Henin's mental toughness way overrated!

Does anyone else find Henin Hardennes mental toughness overrated? What is it based on, the only match she showed great mental toughness vs another mentaly tough player was her 2003 U.S Open semis vs Capriati. That was a great demonstration of mental strength, but that is the only time she has shown it vs a mentaly tough opponent, yet people rave about her almost unprecedanted mental toughness. I actually find that one of her weaknesses if everything. She seems to have a very complete game, and worked hard despite her small size to be a powerful hitter from various areas of the court. In addition to being injured I find her meek in the clutch if anything though.

She lost 3 of her 4 slam finals this year, despite being favored by most in 3 of them(the first 3)and atleast co-favored in the 4th(U.S Open final this year). Ok maybe she was sick in the Australian final but her play was a major case of nerves, even if she was sick. How can somebody who goes 1-3 in slam finals vs not exactly the most outstanding competition you will see(it is not like she played Serena Williams or Monica Seles in her prime in all the finals and went 1-3, that I could understand)say that she is such a mentaly tough player?

3 of her 5 slam finals wins where vs her countrywomen Kim Clijsters who pretty much faints at the sight of her for some reason, and is known to have a huge mental block playing Henin, so those wins would not show great mental resolve. Also the one final that was close, the 2004 Australian Open is worth nothing, since Henin lost a 6-3, 4-2 lead in the second set, losing 4 straight games to lose the set 6-4, then ran off 4 straight games to go up 4-0 in the 3rd on Clijsters, then lost both breaks of serve by losing 3 straight games(including 2 serve games)for Kim to be back on serve at 4-3, before finishing it off by winning the last 2 games. Both Kim and Justine showed some major problems with nerves, focus, and intensity in that match. The other 2 slam final wins were vs a nervous and older Mary Pierce, and Kuznetsova a moderate contender but not really one of the top guns.

She also seems to resort to other means of helping herself through some tough matches, rather then digging down in her much belied mental reserves. The 2003 French Open semis where she won 7-5 in the 3rd in the semis over Serena, ending Serena's 4 grand slam win streak, she allowed her own level of play to go down drasticaly after playing impeccable clay court tennis in winning the first set 6-2. Serena also raised her game alot, but Justine despite playing on her own best surface, Serena's worst, leading Serena 2-1 head to head on clay(never beaten her on any other surface)and having won their last match 6-4, 6-3, allowed her game to go progressively backwards after the first set, which is not a sign of great mental toughness at all. Then when that continued into the 3rd set, to get back on track she used a cheating tactic down 4-2 of raising her arm up, while the crowd were already getting on Serena's case, pretending she was not ready for the serve, then denying she did it, and forcing Serena into a second serve. If her mental strength was so irrefutable would she not have just dug deep in her bottomless mental reserves, rather then resort to such a cheapish tactic. Also when she played Serena at Wimbledon 1 month later, while she was overpowered and outplayed in a 6-3, 6-2 loss she actually had many chances to make it a more competitive match as she let 3 different 0-40 leads(2 on Serena's serve, 1 on her own I believe)go away, dumped a makeable volley in the net anther break point, and it appeared to be looser focus whenever she got up 40-0, again if anything showing lack of intensity and focus. Also that she played big points so poorly and was so submissive in her approach to what she must have known to be a grudge match were Serena would want to wallop her after the French Open, makes me think less of her so called mental resolve. During that 2004 Aussie Open final vs also used cheating, a hand up on a ball she saw was in on break point to go up 5-3 on Clijsters, if she is so tough and such a special competitor, why does she resort to such cheap tactics to get up in matches.

I have seen her lose some big leads to people like Dementieva, including 1 this year at Pacific Life, she gagged a 6-2, 5-2 lead. She also gagged a 6-2, 4-0 lead to Venus at Amelia Island I believe it was 4 years ago.

She is NOT as mentaly tough as people make her out to be, not even close.
 

