Federer : WTF is the absolute best of the best tournament out there

[mike danny]

also you can call masters exho's as well. the top players do not put their all everytime to win a masters. sometimes they tank in order to prepare for bugger tournaments.

for ex: how come murray and djokovic tanked at paris if the masters are so well abovve the WTF?

 

[THUNDERVOLLEY]

So funny to read that Nadal 'fans' pretend they don't care, because Nadal will have an early exit as usual. Every lousy Nadal fan will claim they don't care because the tournament isn't important, like always!!! LOLLLLLLLLL.

...and you promised to leave this board forever if Nadal won another non-clay major.

Remember:

I already said that I will never return on this forum if Nadal wins a slam outside RG. On top of this, if Nadal wins this US Open, I will litterally eat my own ****

Difficult to honor your promise?

 

[Tennis Fanatic 070]

...and you promised to leave this board forever if Nadal won another non-clay major.

Remember:



Difficult to honor your promise?

I already said that promise was void due to the use of alcohol during the time I wrote that. I have left this forum for over a month btw.

 

[The Dark Knight]

Best of 5 is arguably easier than best of 3. In best of 5 you have time to warm and find your rhyme, best of 3 you need to be at your best right off the bat

The fact is no one has had so many walkovers in a slam win and no one has even made a final of the WTF losing 2 matches in the RR. So it's irrelevent until it happens. No other tournament forces you to play your first match against a top 8 player or potentially top 4 player.

It's the roughest draw possible. The idea of the round robin format is to find the best 4 players of the top 8 by pitting them against only other top 8 players. You need to prove yourself against the toughest competition. Odd that you don't respect that after all your weak era crap.

Y
O
U

C
A
N
N
O
T

B
E

S
E
R
I
O
U
S

 

[Tennis Fanatic 070]

I can't wait dor the WTF to start, I don't like Murray nor his annoying mum, but I hope he will be fit 3,5 weeks from now and play this amazing tournament.

Depending on Feds rating, I think it's possible there will be a 'group of death' with Nadal (or Djokovic if he's back on the number one spot), murray and Federer compete against each otherin round Robin. That would be amazing!! Can't wait!!!!!

 

[The Dark Knight]

I can't wait dor the WTF to start, I don't like Murray nor his annoying mum, but I hope he will be fit 3,5 weeks from now and play this amazing tournament.

Depending on Feds rating, I think it's possible there will be a 'group of death' with Nadal (or Djokovic if he's back on the number on spot), murray and Federer competent in round Robin. That would be amazing!! Can't wait!!!!!

When does it start?

 

[90's Clay]

Hmm.. Yea probably cause thats where he is at his best tennis wise.

The YEC isn't nearly the best out there. Especially these days when top players (generally over the past 7-8 years) aside from Federer and Agassi during his final days, take the YEC Off focus and level wise. Nadal went hard for the YEC maybe once or twice, I don't think Murray has EVER gone hard for it, Nole did last year.. But overall the WTF has been a tournament the top players just show up for for a payday and get ready for the AO.

It USED to be tournament with prestige that top guys went for but not in the past 10 years or so. Hell Ive seen more scrub alternates play that tournament (Stepenak and company) then I saw before that

 

[Omega_7000]

It USED to be tournament with prestige that top guys went for but not in the past 10 years or so.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha Oh yeah lemme guess...It was prestigious when sampras won it but lost it's prestige right about the time Federer started winning it? :lol:

 

[timnz]

Hmm.. Yea probably cause thats where he is at his best tennis wise.

The YEC isn't nearly the best out there. Especially these days when top players (generally over the past 7-8 years) aside from Federer and Agassi during his final days, take the YEC Off focus and level wise. Nadal went hard for the YEC maybe once or twice, I don't think Murray has EVER gone hard for it, Nole did last year.. But overall the WTF has been a tournament the top players just show up for for a payday and get ready for the AO.

