If Federer, Nadal, Djokovic and Murray were separated by different eras...

Djokodalerer31

Hall of Fame
Yes! This is yet another purely hypothetical would coulda topic, but whatever...there are gazillions of them here posted every day, one more won't make much of a difference! So let's dig ourselves into this hypothetical rabbit hole, shall we? Let's say for example Djokovic and Murray never cross paths with Fedal and the two decades more or less play out traditionally with Fedal coming on the scene first to dominate tennis starting as early as 2000 or 2001 having each other as rivals, just like Sampras and Agassi before them, then Djokovic and Murray taking over in 10's decade to dominate having each other as main rivals, while Fedal both simultaneously retiring from tennis say in 2011 or 2012! Yes an entire era of Djokovic and Murray dominating tennis and splitting slams left and right is nightmar-ish thought, considering how many people on these forums consider their tennis boring, but whatever, we aren't considering entertain,ment value here at all just stats! How do you see their respective grand slam tally to play out, Murray would have definitely won way more in that situation, but so would Djokovic as well, would Murray have went double digits? Or would he win just a couple more with Djokovic swapping the rest and some occasional one-two slam wonders winning once in a while? Would Nadal have won more than Federer in 00's decade? What about their h2h? Discuss!
 
Top