Lleytian3

Semi-Pro
Really now?!?! so she won 5 slams, how exactly then.

You obviously dont play tennis becuase if you did you would kno that tennis is 50% mental 50% physical. everybody that is a decent tennis player knows that for a fact.

Is it really easy to play against your countrywoman, and you dont think that messes with you mentally? are you stupid. its like playing one of your friends , it isnt an easy thing.

i forgot who she lost in the WO final, but the USO final, maria sharapova wasnt a great player. so winning WO at the age of 17, which btw is the most prestigious GS in tennis, is a walk in the park then. sure...

you talk about how she blow big leads to. That doesnt mean she is mentally weak, maybe her game dropped or the other player got the momentum. they are many reasons for blowing a big lead. it does happen. guillmerio coria is a prime example.

please think before you post
 

jmsx521

Hall of Fame
My comment is about JHH's mental toughness off the court:

JHH came back after a big illness that sidelined her for... wasn't it about a year or so? JHH came back from laying ill on a bed, watching the tour on TV, back to the top... and did that better than Seles did after the stabbing. JHH did that kind of a-la-Muster, whose career was thought to be over after his leg injury. To be sidelined for such a long time and to come back to the top takes lots of mental toughness, particularly that she doesn't rely on her physical strength (since she's one of the skinniest players on the tour).
 

Alexandros

Professional
Lleytian3 said:
you talk about how she blow big leads to. That doesnt mean she is mentally weak, maybe her game dropped or the other player got the momentum. they are many reasons for blowing a big lead. it does happen. guillmerio coria is a prime example.

please think before you post

Maybe YOU should think before you post. Coria is a HORRIBLE example, he choked that French Open final against Gaudio. The match was entirely his.
 
henin is simply not the player she was in 2003. and she played against some good competition in the slam finals this year. the level of competition in the womens game is better than its ever been. monica and serena(and she did) would get spanked. maria will end up with a boatload of slams.
 

Lleytian3

Semi-Pro
Alexandros said:
Maybe YOU should think before you post. Coria is a HORRIBLE example, he choked that French Open final against Gaudio. The match was entirely his.

how is it a bad example idiot. he choked which mean he doesnt lack mental toughness which was my point. not only that. gaudio stepped it up big time and played like he did, that got him to the finals. coria level of play dropped too. you didnt even explain why it is a bad example. since when does choking mean you lack mental toughness. nadal choked when he played federer in the miami masters. he has one of the best mental games out there. you are an idiot.
 

flying24

Banned
breakfast_of_champions said:
henin is simply not the player she was in 2003. and she played against some good competition in the slam finals this year. the level of competition in the womens game is better than its ever been. monica and serena(and she did) would get spanked. maria will end up with a boatload of slams.

The level of competition in the womens game is better then ever? You must be joking right. Serena from 2002-2003 would dominate all the current women, except for maybe Justine on clay only. Venus from 2002-2003, or Justine from 2003-early 2004 would even be a clear #1 vs the current womens field. Davenport of 98-2000 was playing at a higher level then the current top women.

Serena getting spanked? Didnt an extremely out of shape Serena, who is only doing tennis as a part time hobby these days, take World #1 and 2-time slam winner this year Amelie Mauresmo to 3 sets and bagel her in the middle set. Is that your definition of being spanked. Womens game so high Monica or Serena at their peak would be spanked, hogwash!

Maria will end up with a boatload of slams? I sincerely hope that is not part of an argument to try to demonstrate the incredable standard of womens tennis right now. :confused:
 

flying24

Banned
newnuse said:
Prime William sisters, prime Seles would dominate today..... how soon we forget.

I agree. Justine showed she could do well vs the Williams in their primes on clay, but not on any other surface, I believe she is 4-2 vs them on clay, but 0-12 or something on other surfaces. Mauresmo did not do well vs the Williams in their primes on any surface, period. Clijsters ditto, and on those times she came close to winning a big match vs one she choked, like she has done tons of times in ugly final losses to Henin that the original poster speaks of. Sharapova lost 5 straight slam semis between her 2 teenage slam titles.
 