It USED to be tournament with prestige that top guys went for but not in the past 10 years or so. Hell Ive seen more scrub alternates play that tournament (Stepenak and company) then I saw before that

You need to come up with evidence that Players aren't putting in their best effort in this event. I haven't seen any evidence of that....all I have seen is the opposite of that.

Also alternates have been rare indeed in the last 10 years. And when they have been included you could hardly call the number 9 or 10 player in the world a 'scrub'.

2011 - Tipsarević

You mentioned Stepenak - who else in the last 10 years?

 

[Nathaniel_Near]

He's saying it's the most elite tournament because only the very top ranked players contest it.

 

[Death Master]

they throw a lot of money at these players. big names like nadal and fed get massive appearance fees under the table also.


so of course players will say great things about this event.

 

[adil1972]

N
A
D
A
L

W
I
L
L

N
E
V
E
R

W
I
N

A

W
T
F

dont say that about nadal,

he has proved his critics wrong many times

 

[msc886]

That's right. Can someone here tell me the answer?

Can you lose twice and still win this tournament?

There's more than 1 way to play the game. Is this too difficult for your one-dimensional mind?

 

[furryballs]

you can lose twice and still win the tourny!you can lose once and win the tourny!so easy yet nads cant do it.so easy

 

[RF20Lennon]

When does it start?

the week after Paris

 

[The Dark Knight]

the week after Paris

Thanks.

I'll try and watch it.

 

[RF20Lennon]

Thanks.

I'll try and watch it.

seriously watch it! whatever your opinion maybe, its still the most stylish and well set up tournament out there. It's really like a concert. The 02 arena my personal favorite of all the arenas

 

[Povl Carstensen]

Thanks.

I'll try and watch it.

And maybe then you could post an opinion about it. Could've saved some other people some hazzle....

 

[The Dark Knight]

And maybe then you could post an opinion about it. Could've saved some other people some hazzle....

Don't waste time with exhibitions

All that matters is slams...the rest is just entertainment .

 

[rodrigo_palacio88]

Don't waste time with exhibitions

All that matters is slams...the rest is just entertainment .

right.

becausa that , federer is very far of nadal in goat terms , record not only with the numer of slams , record of matches , consecutive semis and quarters and more

 

[RF20Lennon]

Don't waste time with exhibitions

All that matters is slams...the rest is just entertainment .

The whole sport is just for entertainment. It has no other meaning. If no one watched the sport, none of this would matter. The WTF is a prestigious tournament, players play year round to qualify for!

 

[FedererWinsWimbledon2014]

The whole sport is just for entertainment. It has no other meaning. If no one watched the sport, none of this would matter. The WTF is a prestigious tournament, players play year round to qualify for!

TDK is trolling.

Also WTF is amazing at the o2.

 

[TMF]

right.

becausa that , federer is very far of nadal in goat terms , record not only with the numer of slams , record of matches , consecutive semis and quarters and more

The pain must be killing him.



Player of the decade
2000 - 2009: Federer
1990 - 1999: Sampras
1980 - 1989: Lendl
1970 - 1979: Borg
1960 - 1969: Laver

Most GS titles
1. Roger Federer 17*
2. Pete Sampras 14
3. Rafael Nadal 13*
4. Björn Borg 11
5. Jimmy Connors 8
= Ivan Lendl 8
= Andre Agassi 8
8. John McEnroe 7
= Mats Wilander 7
10. Dkokovic 6*
= Stefan Edberg 6
= Boris Becker 6

GS finals
1. Roger Federer 24*
2. Ivan Lendl 19
3. Pete Sampras 18
= Rafael Nadal 18*
5. Björn Borg 16
6. Jimmy Connors 15
= Andre Agassi 15
8. John McEnroe 11
= Mats Wilander 11
= Stefan Edberg 11
=Novak Djokovic 11*

