wide ones back too. And some good, firm deep returns to serves (1st and 2nds) that he can reach readily
Same deal returning second serves, with more of them being easy to reach, with occasional attacking returns thrown in. There are 3 return-approaches and 2 winners - neither being things Fed's generally apt to do. Agassi serves bulk 73% to BH and Fed swings at the returns rather than chips or blocks them back. In the final against a more-or-less unknown Rafael Nadal, he'd chip BHs back by contrast. I imagine both Agassi's serving and Fed's returning being more attacking than their norms is a nod of respect to the others game
Something similar with Fed serving and Agassi returning. Fed engages in regular (for him) first serving, which has bulk out wide. When in a hole, he goes for more and bangs down aces. Its the second serves that are exceptionally beyond his norm. With Agassi typically looking to step in and smack them early, Fed goes attackingly wide with second serves while taking pace off it. It largely works. Agassi gets his fair share of meaty deep returns off but its difficult and low percentage. 36% unreturned rate for Fed on this court is a good figure - a healthy 11% higher than what Agassi can muster
With first serve points won virtually the same (Fed 74%, Agassi 73%), the major difference comes out in second serve points won (Fed with excellent 67%, Agassi a respectable 50%). Fed's high second serve points won is largely due to the quality of his second serve that allows him to start rally from advantageous position. Against Agassi, it wouldn't be unusual for server to start from defensive position most of the time, let a lone neutral one. Agassi matching Fed on first serve points won is also a bit surprising and due to his serving particularly aggressively
Note coincidence of virtually identical return error numbers - both with 5 UEs (Fed with 4 BHs and a runaround FH, Agassi 2 FHs and 3 BHs), both with 9 FEs (both with 3 FHs and 6 BHs)
In nutshell, both wary enough of the other to look to do more than their usual with the first two shots. Fed naturally with stronger serve comfortably coming up ahead on the whole
Federer would go onto win the event, beating Rafael Nadal in the final. The two had previously contested the final in 2002 with Agassi having won
Federer won 70 points, Agassi 56
Serve Stats
Federer...
- 1st serve percentage (42/66) 64%
- 1st serve points won (31/42) 74%
- 2nd serve points won (16/24) 67%
- Aces 8, Service Winners 2 (1 second serve)
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (24/66) 36%
Agassi...
- 1st serve percentage (30/60) 50%
- 1st serve points won (22/30) 73%
- 2nd serve points won (15/30) 50%
- Service Winners 1 (a second serve)
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (15/60) 25%
Serve Pattern
Federer served...
- to FH 39%
- to BH 56%
- to Body 5%
Agassi served...
- to FH 24%
- to BH 73%
- to Body 3%
Return Stats
Federer made...
- 44 (11 FH, 33 BH), including 1 runaround FH & 3 return-approaches
- 2 Winners (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 14 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (1 FH, 4 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 9 Forced (3 FH, 6 BH)
- Return Rate (44/59) 75%
Agassi made...
- 40 (21 FH, 19 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 2 Winners (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 14 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (2 FH, 3 BH)
- 9 Forced (3 FH, 6 BH)
- Return Rate (40/64) 63%
Break Points
Federer 2/8 (3 games)
Agassi 0/5 (1 game)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Federer 21 (10 FH, 5 BH, 2 FHV, 4 BHV)
Agassi 13 (4 FH, 5 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV, 2 OH)
Federer's FHs - 5 cc, 1 dtl pass at net, 1 inside-out and 3 inside-in (1 return)
- BHs - 2 cc (1 return) and 3 dtl
- 1 from a return-approach point, a BHV
- 1 other BHV was net-to-net
Agassi's FHs - 2 cc (1 return), 1 inside-out and 1 inside-in
- BHs - 3 cc (2 passes - 1 a return), 1 dtl pass (a one handed slice) and 1 dtl/inside-out pass
- 1 OH was on the bounce from the baseline
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Federer 26
- 17 Unforced (9 FH, 6 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net & 1 non-net FHV
- 9 Forced (6 FH, 1 BH, 1 BH1/2V, 1 Back-to-Net)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.3
Agassi 24
- 13 Unforced (4 FH, 9 BH)
- 11 Forced (5 FH, 6 BH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 43.8
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Federer was...
- 12/20 (60%) at net, including...
- 0/1 serve-volleying, a 1st serve
---
- 2/3 (67%) return-approaching
- 0/1 forced back
Agassi was...
- 5/8 (63%) at net, with...
- 1/1 retreated
Match Report
Good match from both players and comfortable win for Federer who's a bit better in virtually all areas on a slow-ish court
Fed finishes +4 winners over UEs, having forced 11 errors out of Agassi too. Agassi is even on winners/UEs difference while forcing 9 errors. Excellent numbers on such a court. About a year ago, the two had played in similar conditions at Indian Wells and combined for about double the UEs to winners
General pattern on play in the match up is Agassi hitting BH cc's whenever he can to breakdown Fed's weaker side. Usually, he gets better of these exchanges, to varying degrees. Standout feature of this match is Fed, if anything, slightly better on BH-BH rallies, while retaining his usual advantages (the serve, movement and damaging ability of the FH), leaving Agassi at a loss to how to proceed. Agassi remains solid but doesn't have any answers with his go-to play stumped
Serve & Return
There seems to be tailored-for-the-opponent game in the way both players serve
Agassi serves aggressively wide, far beyond his norm. Generally, he's apt to serve regularly in swing zone. The downside is low first serve in count of 50%. The upside is forcing return errors or defensive returns he can take charge off. Fed returns well. For starters he gives up just one ace (a second serve), due to ability to reach wide balls. Gets a good number of the wide ones back too. And some good, firm deep returns to serves (1st and 2nds) that he can reach readily
Same deal returning second serves, with more of them being easy to reach, with occasional attacking returns thrown in. There are 3 return-approaches and 2 winners - neither being things Fed's generally apt to do. Agassi serves bulk 73% to BH and Fed swings at the returns rather than chips or blocks them back. In the final against a more-or-less unknown Rafael Nadal, he'd chip BHs back by contrast. I imagine both Agassi's serving and Fed's returning being more attacking than their norms is a nod of respect to the others game
Something similar with Fed serving and Agassi returning. Fed engages in regular (for him) first serving, which has bulk out wide. When in a hole, he goes for more and bangs down aces. Its the second serves that are exceptionally beyond his norm. With Agassi typically looking to step in and smack them early, Fed goes attackingly wide with second serves while taking pace off it. It largely works. Agassi gets his fair share of meaty deep returns off but its difficult and low percentage. 36% unreturned rate for Fed on this court is a good figure - a healthy 11% higher than what Agassi can muster
With first serve points won virtually the same (Fed 74%, Agassi 73%), the major difference comes out in second serve points won (Fed with excellent 67%, Agassi a respectable 50%). Fed's high second serve points won is largely due to the quality of his second serve that allows him to start rally from advantageous position. Against Agassi, it wouldn't be unusual for server to start from defensive position most of the time, let a lone neutral one. Agassi matching Fed on first serve points won is also a bit surprising and due to his serving particularly aggressively
Note coincidence of virtually identical return error numbers - both with 5 UEs (Fed with 4 BHs and a runaround FH, Agassi 2 FHs and 3 BHs), both with 9 FEs (both with 3 FHs and 6 BHs)
In nutshell, both wary enough of the other to look to do more than their usual with the first two shots. Fed naturally with stronger serve comfortably coming up ahead on the whole