Murray could win a calendar slam against these lot.Forget Fed, what about Murray? I love Murray but he was just a minor nuisance to the big 3, to NextGen players he would be a dominant force that makes them quiver in fear.
well he did pretty well as a geriatric veteran in his 30s against these guys. You dont think he would at least do as well if he were in his peak years? What nonsense.Probably less, Nadal and Djokovic would have stopped him more.
Anyhow, this is a discussion based on unstestable speculation. We cannot create a time machine to put young Federer to play against same aged Nadal and Djokovic, as well as Zverev, Thiem, Kyrgios and the likes.
Probably less, Nadal and Djokovic would have stopped him more.
I love Murray but he was just a minor nuisance to the big 3, to NextGen players he would be a dominant force that makes them quiver in fear.
As a tennis player your job is to win as many matches and tournaments as you can. This generation has won nothing significant at all. Hence the term "losers", because they dont win tournaments. So what do you want me to call them when they consistently lose? Are they winners in your eyes when they cant compete for majors?Calling someone a "loser" when he is an extremely succesfull athlete + all the benefits coming with it ....
Just so you know, inteligent people would brand you as an " idiot "
Imagine 03-09 Roddick against this field. He would maybe push 6 Wimbledons.
As a tennis player your job is to win as many matches and tournaments as you can. This generation has won nothing significant at all. Hence the term "losers", because they dont win tournaments. So what do you want me to call them when they consistently lose? Are they winners in your eyes when they cant compete for majors?
when you've been touted and heavily promoted as the best of your generation then you are supposed to win the big trophies. What you are implying is like calling a player like Berdych a loser for not winning slams. Well hes not the best of his generation so you cant fault him for that. On the other hand you have these young guys who are the best of their generation and they cant even compete. Pathetic if you ask me, that an entire generation can go slamless.If this true than everyones job aim should be to become a CEO .. if they dont, than they are loosers .., No?
This is the real weak era. Djokodal have benefited the most. There has never been a younger player to expose their decline.
Pathetic if you ask me, that an entire generation can go slamless.
The thread should be Lost Gen. Thiem and backwards are just starting. It wouldn't have been pretty for Fraud I suspect as we already found out in his recent Kokkinakis match. Zverev at age 20 would have destroyed Fed at the same age. I see with the OP Mensa let one of its members loose on TTW.