Consecutive GS finals
1. Roger Federer 10*
2. Roger Federer 8
3. Rafael Nadal 5*
4. Andre Agassi 4
= Rod Laver 4
= Novak Djokovic 4*
7. Jimmy Connors 3
= Andy Murray 3*
= Björn Borg 3
= Björn Borg 3
= Björn Borg 3
= Ivan Lendl 3
= John McEnroe 3
= Ivan Lendl 3
= Ivan Lendl 3
= Mats Wilander 3
= Jim Courier 3
= Jim Courier 3
= Pete Sampras 3
= Rafael Nadal 3*


GS semi-finals
1. Roger Federer 33*
2. Jimmy Connors 31
3. Ivan Lendl 28
4. Andre Agassi 26
5. Pete Sampras 23
6. Rafael Nadal 21*
= Novak Djokovic 21*
7. John McEnroe 19
= Stefan Edberg 19
9. Boris Becker 18
10. Björn Borg 17


Consecutive GS semi-finals
1. Roger Federer 23*
2. Novak Djokovic 14*
3. Ivan Lendl 10
4. Ivan Lendl 6
= Nadal 6
6. Novak Djokovic 5*
= Andy Murray 5*
= Boris Becker 5
9. Roger Federer 4*
= Rod Laver 4
= Tony Roche 4
= John McEnroe 4
= Andre Agassi 4
= Jim Courer 4
= Nadal 4*


GS quarter-finals
1. Jimmy Connors 41
2. Roger Federer 40*(41 if not for walk-over in 2004)
3. Agassi 36
4. Ivan Lendl 34
5. Pete Sampras 29
6. John McEnroe 26
= Stefan Edberg 26
7. Novak Djokovic 26*
8. Rafael Nadal 25*
9. Boris Becker 23
10. Björn Borg 21

Consecutive GS quarter-finals
1. Roger Federer 36*
2. Ivan Lendl 14
= 3. Novak Djokovic 18*
4. Rafael Nadal 11
5. = Andy Murray 11*
6. Pete Sampras 10
7. Ivan Lendl 7
= Mats Wilander 7
10. Andre Agassi 6
= Rafael Nadal 6*

All Four Slams Per Year
Rod Laver 1969

Three Slams Per Year
Jimmy Connors 1974
Mats Wilander 1988
Roger Federer 2004
Roger Federer 2006
Roger Federer 2007
Rafael Nadal 2010
Novak Djokovic 2011


All Four Finals Per Year
Roger Federer 2006
Roger Federer 2007
Roger Federer 2009
Rod Laver 1969

All Four Semi-finals Per Year
Rod Laver 1969
Ivan Lendl 1987
Roger Federer 2005
Roger Federer 2006
Roger Federer 2007
Roger Federer 2008
Roger Federer 2009
Rafael Nadal 2008
Novak Djokovic 2011
Novak Djokovic 2012
Novak Djokovic 2013
Andy Murray 2011

Most consecutive matches won at one Grand Slam event:
1. Björn Borg (Wimbledon), 41
2. Roger Federer (Wimbledon), 40(41 if not for walk-over in 2007)
= Roger Federer (US Open), 40
4. Pete Sampras (Wimbledon), 31
= Rafael Nadal (French Open), 31


Most Grand Slam match wins
1. Roger Federer 259*
2. Jimmy Connors 233
3. Andre Agassi 224
4. Ivan Lendl 222
5. Pete Sampras 204

Other Stuff:

Year-End Championships
1. Roger Federer 6*
2. Ivan Lendl 5
= Pete Sampras 5
4. Ilie Nastase 3
= John McEnroe 3
= Boris Becker 3

Most Year-End Championship finals
1. Ivan Lendl 9
2. Federer 8*
= Boris Becker 6
4. Pete Sampras 6
5. Ilie Năstase 4
= Bjorn Borg 4
= John McEnroe 4
= Andre Agassi 4
9. Lleyton Hewitt 3

Most Weeks at #1
1. Roger Federer 302*
2. Pete Sampras 286
3. Ivan Lendl 270
4. Jimmy Connors 268
5. John McEnroe 170
6. Björn Borg 109
7. Rafael Nadal 102*
8. Novak Djokovic 99+*
9. Andre Agassi 101
10. Lleyton Hewitt 80


