Good videos

zill

Legend
My most extreme was semi western. I’ll try index knuckle on bevel 4.5, heel pad on 4 both fh and bh.

It's perfectly fine to drive the ball with a strong grip and heavy racquet. Look at Djokovic and Fognini. Wawrinka as well.
 

user92626

G.O.A.T.
Question for everyone:

Can you watch an opponent who has beaten you good from the back to see his games, running, etc to learn his weaknesses?
 

Curious

G.O.A.T.
Maybe they have cut out all the good stuff for a highlight and accidentally used the leftover for us.
Interesting. They’re not pushers but there’s a lot of unnecessary silly over hitting. Look at the return errors. They have zero mindset to just return it. It FIRST needs to go in. As Rick Macci says, if you get your racket on the ball it has to go in no matter how you return it. In other words you need to be a pusher when it comes to return of serve!
 
Last edited:
Aren’t these players too inconsistent for 4.0 level?

Technically no, they would make fewer errors versus 3.5s and win enough to get bumped to 4.0. They wouldn't be dismissed as not 4.0 if they played 4.0, but they have issues with deep balls hit to their feet. You were right to notice they overhit, they need a mental coaching on when to go for it and when to play a neutral ball.
 

Curious

G.O.A.T.
What I meant is no footwork whatsoever in between hits. By contrast look at Graf starting at 2:17 how much footwork there is between hitting two balls coming right back at her.

The more steps the better?
How about as many steps as needed?
 

zill

Legend
The more steps the better?
As someone who has been criticized for their footwork all their lives, yes.


I guess it's called not wanting to be caught flat footed which is what Sock was displaying in the previous vid. Here is Fognini hitting also balls pretty much hit to him below but his feet are very active ready to move if required.



Also here

 
As someone who has been criticized for their footwork all their lives, yes.


I guess it's called not wanting to be caught flat footed which is what Sock was displaying in the previous vid. Here is Fognini hitting also balls pretty much hit to him below but his feet are very active ready to move if required.



Also here

Remember that active != moving a lot, active = staying light.
 
What I meant is no footwork whatsoever in between hits. By contrast look at Graf starting at 2:17 how much footwork there is between hitting two balls coming right back at her.

Yup, I understand, I often play with no footwork whatsoever, I've been accused of looking like I am not trying quite often.
 

Curious

G.O.A.T.
Does Fernando Gonzales fh have elements of WTA fh?
Like this guy, Andrew’s. The one talking, started the match closer to the camera.


 

Curious

G.O.A.T.
Okay so its the part where you've sunk into your stance after the toss. Yeah it seems obviously not necessary. I feel like it probably developed because some people felt the wider swinging helped counterbalance for more consistent toss.
It’s actually that “arm, elbow, racket” structure just before the drop starts. I was referring to how players get there from the start of serve motion. See in 2021 Alcaraz racket was travelling around the world before getting there. Then someone must’ve told him that he didn’t actually need to do that. Just take it straight up to the trophy position. Just like Roddick used to do.
 
It’s actually that “arm, elbow, racket” structure just before the drop starts. I was referring to how players get there from the start of serve motion. See in 2021 Alcaraz racket was travelling around the world before getting there. Then someone must’ve told him that he didn’t actually need to do that. Just take it straight up to the trophy position.
I mean Federer has already sunk into his stance in the picture you showed me? Agreed with what you were saying, the difference in racquet path in Alcaraz side by side was easy to see, I was just speculating why it became a thing.
 

Curious

G.O.A.T.
I mean Federer has already sunk into his stance in the picture you showed me? Agreed with what you were saying, the difference in racquet path in Alcaraz side by side was easy to see, I was just speculating why it became a thing.
Some people say it’s a nice rhythm when you take the racket up to trophy with a back swing first. I suspect it just makes the serve more complicated. Think about an overhead, do you take the racket up with a backswing? Or straight up? I don’t quite like how the female pro does it in the video posted earlier, I think it’s too extreme but I like the Alcaraz or Roddick way. Nice and simple.
 
Last edited:
Some people say it’s a nice rhythm when you take the racket up to trophy with a back swing first. I suspect it just makes the serve more complicated. Think about an overhead, do you take the racket up with a backswing? Or straight up? I don’t quite like how the female pro does it in the video posted earlier, I think it’s too extreme but I like the Alcaraz or Roddick way. Nice and simple.
Yeah exactly. What is that rhythm getting them at that point in the sequence?
 

zill

Legend

goat 2hb. He is just hitting some random 2bh here that I assume he does not practice seriously but you can see the potential.

What could Fed have achieved if he switched to a 2hb like me?
 
Top