McEnroeisanartist
Hall of Fame
If Nadal loses in or before the fourth round of the U.S. Open, and goes on to be the 2013 Year End #1, he will set the record for fewest Grand Slam matches won by a year end #1 in that calendar year.
Nadal and U.S. Open and Year End #1
- Thread starter McEnroeisanartist
- Start date
fed_da_man
Rookie
I think he loses in the QF or SF of the US Open and then does nothing the rest of the year. Highly unlikely he'll be YE #1
vive le beau jeu !
Talk Tennis Guru
a 1st round exit would be nice.
C
chandu612
Guest
What were Federer's stats after wimbly last year? Just curious
FreeBird
Legend
C
chandu612
Guest
We are talking only about Grandslam matches...In the question I asked, its about the last 4 grand slams
fed_da_man
Rookie
That's his grand slam W-L record for 2012 post Wimbledon. If you want to include US Open 2011, which makes no sense because this thread is about calendar year, then it's 22-3.
FreeBird
Legend
I dont get what exactly you are asking?Federer 17-2 From AO 12 to W 12
14-4 From USO 12 to W 13.
C
chandu612
Guest
Federer 17-2 From AO 12 to W 12
14-4 From USO 12 to W 13.
There you go Federer was 14-4 and was crowned No 1 when Djokovic was 25-2.
So what do you guys think, did Fed deserved the no.1 with bunch of Masters? Was he lucky to beat Sampras record of no.of weeks at no.1?
FreeBird
Legend
So you don't even look at the stats and pass your judgement. 14-4 is USO 2012-W 2013 record. Do you even follow tennis? Go to cricket forums and spare us. Fed was 22-3 for USO 11 to W 12. Plus he had WTF. The most prestigious tourney after GS. While Djokovic was 25-2. Pretty close. A case very different from Rafa-Djokovic.
Last edited:
C
chandu612
Guest
So you don't even look at the stats and pass your judgement. Do you even follow tennis? Go to cricket forums and spare us. Fed was 22-3 for USO 11 to W 12. Plus he had WTF. The most prestigious tourney after GS. While Djokovic was 25-2. Pretty close. A case very different from Rafa-Djokovic.
You are the one who took out 14-4 up from your ars*e. And Ferrer was 22-4 in 2012..What rank does that deserve?
FreeBird
Legend
Federer 17-2 From AO 12 to W 12
14-4 From USO 12 to W 13.
I clearly stated the period assuming that someone is not blind.
Another wrong stat. Ferrer was 18-4 in 2012. You first watch some matches, get your stats right and then talk. Or argue within your Bamos army. I won't respond anymore.
tacou
G.O.A.T.
Highly unlikely? Guy has not lost on HC all year and has a stranglehold on the race.
fednad
Hall of Fame
Straight from the heart Vive! ;-)
vive le beau jeu !
Talk Tennis Guru
... always !
Let me guess, you're a diehard Grandfatherer fan?
MichaelNadal
Bionic Poster
He's like the pro-Fed TDK.
powerangle
Legend
Please learn to read. Fed was 22-3 (in the period of question, when Roger ascended to #1 after Wimbledon 2012).
14-4 is for a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT YEAR (2012 to 2013)...and the poster even dated it for you to see. Again, learn to read before posting.
