I Am Finnish
Bionic Poster
Lol will Tsitsipas help medvedev ?And the Mad Lad needs Tsitsipas to beat Nadal to make it.
Lol will Tsitsipas help medvedev ?And the Mad Lad needs Tsitsipas to beat Nadal to make it.
FRI, 15 NOV 2019Lol will Tsitsipas help medvedev ?
Depends on NadalFRI, 15 NOV 2019
SINGLES ANDRE AGASSI / 02:00 PM
NADAL
VS
TSITSIPAS
SINGLES ANDRE AGASSI / 08:00 PM
MEDVEDEV
VS
ZVEREV
If Nadal wins then Medvedev knows he's out, he tanks to spite Rafa. If Nadal loses then of course Medvedev will beat Zverev in two sets. Mad Lad a master of TTW logic, so no way for Nadal to get out of Round Robin.
LOL. Tsitsipas will tank for sure:Depends on Nadal
If Nadal beats Tsisipas 2-0 and Zverev beats Medvedev 2-1 so both Nadal and Zverev will have a set ratio of 4-3, who will advance in this scenario? Does we have to consider the percentage of games won in this case?
would classify to the semifinals because he leads the H2H over Rafa in the tournament.
Well, so far Medvedev has played poorly under pressure.Just checked. Bad news is Nadal-Tsit is scheduled ahead of Med-Zed. It makes huge difference.
1. If Nadal wins against Tsit, Med would be out of tournament. He would have no motivation to beat Zed and in the likely scenario of Zed win, Nadal is out of WTF.
2. If Nadal loses to Tsit. Med would still have chance to make it to SF. He would be motivated to win against Z and in that case Zed might lose, but Nadal is out of WTF even before the match started.
I don't see Nadal making it ti SF.
Now it's all upto GOAT in other group. Hope he cleans Djokovic.
Oh my gosh. All these different scenarios you guys are listing are making my head spin.
it is not unfair as the 2 groups are not necessarily equally strong.A moral victory would be Djokovic classifying with 2 victories and Nadal getting eliminated with 2 victories. Same merits, different benefits. Which prove the rules of this tournament are completely unfair.
It should be:
Same merits = same benefits.
I am sure some years a player in group A may have classified with only 1 victory while a player in group B has not classified with 2 victories.
From your lips to Medvedev’s ears!FRI, 15 NOV 2019
SINGLES ANDRE AGASSI / 02:00 PM
NADAL
VS
TSITSIPAS
SINGLES ANDRE AGASSI / 08:00 PM
MEDVEDEV
VS
ZVEREV
If Nadal wins then Medvedev knows he's out, he tanks to spite Rafa. If Nadal loses then of course Medvedev will beat Zverev in two sets. Mad Lad a master of TTW logic, so no way for Nadal to get out of Round Robin.
Thats true. Interestingly with the same performance, beating Tsit in 3rd rubber, he would be either #1 in group or #3 in group.If Nadal beats Tsitsi and Med beats Zverev is he #1 of the group?
That would probably mean facing Novak in the semi, so Novak needs to win the tournament regardless of what Nadal does, to be #1.
Yes. Nadal can only advance as the #1, not #2.If Nadal beats Tsitsi and Med beats Zverev is he #1 of the group?
That would probably mean facing Novak in the semi, so Novak needs to win the tournament regardless of what Nadal does, to be #1.
i was always thinking the same, but in the link to the ATP the OP gave, it's made clear that it's not a 3-way tie anymore if not all 3 players are tied in set percentage.I think you have skipped game percentage which comes before H2H in 3 player ties. See Point 4 below:
2019 ATP Finals – Singles - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Standings are determined by:
1) Number of wins;
2) Number of matches;
3) In two-players-ties, head-to-head results;
4) In three-players-ties, percentage of sets won, then percentage of games won, then head-to-head results;
5) ATP rankings
Are you sure? Wow that's actually very cool That means we'd be guaranteed a Djokodal or a Fedal in semi AND one of the young gen in final.Yes. Nadal can only advance as the #1, not #2.
Okay, then it makes sense that Nadal can only be 1st or 3rd.i was always thinking the same, but in the link to the ATP the OP gave, it's made clear that it's not a 3-way tie anymore if not all 3 players are tied in set percentage.
now i don't know if this interpretation of the rules was changed only this year or had been like that already before and they only improved the wording now.
one could check the YEC results of the last couple years. maybe that reveals it.
This is all Zverev's fault
I mean it’s no slam since you can technically win the title with just 3 match wins but you’d still land 3 top 10 wins which is pretty good considering players like Nadal won slams without facing a top 20 player...
Nadal should withdraw from this joke of a "tournament" and start getting prepared for AO where he doesn't have to depend on anybody, all players have to win 7 matches in order to win it. Let Djokovic have this YE#1, it means more than slams for him and his fans.
They are right though. So Djokovic can classify winning 2 group matches but Nadal can't classify winning 2 group matches? The tournament is a joke.
there are regularly teams already qualified after 2 games and can tank the last one.In football at the wc the last matches are played at the same time, so no team has the advantage to know what result it needs to advance. At the wtf it is not really fair competition
Okay, then it makes sense that Nadal can only be 1st or 3rd.
I only remember one occurence where game percentage mattered. In 2009 Federer and Del Potro eliminated Murray this way. But I checked and they were all 3 tied in sets percentage, so no H2H could come into play anyway. Indeed, quite astonishingly all 6 Matches in that group went to 3 sets.
You are wrong, in the current situation games won are irrelevant. If a two way tie is broken by sets won percentage in such a way that two players are still tied, H2H decides between those two.I don't think OP considered games won percentage, which have to be considered before H2H in case of a 3-way tie.
These are the scenarios i can think of:
1. Zverev wins , Nadal loses - Nadal is out due to having worse record with tsitsipas taking 1st and Zverev taking 2nd.(regardless of the scoreline in both matches.)
2. Zverev wins in 2, Nadal wins - Nadal is out regardless of scoreline, 1st position for tsitsipas if nadal wins in 3, but it will depend on aggregate ratio of no. of games won by tsitsipas and zverev if Nadal wins in 2.
3. Zverev wins in 3, Nadal wins - if Nadal wins in 3, he is out with tsitsipas taking 1st and Zverev taking 2nd. If Nadal wins in 2, he has a chance to qualify in 2nd poition ahead of Zverev based on aggregate ratio of no. of games won after 3 matches.
4. Medvedev wins , Nadal wins - Nadal and tsitsipas qualify with Nadal taking 1st position and tsitsipas 2nd(regardless of scoreline).
5. Medvedev wins in 2, Nadal loses - Medvedev takes 2nd position regardless of the scoreline.
6. Medvedev wins in 3, Nadal loses - Zverev qualifies in 2nd position regardless of scoreline.
Currently, games win/loss for Nadal and Zverev is - 25/28 and 17/18 respectively, for tsitsipas it is 25/15 , so I would say tsitsipas has practically qualified but it can get really close between Zverev and Nadal