DjokovicForTheWin
Banned
No more wikipaedia for a day. Can't even think
if you're really desperate, you can right-click and view source of the wiki page (first doing a search using google)...then you can kind of read it, through all the html tags...good luck!
Haha, good tip, but that html is hard to read. I found a much better way actually. Just view source as you said and then save the file to your desktop as filename.html. Then open it a browser. Voila
Press esc before the blackout.
You're welcome.
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1117130/Rafael-NadalIn 2005 Nadal set a record for a teenage male player by registering 11 tournament victories, including a triumph at his French Open (Roland Garros) debut, when he upset Federer in the semifinals
Haha, good tip, but that html is hard to read. I found a much better way actually. Just view source as you said and then save the file to your desktop as filename.html. Then open it a browser. Voila
Could be 0%, could be 100%. That's the point. I sometimes see people posting excerpts of articles here on pro players or whatever.DD, Just wondering but how affected will TT be if this bill passed?
Could be 0%, could be 100%. That's the point. I sometimes see people posting excerpts of articles here on pro players or whatever.
IF a large news conglomerate decides that newspapers aren't making enough money, and closes up shop, and moves to 100% online articles, they could feasibly decide to "charge a membership" (see NYT). If they decide that they want to milk the user for every last penny, they're going to be very aggressive with people copy/pasting partial (or full!) articles elsewhere online.
Assuming they have enough leverage, they could abuse these bills and get TTW (maybe even TW!) shut down as a site without having to go through a lengthy cease and decist and/or lawsuit. So... this would be the 100% case.
If the bill passes and people are chill (extremely unlikely), then there'd be likely no effect.
The problem with the bill is that it is not tackling the supposed problem (internet piracy). It is putting into place ridiculous policies that could completely undermine freedom of speech and other basic rights that we are taking for granted on a day to day basis. The point that wikipedia, reddit, slickdeals, the oatmeal, etc etc etc are trying to make is that we shouldn't take these freedoms/rights for granted. Do something about it (if it floats your boat).
For example (sort of extreme), if TW didn't notice someone posting pics in Shoes/Apparel of Nike's Winter 2012 gear and remove it fast enough, Nike could have the entire site taken down. Or someone post videos in Tennis Hint/Tips that is copyrighted - same thing - site gets shut down. Under DCMA (digital millenium copyright act) a 'takedown notice' would be filed to take the offending materials off. On Ars Technica they correctly called SOPA 'thermonuclear war to kill an insect' - pretty accurate. And I have been a software developer - so Piracy is something that bothers me. But needs to be addressed in a sensible way. The MPAA and RIAA are stuck in the Past and can't realize they need to change their business model.DD, Just wondering but how affected will TT be if this bill passed?
I wonder why google's logo is blackout, aren't they also a pro SOPA/PIPA supporter?. I think FB, twitter, YT should also do some kind of blackout, can you imagine how much more awareness of this bills if those websites did a blackout.
No, Google (as they should be) is definitely opposed to the bill(s). If FB/Twitter/YT went down, the point would be driven home, for sure. However, as it is, the publicity for ANYTHING SOPA/PIPA related is very low, as some of the big pushes for these bills are large media corporations
Most people just don't know what it's all about! I'm pretty sure if FB went down for even an hour or so twitter would go down from all the traffic about it
It's not just video and pics. If a poster even posts a LINK, ... the website is supposed to monitor each and every link posted -- that's what I've got, although I have just glossed it. The wikipedia page had an explanation.For example (sort of extreme), if TW didn't notice someone posting pics in Shoes/Apparel of Nike's Winter 2012 gear and remove it fast enough, Nike could have the entire site taken down. Or someone post videos in Tennis Hint/Tips that is copyrighted - same thing - site gets shut down. Under DCMA (digital millenium copyright act) a 'takedown notice' would be filed to take the offending materials off. On Ars Technica they correctly called SOPA 'thermonuclear war to kill an insect' - pretty accurate. And I have been a software developer - so Piracy is something that bothers me. But needs to be addressed in a sensible way. The MPAA and RIAA are stuck in the Past and can't realize they need to change their business model.