Ariel said:
I should not honor Melissa's post with an answer, but I can't let it pass... NO ONE on this posts can compare with the #500 ATP ranked player... To think otherwise is dellusional... But we do not have to be able to beat a player to comment on his/her game. Please keep that in mind before rushing to post something like that. That is childish logic and any poster here will not be drag into a discussion of such low level.
Exactly Ariel....I wasn't going to dignify such a childish knee-jerk post with a response, but I'm glad you did. It's sure great to see someone field that kind of post with such well spoken maturity.
I'm sure it was clear, but as stated, I was comparing Roddick(and Becker)to dominant #1 players. Also, I in no way stated that Roddick was only a serve. I said his wonderful serve will keep him in contention for a long time. That's a compliment. I've said before, defending Roddick, that serve is the most important part of the game. I said in a previous post, that if the game were rally only, Roddick would struggle to be in the top 40(his forehand is a big weapon, but overall his baseline package would be vulnerable) BUT THE GAME IS NOT RALLY ONLY. The serve is the most important shot, if you could only have 1 great shot, pick the serve. I wouldn't fault anyone for having a serve good enough to take them far even if they really did have nothing else at all.
A person like Melissa probably cannot understand this, but I'm merely making the point that historically, qualities like timing, balance, versatility and feel were the most important aspects in great tennis. We lost sight of that a little bit as power became such a visible and dominant part of the game. Fed and Sampras though, have both proved that those other things haven't gone out of style.
Were I Roddick's coach, I would be working on those things as my main focus. Not his volley, not his backhand. Both those strokes and his forehand as well would be improved when the other qualities improved. A slight deficit in these things is what makes a touch more inconsistency creep into ARod's game. Andy's great when he gets the right balls, when he's forced to improvise more on the run or off balance, he'll start to look jerky and erratic. His improved fitness helped a lot, because then he could expend more energy making sure he got to the ball perfectly and set up well. But, he'll never beat the BEST guys off the ground(and he doesn't have to BEAT them off the ground, just hold even and let his serve make the difference)
consistently unless he improves those things.....anyways I digress....and people dont' want to hear this anyways! lol
and of course, I do agree with the posters who point out that his achievments are all relative. He has a grand slam title, nobody can take that away. At the end of his career, I'll applaud him for that, even if he never gets another. But I speak of him with the idea in mind of him becoming one of the all time greats because that's what I assume he is trying to become and it is the next level for a young man who already has won a slam title to aspire to.