SoBad

G.O.A.T.
Henin is one of my favorite female players, but I was a little bit surprised with the USO final when she hit so many balls into the net. Is that a sign of nerves?
 
flying24 said:
The level of competition in the womens game is better then ever? You must be joking right. Serena from 2002-2003 would dominate all the current women, except for maybe Justine on clay only. Venus from 2002-2003, or Justine from 2003-early 2004 would even be a clear #1 vs the current womens field. Davenport of 98-2000 was playing at a higher level then the current top women.

Serena getting spanked? Didnt an extremely out of shape Serena, who is only doing tennis as a part time hobby these days, take World #1 and 2-time slam winner this year Amelie Mauresmo to 3 sets and bagel her in the middle set. Is that your definition of being spanked. Womens game so high Monica or Serena at their peak would be spanked, hogwash!

Maria will end up with a boatload of slams? I sincerely hope that is not part of an argument to try to demonstrate the incredable standard of womens tennis right now. :confused:

not joking, just read the results in the womens game over the last few years. the women games deeper than ever. any reasonable person will agree with that. you got players like the williams, hingis, davenport, vidasova, jankovic, who are low seeded and lurking in the draws.at some point in time, your going have to stop making excuses, and accept that williams, hingis, davenport are simply inferior players. they've played and they were beaten. and yes, i expect maria to end up with more slams than any of the current players, and be considered by the experts, along with graf, and navratilova, as the best ever. of course, there wll still be some peolpe making excuses.
 

dh003i

Legend
Despite that all, JHH is clearly the best female player today. She has been to all of the slam finals, and has won one of them. That's better than any other woman in the WTA.

Although she's certainly not the Roger Federer of the WTA -- or perhaps only in style, but not in consistency and mental strength -- she's still the best female player.

Sorry, lets quit it with all the Williams worshipping. They're a couple of has-beens who aren't dedicated to the game. I really don't care about all of their "out of shape" or "injured" excuses.
 
How is Henin clearly the best for the year. Would you rather have 1 slam title and 4 slam finals, or 2 slam titles and 2 slam finals? Also that 4th final they both lost to the same player, one in the semis and one in the finals, so in a way it is not fair to count that as a 2nd slam final Henin makes that Mauresmo does not, fairer to think of that as a more equal result, neither better then the other.
 
breakfast_of_champions said:
your going have to stop making excuses, and accept that williams, hingis, davenport are simply inferior players.

Nobody is saying Hingis, Davenport, and the Williams are not inferior players now to the very best like Mauresmo, Henin, Sharapova, and Clijsters. It would be unfair though to say the Williams, and to a lesser extent Davenport, were inferior players at their peak today, so it depends what you are referring to, how they are now, or how they were at their peak. Have you seen the Williams and Davenport between 98-2002? They put the hurt on the ball like no women can come close to doing today, Davenport had the cleanest purest strokes you could find, and the Williams combined incredable defensive skills with their dominating power games.
 

dh003i

Legend
lambielspins,

You're right, and marks my ignorance of the woman's game. In that case, clearly Henin is the best female player. GS wins trumps all else.
 
I am a huge Justine fan and it was frusterating to watch her lose so many big matches this year, and not perform up to her level in alot of those. Still to reach all 4 slam finals in 1 year is a huge achievement, and atleast she did win her pet slam at the French, her 3rd title there in 4 years marking her dominance there. She still should be proud of her year and if she reaches #1 for the year I would not question she deserves it all, despite Mauresmo winning 1 more slam, in alot of ways Justine still had the best year, although I could see an argument for Mauresmo as well. Sharapova also had a great year, Clijsters and Kuznetsova close behind. I hope she can analyze a way to give herself a better shot in those finals next year though. Knowing her competitiveness I know she would not be happy with a 1-3 record in slam finals this year.
 
Top