Consecutive Weeks at #1
1. Roger Federer (1) 237
2. Jimmy Connors (1) 160
3. Ivan Lendl (1) 157
4. Pete Sampras (1) 102
5. Jimmy Connors (2) 84
6. Pete Sampras (2) 82
7. Ivan Lendl (2) 80
8. Lleyton Hewitt (1) 75
9. John McEnroe (1) 58
10. Rafael Nadal (1) 56

Year End #1
1. Sampras 6
2. Federer 5*
3. Borg 4
4. Connors 3
= Lendl 3
= McEnroe 3


Highest Season Winning Percentage
1. John McEnroe (1984) .965 82–3
2. Jimmy Connors (1974) .959 93–4
3. Roger Federer (2005) .953 81–4
4. Roger Federer (2006) .948 92–5
5. Björn Borg (1979) .933 84–6
6. Ivan Lendl (1986) .925 74–6
7. Roger Federer (2004) .925 74–6
8. Ivan Lendl (1985) .923 84–7
9. Ivan Lendl (1982) .922 106–9
10. Björn Borg (1980) .921 70–6
= Novak Djokovic (2011) 0.921 70-6

Most ATP Titles
1. Jimmy Connors 109
2. Ivan Lendl 94
3. Roger Federer 77*
= John McEnroe 77
5. Björn Borg 64
= Pete Sampras 64
7. Guillermo Vilas 62
8. Andre Agassi 60
9. = Rafael Nadal 60*
10. Boris Becker 49

Most Master Series or equivalent win
1. Rafael Nadal 26(mostly 3 set final)
2. Ivan Lendl 22
3. Roger Federer 21
4. John McEnroe 19
5. Andre Agassi 17
= Jimmny Connors 17
7. Bjorn Borg 15
8. Novak Djokovic 14
9. Boris Becker 13
10. Pete Sampras 11

Consecutive Match Win Streak
1. Björn Borg 49 1978
2. Björn Borg 48 1979–80
3. Guillermo Vilas 46 1977
4. Ivan Lendl 44 1981–82
5. Novak Djokovic 43 2010–11
6. John McEnroe 42 1984
7. Roger Federer 41 2006–07
8. Thomas Muster 35 1995
= Roger Federer 35 2005
10.Jimmy Connors 33 1974

 

[THUNDERVOLLEY]

The trivia list rears its head again, but it serves the most important purpose of all: Federer could not win the supreme tennis achievement of the Grand Slam.

 

[Povl Carstensen]

The trivia list rears its head again, but it serves the most important purpose of all: Federer could not win the supreme tennis achievement of the Grand Slam.

This to me is more the definition of trivial.

 

[Povl Carstensen]

Don't waste time with exhibitions

All that matters is slams...the rest is just entertainment .

So you are not going to watch it anyway?

 

[TMF]

The trivia list rears its head again, but it serves the most important purpose of all: Federer could not win the supreme tennis achievement of the Grand Slam.

And experts use those criteria to rank their placement in goat.

1 Roger Federer
2 Rod Laver
3 Pete Sampras

1 Steffi Graf*
2 Martina Navratilova*
3 Margaret Court*
4 Chris Evert*
5 Billy Jean King*

 

[THUNDERVOLLEY]

This to me is more the definition of trivial.

...if one has no understanding of history.

 

[Povl Carstensen]

...if one has no understanding of history.

I just find it funny when someone unconsciously personify the very traits they attribute to others.

 

[tennisaddict]

The pain must be killing him.



