RF20Lennon
Legend
LOL I like how if Fed doesn't give enough credit, he gets hate. If he is does and is happy, he gets trolled.
Nope, you're just lying there.
I'm not surprise with this statement from the old man. Just like Berdych, they sacrifice their pride. and their competitiveness to show compassion to the one who doesn't give a crap if you like him or you don't. No wonder they always get spanked by Rafito.
Federer a lapdog??? Then what is Djokovic? Why did he get beat 22 times by Nadal?
While I agree in part, surely you can't be serious in putting Federer in the same category as this:
It's still unnecessary. He should of just said, "Rafa's played well all year and deserves the No.1 spot".
His statement reeks of fanboyism.
I agree.
I still wouldn't go that far. I'll give him the benefit of the doubt and hope he was just overcompensating and being diplomatically effusive in his praise.
Lol, you cannot be serious
That's almost two years old. And it was in response to some comments by Fed which weren't exactly friendly.
Lol, so true
They must be so disappointed, lol.
I'm not surprise with this statement from the old man. Just like Berdych, they sacrifice their pride. and their competitiveness to show compassion to the one who doesn't give a crap if you like him or you don't. No wonder they always get spanked by Rafito.
No. He doesn't do this to anyone. He would never do such things like this for Djokovic.
Opinion doesn't equate to lying.
It's still unnecessary. He should of just said, "Rafa's played well all year and deserves the No.1 spot".
His statement reeks of fanboyism.
Fred does not dislike Noel. You are trying to make your opinion sound like a fact.http://www.atpworldtour.com/News/Tennis/2013/10/41/Shanghai-Monday-Federer-Preview.aspx
We all know Federer likes Nadal but this was a really classy thing for him to say, because after all, Nadal's trying to catch Federer's slam count and if I were Federer I would not want Nadal to win. Or maybe it was because Federer dislike Djokovic so much that he wanted Nadal to win regardless of the fact that his slam count is caught up by him. I would never imagine him say things like this for Djokovic or Murray.
So here's a poll for your guys!
Federer is a fan of tennis. Plus, he and Nadal get along well. I think that he is being genuine and congratulating Nadal. He can appreciate that Nadal had to face adversity, yet Nadal was able to come back strong. He played better than ever on hard courts. Federer was happy because he knew how much it meant to Nadal. I think he understands that it's good for tennis as well.
like i said we need more guys like Gulbis or Janowicz, tennis fans don't give a crap about gentleman sissy stuff, we want blood on the court.
Nadal also says Federer is the greatest blah blah after beating him...what these guys say in public isn't always true...but Federer is usually far more honest and straightforward in his interviews.
He used to be... he stopped being too candid somewhere around 2007 after the unwarranted flack he kept getting from fans and the press for whom every statement he uttered was some sort cryptic riddle that needed to be decontextualized and read between the lines to reveal the true insidious message hidden within.
Nadal also says Federer is the greatest blah blah after beating him...what these guys say in public isn't always true...but Federer is usually far more honest and straightforward in his interviews.
That poster was lying though.
Yep. Deal with it
Yeah true...but between Nadal and Federer, it's not even close. Federer doesn't say I have to play against the toughest opponent in the world and play the best tennis I have ever played to beat him when he's facing someone ranked outside 100...
I bet when Fed said them fanboyish things about Rafa, he when to the back and grabbed a bucket asap.
Yeah true...but between Nadal and Federer, it's not even close. Federer doesn't say I have to play against the toughest opponent in the world and play the best tennis I have ever played to beat him when he's facing someone ranked outside 100...
and guess who this year lost to opponents outside top 100 ?
Nadal one time,
Federer 2 times
That proves one thing, Nadal is right to not underestimate any opponent. This attitude is for me one of the reasons why he became such a champion.
Fed is 32 and Nadal is 27. Big difference. fed was not losing to 100+ players int he most prestigious major two years in a row.
It's one thing to underestimate them...It's another to say I have to play the best tennis of my life to beat them....That is just PR BS!
You have to be very naive to think he believes that.
I bet when Fed said them fanboyish things about Rafa, he when to the back and grabbed a bucket asap.
