Michael Jackson Vs Prince: Who Ya got?

Who ya got?

  • The King of Pop

  • The Purple One


Results are only viewable after voting.

DreddyTennis45

Hall of Fame
This has probably come up a few times on here but it's pretty interesting to know who everyone thinks was better/more legendary.

For me it has to be MJ, he was just too iconic, I can't even think of one mediocre song he made; The dancing, the vocals the stage presence, he had everything.

Don't get me wrong Prince was a legend too (and credit to him for actually being able to play instruments unlike MJ) but the King of Pop was just on another planet

zombie-themed-casinos-michael-jacksons-plan-to-revive-his-falling-fortune.jpeg


prince-2004-purple-billboard-1548.jpg
 
C

Chadillac

Guest
I only liked purple rain from prince, almost all of Mj's stuff is great
 

mixtape

Professional
For me, Michael Jackson has a slight edge over Prince, but my wife would disagree, she's a HUGE Prince fan. Sometimes we would get into a discussion about these two artists. After the comparisons are shared, she reminds me before I head out to play what brand of tennis racquet I'm playing with... :eek: :(:)
 

Antonio Puente

Hall of Fame
As a musician, I would have to go Prince. Prince could play any instrument and could have done anything, any type of music.

Cultural impact, etc. - Mike.
 

BlueB

Legend
Prince. I realize mj was a pop sensation but I feel Prince had better songs and had a tennis racquet company.
Bwahahahaha ^ [emoji23][emoji28]
Priceless.

On a more serious note, I never understood people's obsession with MJ... Just watched a music video of him yesterday - great dancer and showman, but not much of a musician. Couldn't play an instrument or sing too well...

Sent from my SM-G930W8 using Tapatalk
 
Both had their moments.
Michael started off wayy earlier.
Prince had a better middle to his career and life.
Both had similar endings.

Music-wise, i do not listen to MJ. My wife does. I do like some tracks by Prince.

To my knowledge, Prince was a nice person. If he lived next door, i would let my kids take some guitar lessons from him. MJ, no thanks.
 

ojo rojo

Legend
https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/ind...ly-please-dont-try-to-argue-otherwise.589186/
Firstly, they were both mad as a box of frogs. And both the product of a golden era in American popular music; born smack in the middle of the century that gave us Jazz, Blues, Gospel, Rock and Roll, R&B, Funk, Soul; to name but a few of the advances in what people could create with a voice and a guitar or keyboard. Both Prince and Jackson were like a condensed and streamlined version of what came just before them. A rich musical diet packed with treats provided by the likes of Little Richard, James Brown, Stevie Wonder, Ray Charles, and later both influenced by the psychedelia of the Beatles and Hendrix.

Seems futile to debate which is better but that never stops anyone around these here forums..

Songwriting - Prince>>Jackson

MJ arguably had bigger hits but was nowhere near as prolific a tunesmith as Prince, which some may argue waters down the Prince back catalogue however Prince had some huge hits amidst the thousands of songs that he released. And furthermore wrote various global hits for other artists. MJ also used songwriting teams to pen some of his biggest numbers. Prince was always at the helm of that particular fundamental.

Musician - Prince>>Jackson

This one's fairly obvious. Aside from Prince's ability to play Piano/Drums/Bass and a variety of other such instruments, his mastery of electric guitar is really second to none. He was a highly respected guitarist, especially amongst other guitarists.

Singer - Prince>>Jackson

When Jackson first appeared in the early 70's, a small child with a huge voice, it was hugely impressive and clearly he had an immense talent. However after his peak period with the "Thriller" and "Bad" albums, he seemed to become a parody of himself vocally. The singing sounded weak and seemed to rely on studio production and an array of vocal quirks that became synonymous with the MJ sound. HEE HEE Shamon! etc... Prince not only has a much more powerful voice, capable of singing belting rock and gospel as well as the falsetto that became a trademark but technically he also has a superior range.

Dance - Jackson>>Prince

Prince was an amazing and acrobatic dancer but he didn't really break any new ground. He was essentially doing a "James Brown" albeit in 6 inch heels. Jackson seemed to have musical control of every fibre in his body. His movement was detailed down to the tiniest twitch and he could "glide" across the floor. MJ was much more switched on to the street dance craze of the early 80's.

It's subjective of course..
but for me personally... Prince Goat
13ynkwj.jpg
 

dgold44

G.O.A.T.
This has probably come up a few times on here but it's pretty interesting to know who everyone thinks was better/more legendary.

For me it has to be MJ, he was just too iconic, I can't even think of one mediocre song he made; The dancing, the vocals the stage presence, he had everything.

Don't get me wrong Prince was a legend too (and credit to him for actually being able to play instruments unlike MJ) but the King of Pop was just on another planet

zombie-themed-casinos-michael-jacksons-plan-to-revive-his-falling-fortune.jpeg


prince-2004-purple-billboard-1548.jpg

Very happy when I heard MJ was dead !!
Check out the hbo special on the most evil man in entertainment history
 

Adm

Rookie
I heard that this girl has met Michael Jackson when she was younger. This is why she prefers Prince (as the photo reveals)

When I write about "reveals" stay focused on the racquet (not lower please!)

9.jpg
 
D

Deleted member 716271

Guest
I will take the guy that didnt molest kids

(I do enjoy Michael's songs tho lol)
 
Both ripped off james brown. And did not live as long. Or as well. Well maybe prince did.

Vantaggio: Signore Prince.

Yknow who is the coolest james brown ripoff? Terence trent d'arby. Deserves a mention up in here.
 
very important to think about:

"which is that in an abusive pedophile relationship there is both love, affection, mentoring, friendship, caring — and there is sexual abuse. Those two things coexist."
 

MichaelNadal

Bionic Poster

And then he killed himself after Michael died.


This was the first huge one in 93, then the one in 03 had zero evidence and a million plot holes which is why he was aquitted. All the ones coming out since he died are just as bs as the rest, with no evidence besides pictures with Michael.

Michael had plenty of issues, but he was no child molester.
In fact he did more for kids than anyone could imagine, but reporting that wouldn't be fun at all.

21bc38ceea7bb666a12795d7bee2e496--michael-jackson-images-archangel-michael.jpg

Cu2sWF2XEAQ8p0c.jpg




It was the perfect thing to use against him because it was believable for those who did no research. Michael's fault for still being around kids after 93 though, that's on him, but still.
 
Last edited:
Top