Player of the decade
2000 - 2009: Federer
1990 - 1999: Sampras
1980 - 1989: Lendl
1970 - 1979: Borg
1960 - 1969: Laver

Most GS titles
1. Roger Federer 17*
2. Pete Sampras 14
3. Rafael Nadal 13*
4. Björn Borg 11
5. Jimmy Connors 8
= Ivan Lendl 8
= Andre Agassi 8
8. John McEnroe 7
= Mats Wilander 7
10. Dkokovic 6*
= Stefan Edberg 6
= Boris Becker 6

GS finals
1. Roger Federer 24*
2. Ivan Lendl 19
3. Pete Sampras 18
= Rafael Nadal 18*
5. Björn Borg 16
6. Jimmy Connors 15
= Andre Agassi 15
8. John McEnroe 11
= Mats Wilander 11
= Stefan Edberg 11
=Novak Djokovic 11*

Consecutive GS finals
1. Roger Federer 10*
2. Roger Federer 8
3. Rafael Nadal 5*
4. Andre Agassi 4
= Rod Laver 4
= Novak Djokovic 4*
7. Jimmy Connors 3
= Andy Murray 3*
= Björn Borg 3
= Björn Borg 3
= Björn Borg 3
= Ivan Lendl 3
= John McEnroe 3
= Ivan Lendl 3
= Ivan Lendl 3
= Mats Wilander 3
= Jim Courier 3
= Jim Courier 3
= Pete Sampras 3
= Rafael Nadal 3*


GS semi-finals
1. Roger Federer 33*
2. Jimmy Connors 31
3. Ivan Lendl 28
4. Andre Agassi 26
5. Pete Sampras 23
6. Rafael Nadal 21*
= Novak Djokovic 21*
7. John McEnroe 19
= Stefan Edberg 19
9. Boris Becker 18
10. Björn Borg 17


Consecutive GS semi-finals
1. Roger Federer 23*
2. Novak Djokovic 14*
3. Ivan Lendl 10
4. Ivan Lendl 6
= Nadal 6
6. Novak Djokovic 5*
= Andy Murray 5*
= Boris Becker 5
9. Roger Federer 4*
= Rod Laver 4
= Tony Roche 4
= John McEnroe 4
= Andre Agassi 4
= Jim Courer 4
= Nadal 4*


GS quarter-finals
1. Jimmy Connors 41
2. Roger Federer 40*(41 if not for walk-over in 2004)
3. Agassi 36
4. Ivan Lendl 34
5. Pete Sampras 29
6. John McEnroe 26
= Stefan Edberg 26
7. Novak Djokovic 26*
8. Rafael Nadal 25*
9. Boris Becker 23
10. Björn Borg 21

Consecutive GS quarter-finals
1. Roger Federer 36*
2. Ivan Lendl 14
= 3. Novak Djokovic 18*
4. Rafael Nadal 11
5. = Andy Murray 11*
6. Pete Sampras 10
7. Ivan Lendl 7
= Mats Wilander 7
10. Andre Agassi 6
= Rafael Nadal 6*

All Four Slams Per Year
Rod Laver 1969

Three Slams Per Year
Jimmy Connors 1974
Mats Wilander 1988
Roger Federer 2004
Roger Federer 2006
Roger Federer 2007
Rafael Nadal 2010
Novak Djokovic 2011


All Four Finals Per Year
Roger Federer 2006
Roger Federer 2007
Roger Federer 2009
Rod Laver 1969

All Four Semi-finals Per Year
Rod Laver 1969
Ivan Lendl 1987
Roger Federer 2005
Roger Federer 2006
Roger Federer 2007
Roger Federer 2008
Roger Federer 2009
Rafael Nadal 2008
Novak Djokovic 2011
Novak Djokovic 2012
Novak Djokovic 2013
Andy Murray 2011

Most consecutive matches won at one Grand Slam event:
1. Björn Borg (Wimbledon), 41
2. Roger Federer (Wimbledon), 40(41 if not for walk-over in 2007)
= Roger Federer (US Open), 40
4. Pete Sampras (Wimbledon), 31
= Rafael Nadal (French Open), 31


Most Grand Slam match wins
1. Roger Federer 259*
2. Jimmy Connors 233
3. Andre Agassi 224
4. Ivan Lendl 222
5. Pete Sampras 204

Other Stuff:

Year-End Championships
1. Roger Federer 6*
2. Ivan Lendl 5
= Pete Sampras 5
4. Ilie Nastase 3
= John McEnroe 3
= Boris Becker 3

Most Year-End Championship finals
1. Ivan Lendl 9
2. Federer 8*
= Boris Becker 6
4. Pete Sampras 6
5. Ilie Năstase 4
= Bjorn Borg 4
= John McEnroe 4
= Andre Agassi 4
9. Lleyton Hewitt 3

Most Weeks at #1
1. Roger Federer 302*
2. Pete Sampras 286
3. Ivan Lendl 270
4. Jimmy Connors 268
5. John McEnroe 170
6. Björn Borg 109
7. Rafael Nadal 102*
8. Novak Djokovic 99+*
9. Andre Agassi 101
10. Lleyton Hewitt 80


Consecutive Weeks at #1
1. Roger Federer (1) 237
2. Jimmy Connors (1) 160
3. Ivan Lendl (1) 157
4. Pete Sampras (1) 102
5. Jimmy Connors (2) 84
6. Pete Sampras (2) 82
7. Ivan Lendl (2) 80
8. Lleyton Hewitt (1) 75
9. John McEnroe (1) 58
10. Rafael Nadal (1) 56

Year End #1
1. Sampras 6
2. Federer 5*
3. Borg 4
4. Connors 3
= Lendl 3
= McEnroe 3


Highest Season Winning Percentage
1. John McEnroe (1984) .965 82–3
2. Jimmy Connors (1974) .959 93–4
3. Roger Federer (2005) .953 81–4
4. Roger Federer (2006) .948 92–5
5. Björn Borg (1979) .933 84–6
6. Ivan Lendl (1986) .925 74–6
7. Roger Federer (2004) .925 74–6
8. Ivan Lendl (1985) .923 84–7
9. Ivan Lendl (1982) .922 106–9
10. Björn Borg (1980) .921 70–6
= Novak Djokovic (2011) 0.921 70-6

Most ATP Titles
1. Jimmy Connors 109
2. Ivan Lendl 94
3. Roger Federer 77*
= John McEnroe 77
5. Björn Borg 64
= Pete Sampras 64
7. Guillermo Vilas 62
8. Andre Agassi 60
9. = Rafael Nadal 60*
10. Boris Becker 49

Most Master Series or equivalent win
1. Rafael Nadal 26(mostly 3 set final)
2. Ivan Lendl 22
3. Roger Federer 21
4. John McEnroe 19
5. Andre Agassi 17
= Jimmny Connors 17
7. Bjorn Borg 15
8. Novak Djokovic 14
9. Boris Becker 13
10. Pete Sampras 11

Consecutive Match Win Streak
1. Björn Borg 49 1978
2. Björn Borg 48 1979–80
3. Guillermo Vilas 46 1977
4. Ivan Lendl 44 1981–82
5. Novak Djokovic 43 2010–11
6. John McEnroe 42 1984
7. Roger Federer 41 2006–07
8. Thomas Muster 35 1995
= Roger Federer 35 2005
10.Jimmy Connors 33 1974

This post should be made as a sticky thread. Something like a 'home' page on TTW. Everyone should be made to read and acknowledge this before they make any posts.

 

[THUNDERVOLLEY]

I just find it funny when someone unconsciously personify the very traits they attribute to others.

Astounding. No description could be as irrelevant as the one above. You were trying to be clever, but it was falling apart before you clicked on "submit reply."

 

[The Dark Knight]

So you are not going to watch it anyway?

Sure I'll watch it.....but I'll also watch the WWF and the UFC .

It's all entertaining .....but what I care about now is the AO and the rest if the slams.

But yeah.....I'll watch it .

 

[Tennis Fanatic 070]

The whole sport is just for entertainment. It has no other meaning. If no one watched the sport, none of this would matter. The WTF is a prestigious tournament, players play year round to qualify for!

Exactly, which is why that post of the dark troll is probably the dumbest post in history of dumb posts.