Novak's the same, "Rafa's the greatest etc...or "Fed's the greatest etc..." it's great PR.
No I will not!
I believe it's the way he was educated.
Maybe it's a way to stay focus all the time, I dunno, after reading his autobiography you have to say this guy is really not the "normal" guy, he is extremely insecure. He's probably 10 times more insecure than a guy like Sampras.
I believe it's the way he was educated.
Maybe it's a way to stay focus all the time, I dunno, after reading his autobiography you have to say this guy is really not the "normal" guy, he is extremely insecure. He's probably 10 times more insecure than a guy like Sampras.
Then why didn't he give credit to Soderling and Rosol when they beat him?
Then why didn't he give credit to Soderling and Rosol when they beat him?
Novak made laugh my S off when he said Rafa for him was the best or greatest of all time, after beating him at Indian Wells in 2011. It made Rafa laugh too and just said no no that's not true.
I agree. Novak should of declared himself as the GOAT. 8)
Lol, you cannot be serious
That's almost two years old. And it was in response to some comments by Fed which weren't exactly friendly.
Lol, so true
They must be so disappointed, lol.
and here's how Nadal returns the favor :roll:
Nadal criticizes Federer for lack of support
“For him, it’s good to say nothing,” Nadal said in comments translated from Spanish. “Everything positive. ‘It’s all well and good for me, I look like a gentleman,’ and the rest can burn themselves. Everyone is entitled to have their own opinions.”
http://tennis.si.com/2012/01/15/nadal-criticizes-federer-for-lack-of-support/
:cringe:
I bet Roger is still lingering in the ATP circuit because he knows that there are still favorable chances of grabbing 18th and thus, keeping Rafa away from record.
Rafa like Roger has some arrogance in him too. We all have it esp if you happen to be very good at something and then unexpectedly lose to someone you're not expected to lose to.
Rafa's not perfect. Deal with it.
He did Rosol credit though, he said Rosol played "unbelievable" tennis in the 5th set and gave him no chance.
Fed is 32 and Nadal is 27. Big difference. Federer was not losing to 100+ players int he most prestigious major two years in a row when he was 27.
It's one thing to underestimate them...It's another to say I have to play the best tennis of my life to beat them....That is just PR BS!
You have to be very naive to think he believes that.
No doubt! Not only is Nadal's false modesty nauseating, it is clearly cover for extreme arrogance and self-belief, as well as a pre-emptive tactic used to psyche his opponents out. Remember how irritated Roger used to get by Nadal persistently deeming him the favorite prior to their encounters on clay in 2006/2007.
Fed also was not beating his main rival at slams at 27.
Crisstti, you are one of my favorite Nadal fans here, because I think you are quite fair, while supporting your player.
But, on this comment, I would like to say, that Fed's rival was also five years younger and entering his prime/peak at that time, as Federer headed out of his.
Nadal's chief rival now is only a year younger, and while Nadal has played more matches than Djokovic, the mileage is no where near the difference that Federer has with Nadal.
Five years in tennis is a long time.
Well, I was answering to a hater
But still, while what you say it's true (though Rafa is roughly the same age Fed was in 2008 or 9), managing to rather consistently beat a main rival who had had his number for a while and lost big matches against is something that Rafa has and Fed doesn't, while being more consistent (QF and semis streaks for example) is something which Fed has over Rafa.
Well that's rich coming from a Federer hater. LMAO!
Why bring this up? Did you even read the thread? Did you see what post I was responding to.
The guy was criticizing Fed for losing to 100+ ranked players at age 32...It's funny how you completely ignored that and jumped on me, calling me a hater :roll: Typical double standards!
Oh, if you think I sound anything remotely similar about Federer to how you do about Rafa, you're more delusional than I thought.
You are a hater. Are you actually trying to deny it?.
Please! Anybody that does not worship your false "God" Nadal is a hater...All I've done is quote facts and interviews of your hero and his uncle.
seriously, I thought this thread started out as a compliment from Fed to Nadal... Yet, it's devolved into Fed fanatics trashing Nadal....