Federer / Nadal and djokovic difference

[Luiz Felipe]

Federer and Nadal ,are what we call tennis geniuses. They make shots that nobody can predict or even think about it.

Djokovic in the other hand is not a genius but he is maybe the most efficient player ever , he does almost everything really good. However, We know what he will do and how.

And that's why people like Federer and Nadal more.

 

[ForumMember]

Thanks for creating a thread on topic hitherto unexplored.

 

[Third Serve]

Maybe they're all genuises? That's what it's gonna take to develop the game to stay at the top for such a long time.

 

[Deleted member 77403]

Lol what?

 

[OhYes]

Federer and Nadal ,are what we call tennis geniuses. They make shots that nobody can predict or even think about it.

Djokovic in the other hand is not a genius but he is maybe the most efficient player ever , he does almost everything really good. However, We know what he will do and how.

And that's why people like Federer and Nadal more.

So this is your thought of the day - 2 geniuses could be eclipsed by some predictable dude.

 

[BeatlesFan]

Federer and Nadal ,are what we call tennis geniuses. They make shots that nobody can predict or even think about it.

Most tennis historians, fans and pundits will agree that tennis has produced two geniuses: McEnroe and Federer. Nadal is not a tennis genius, nor is anyone else currently playing aside from Roger. That's just sort of basic Tennis 101. Watch Mac's matches from 1981-84 and you'll understand what people are talking about. Nadal and Nole could wind up with 30 slams and become GOAT, but neither are tennis geniuses.

 

[alexio]

Lol what?

 

[6august]

Most tennis historians, fans and pundits will agree that tennis has produced two geniuses: McEnroe and Federer. Nadal is not a tennis genius, nor is anyone else currently playing aside from Roger. That's just sort of basic Tennis 101. Watch Mac's matches from 1981-84 and you'll understand what people are talking about. Nadal and Nole could wind up with 30 slams and become GOAT, but neither are tennis geniuses.

Mac is overrated.He's even not more talented than Borg.

 

[Russeljones]

There's an unwritten rule here. If you make a post attempting to say something novel about the big 3, you're a qualified twerp.

 

[ChaelAZ]

Fed and Nad...GOAT Champioins.
Djo...third wheel interloper.

 

[Deleted member 77403]

Fed and Nad...GOAT Champioins.
Djo...third wheel interloper.

Yet he beat them both in back to back years at Wimbledon in two of most mentally clutch matches of all time.

 

[uscwang]

So the two genetic Goats couldn't handle Novak's shots, which are predictable even to you?

So Novak put the shots in their head but out of their reach?

Federer and Nadal ,are what we call tennis geniuses. They make shots that nobody can predict or even think about it.

Djokovic in the other hand is not a genius but he is maybe the most efficient player ever , he does almost everything really good. However, We know what he will do and how.

And that's why people like Federer and Nadal more.

 

[Fedr and three others]

Hit to the backhand, no? Unpredictable genius, if only Djokovic could do that.

 

[helterskelter]

Most tennis historians, fans and pundits will agree that tennis has produced two geniuses: McEnroe and Federer. Nadal is not a tennis genius, nor is anyone else currently playing aside from Roger. That's just sort of basic Tennis 101. Watch Mac's matches from 1981-84 and you'll understand what people are talking about. Nadal and Nole could wind up with 30 slams and become GOAT, but neither are tennis geniuses.

Maybe Lew Hoad?

 

[dr325i]

Yet he beat them both in back to back years at Wimbledon in two of most mentally clutch matches of all time.

You forgot to offer a tissue to the person you replied to...

 

[Djokodal Fan]

Enlightening thread OP !

 

[zep]

Most tennis historians, fans and pundits will agree that tennis has produced two geniuses: McEnroe and Federer. Nadal is not a tennis genius, nor is anyone else currently playing aside from Roger. That's just sort of basic Tennis 101. Watch Mac's matches from 1981-84 and you'll understand what people are talking about. Nadal and Nole could wind up with 30 slams and become GOAT, but neither are tennis geniuses.

Genius lmao. Being able to hit a tennis ball doesn't require any genius. You could call it a talent but that's also an overused word. Everyone essentially learns to play in a certain way and that's how you end up playing. Wasn't Federer hitting double handed backhands as a kid? or was it Sampras? Regardless, if they stayed that way all these single handed genius snobbery wouldn't be there.

 

[BH40love]

Federer Djokovic Nadal aré good at tennis

 

[alexio]

The chess genius José Raúl Capablanca learned to play chess at age 4, just observing his father's games.

he was a genius indeed. i can add that considering his great achievements if he had spent as much time working on chess as alekhine and lasker did, he would have even better results, he didn't need to work that hard unlike other greats

 

[Lew II]

Next level:

Kyrgios is a genius. Djokovic is not.

 

[weakera]

These maestronian "genius" terminology circle jerks always make me a little nauseous

 

[Towny]

It all depends on what you mean by genius. But Novak is not just some guy who does everything well. He has exceptional point construction and a clever game plan. The fact that he was able to succeed against Nadal on clay, where everyone else had failed, is a testament to that.

 

[Mainad]

Federer and Nadal ,are what we call tennis geniuses. They make shots that nobody can predict or even think about it.

Djokovic in the other hand is not a genius but he is maybe the most efficient player ever , he does almost everything really good. However, We know what he will do and how.

And that's why people like Federer and Nadal more.

Hmmm.....you really think Djokovic can't come up with shots nobody could predict or think about? He's been doing it his whole career.

 

[Mainad]

Next level:

Kyrgios is a genius. Djokovic is not.

In which case, one can only conclude that 'genius' is massively overrated.

 

[serve]

Beethoven was the greatest, Mozart the ultimate genius, but none could compare to Bach )