By pretending he doesn't care about the WTF he tries to make Nadal look better. It's a shame he's to ignorant to see that everybody knows exactly what's he's doing here. Guess it's the age though so you really can't blame him.

 

[Tennis Fanatic 070]

How could anyone be a fan of Nadal after this, WOW!!!

 

[TMF]

This post should be made as a sticky thread. Something like a 'home' page on TTW. Everyone should be made to read and acknowledge this before they make any posts.

I wish it was a sticky thread, because some haters will think twice before making foolish comments without being aware of the fact. Since it will not be a sticky thread, I will repost once in awhile to keep them in check.

 

[THUNDERVOLLEY]

Trivia is simply that....trivia.

 

[Deleted member 307496]

Trivia is simply that....trivia.

The word "trivia" basically means facts that are of little or no importance, it is derived from the word "triviality" which translates into pettiness.

 

[Tennis Fanatic 070]

^^ BURN!!

10 Burns for TV

 

[THUNDERVOLLEY]

The word "trivia" basically means facts that are of little or no importance, it is derived from the word "triviality" which translates into pettiness.

...which fits the use of that list like a glove.

 

[TMF]

^^ BURN!!

10 Burns for TV

10 and counting.

 

[The Dark Knight]

How could anyone be a fan of Nadal after this, WOW!!!

I love it !!!!

 

[Murrayfan31]

How could anyone be a fan of Nadal after this, WOW!!!

He must've had a muscle spasm. No other excuse for that kind of behavior.

 

[THUNDERVOLLEY]

How could anyone be a fan of Nadal after this, WOW!!!

....and your problem with that is....?

 

[Tennis Fanatic 070]

I love it !!!!

That's what I would have expected from a 13 year old fanboy. For your information; the humping moves he makes, that's how people make babies (you will find out some day at school or when when your parents give you a certain book). For now, all you need to know is that it doesn't belong on a tennis court.

 

[NEW_BORN]

Yikes! I can only imagine what Xisca has to go through in bed to please this man :twisted:

 

[NEW_BORN]

....and your problem with that is....?

 

[TheTruth]

Wouldn't have seen it if you weren't watching a player that you hate so much.

Televisions and computers or whatever outlet people choose to keep up with tennis, doesn't come with straitjackets and electric chairs.

You're not forced to watch anyone, so to ease your own pain, you shouldn't watch.

Or, if you choose to watch, then don't complain, because you made a voluntary decision of your volition.

Why complain to others over a willful decision that you made?

 

[The Dark Knight]

That's what I would have expected from a 13 year old fanboy. For your information; the humping moves he makes, that's how people make babies (you will find out some day at school or when when your parents give you a certain book). For now, all you need to know is that it doesn't belong on a tennis court.

No .....I like a rebel. My favorite all time players are Connors , Mcenroe ,Safin.....

I respect all players ; however the depressed mannerisms of a Sampras for example is just not my style.

This is what made the Borg Mcenroe rivalry so great and the Nadal Federer rivalry so great. The clash of styles both in play and in personal style.

Why can't you appreciate both? Why do you have to hate ?

If there is a up there must be a down , a Ying a Yang, a front and a back ...... And a Federer and Nadal......

It's natural and the two together is poetry in motion .

 

[Tennis Fanatic 070]

No .....I like a rebel. My favorite all time players are Connors , Mcenroe ,Safin.....

I respect all players ; however the depressed mannerisms of a Sampras for example is just not my style.

This is what made the Borg Mcenroe rivalry so great and the Nadal Federer rivalry so great. The clash of styles both in play and in personal style.

Why can't you appreciate both? Why do you have to hate ?

If there is a up there must be a down , a Ying a Yang, a front and a back ...... And a Federer and Nadal......

It's natural and the two together is poetry in motion .

Nadal is no rebel, he is a p.ervert Not only due to the above clip, but also due to the fact that he constantly picks his *** and willy. It's disgusting. I also like Safin, McEnroe and Connors, but they are not remotely the same as Nadal.