I've been working on hitting a lower trajectory for when I have an open court. I still hit high looping shots when rallying but need to improve putting ball away.
That was the first thing that caught my attention also but thought it was full Western.Wow your grip looks almost Hawaiian these days. Can you make it a little more conservative?
Wow your grip looks almost Hawaiians these days. Can you make it a little more conservative?
Are you trying to hit more winners [either the opponent can't touch or the ball doesn't come back] or more forceful setup shots? I'm not big on "more winners" because it will usually also lead to more errors; rather, I try to hit more aggressively to the same big target and treat it like a setup shot that generates a weak reply when I can move in. If it happens to be a winner, so much the better. But it's not my priority.
man, i know you are working very hard but somehow you still look lazy.
Doesn't seem like there's much on the shots after the ball lands.
Yes but that grip makes it harder to put the ball away. I don't have a great putaway forehand either because of my grip, but I'm three quarters to full western, not almost Hawaiian.I have moved it more towards Hawaiin in the last year or so, I can hit more consistent with it.
I personally think you would benefit from a slower swing. Also try to hit the ball with as little effort as possible it takes to get ball over the net. You do not need that much energy to expend to get the ball to fly fast or hard.
I personally think you would benefit from a slower swing. Also try to hit the ball with as little effort as possible it takes to get ball over the net. You do not need that much energy to expend to get the ball to fly fast or hard.
He'd have to change his grip as well then. With that extreme of a grip, you need to have a faster swing speed than other forehand grips.
your stroke is fine... it's footwork that needs the attention.I filmed at the end after hitting 300 ground strokes in 105 heat index, and yes I was being lazy by that time.
When I get tired I just work on the stroke technique in a lazy way as shown here.
IMO he jjust needs a shorter backswing.I personally think you would benefit from a slower swing. Also try to hit the ball with as little effort as possible it takes to get ball over the net. You do not need that much energy to expend to get the ball to fly fast or hard.
I personally think you would benefit from a slower swing. Also try to hit the ball with as little effort as possible it takes to get ball over the net. You do not need that much energy to expend to get the ball to fly fast or hard.
Hey Tim. You are a strong fit guy. I’m sure you’ve tried before but an Eastern or SW grip would make your shots consistent and very very tough to deal with for your opponents.
I agree, but not sure this would work for him, he seems to use a bent arm and all his stroke speed comes mainly from rotating his body into the ball, he is not really used to hitting with a fluid kinetic chain type of swing with alot of lag and release like Federer.
@tlm alot of your shots are still with a very high arc and too much spinny too little penetration, but of course it takes alot of practice to master something, I would however advise you to try to lower the trajectory, even if you hit the ball into the net more than you want, try to exagerate to get the feeling.
The shot at 0:24 is your best one, really good one, focus on hitting like that, has nice arc and penetration.
IMO he jjust needs a shorter backswing.
and practice making contact with 1 or both feet inside the court, follow into net.
the extreme western grips in general, promote a, "hang out at the baseline until you make a mistake" style of game... personally that's why i switched from hawaiian to SW, to make it easier to drive the ball on short balls. but depends on your personality (ie. i like dictating and controlling, even if it means i make more errors, but hopefully my winers/err ratio is better than my opponent)
your stroke is fine... it's footwork that needs the attention.
in general, the closer you get to the net, the shortening the backswing,Do you think a shorter backswing would help? Your right about working on footwork more.
in general, the closer you get to the net, the shortening the backswing,
a) helps with timing (you have less of it)
b) helps with controlling pace... a fast swing from a short backswing reduces rhs, without feeling like you're "slowing down you're stroke" (think pinball plunger pulled back half way)
alternatively, you can still try to take a very fast swing on an inside the court short ball, but that takes quite alot of timing and practice... but the advantage is you can get the ball "up and down" quicker with more topspin,... vs. "pseudo placeing it" with a half swing groundie... but don't be surprised if you shank alot.
helps to know both techniques, as there are times you will have time, and times that you won't have time... or something in the middle
You seem to get almost no racquet lag, then you yank up with a bent arm, most of your RHS comes very late in the stroke.
If it works for you, all is good.
You look very strong, so do not hurt me.
IMO, I think you're actually hitting with too much topspin. Hitting a "lower" trajectory doesn't help with your current stroke because it lands short, which won't work well as a putaway ball unless you're going for sharp angles. If you want to hit through the court then you need to flatten the ball more. It's the only way to hit a low trajectory shot AND land deep at the same time.
IMO, I think you're actually hitting with too much topspin. Hitting a "lower" trajectory doesn't help with your current stroke because it lands short, which won't work well as a putaway ball unless you're going for sharp angles. If you want to hit through the court then you need to flatten the ball more. It's the only way to hit a low trajectory shot AND land deep at the same time.
He does have racket lag. Stop worrying about micro moves of the arm abd wrist when the real problem is that he is not using the bottom half of the kinetic chain. Swing should be built from the ground up, not vice versa.
hehe, well, as your opponent, i'm doing everything i can to make you not have enough timeInteresting take, personaly don't shorten the backswing close to the net if I have enough time to do a normal backswing.
Not really seeing the wrist fully ahead of the racquet.What do you mean by no racket lag?
I see your point but I think if I can lower the trajectory when I have an open side of the court then I will take time away from opponent. Sometimes by the ball not going as deep can be an advantage and especially creating angles like you mentioned.
Many times when I get the open court I put to much loop in the shot which gives to much time for opponent to recover. So I believe if I can lower trajectory more in those times it will work to my advantage.
hehe, well, as your opponent, i'm doing everything i can to make you not have enough time
if you're so fast, that you always have time to take a full swing... more power to you,...
let's say i hit a good ball, that you're slicing back... i know it's gonna be short, just don't know how short... sometimes i rob myself of time, by getting too close, and forces me to hit a half back stroke fh (ie. enough time where i don't have to hit a half volley/volley, but not enough time that i can take a full backswing)..
anywho, my $0,02.
lots of ways to solve that problem:
* go to net less often (ie. only go in when you can take a full stroke approach shot)
* half volley
* slice
I agree, but not sure this would work for him, he seems to use a bent arm and all his stroke speed comes mainly from rotating his body into the ball, he is not really used to hitting with a fluid kinetic chain type of swing with alot of lag and release like Federer.
Woh woh, where did you come to the conclusion that “bent arm” was anti “fluid kinetic chain”. I have a bent arm AND lag and my kinetic chain is pretty sweet (I was told by a coach the other day my FH was similar to Nadal’s but without the chopper finish) so I’m concerned that your statement is interpreted as truth when it’s not! Sorry
TLM due to the nature of your grip and swing your shot is always going to have some loop so I wouldn’t worry about trajectory so much.
But for what you are doing it looks like you are burning a lot of effort on every stroke. I don’t know why or what it is - I DO know you can hit harder and win more spin (believe it or not) with LESS effort. That is what I would work on.
Trajectory? BS. You have a solid stroke, I’d concentrate on the above and how to use it in a match
I never get bored of watching this junior's videos. Excellent early preparation, lightning fast unit turn.Something looks very wrong with this stroke.
It reminds me of a rubber band powered toy where you pull /twist it, to load it up, then let it go, and it snaps forward.
Like a catapult or something.
You're wild and it seems very inefficient
Does this stroke work in match play when balls aren't sitters from a machine ?
You're also late on some of these balls, and going wide (on a slow ball machine feed)
I think your racket prep is late and slow (I have had the same issue, so I see it)
You wait and integrate your slow backswing prep into your swing.
This is why you are rushed, even for the slowest balls.
The swings at :43 and 1:02 seemed the most natural and not forced