Order of prestige

[Autodidactic player]

Rank these ten accomplishments in order of prestige:

Australian open singles title;
French open singles title;
Wimbledon singles title;
US Open singles title;
Year-end championship singles title;
Being ranked year-end number one in singles;
Winning all Masters 1000/WTA Premier events in singles (over a career);
Winning an Olympic gold metal in singles;
Being a member of the Davis/Fed Cup winning team;
Being inducted into the International Tennis Hall of Fame.

 

[MLM]

1. AO, FO, W, UO
5. YEC
6. MS (Masters Slam)
7. YE #1
8. OGM
9. DC
10. HOF

Three observations

1. IUWTMA (I use way too many acronyms)
2. I really don’t no where to place winning all the masters given no-one has ever done it. You could argue it’s value you goes down as it only involves winning on 2 of the 3 surfaces.
3. For me personally a Davis Cup would come right after slams and a OG in what I would want to win but at the end of the day you are only as good as your teammates in Davis Cup and I can’t put very high on the list for that reason.

 

[Autodidactic player]

... 1. IUWTMA (I use way too many acronyms) ...

You should join the Navy, you'd be right at home: List of U.S. Navy Acronyms

 

[Deleted member 756486]

1. Wimbledon
2. US Open
3. French Open
4. Australian Open
5. WTF
6. YE#1
7. Olympic gold medal
8. Winning all M1000s
9. Davis Cup
10. Hall of fame

 

[weakera]

Slams
YE1
M1000
Olympic Gold
WTF

 

[Tshooter]

Is this question part of a study related to someone’s thesis concerning whether people will change their answers when asked the same question repeatedly over a period of time by different people ?

 

[Terenigma]

Mine is based on a single year on the tour and not several years.

Wimbledon
Australian Open
Us Open
Year end #1
French open
#1 ranking (At any point during the year)
Winning 2+ Masters events
WTF
Olympic gold
Winning 1 masters event

 

[TMF]

1. Wimbledon
2. US Open
= French Open
= Australian Open
5. WTF
6. Ranking(weeks #1 & YE #1)
7. Master 1000
8. ATP 500
9. ATP 250
10. Davis Cup
11. ATP World Tour Awards

 

[King No1e]

Rank these ten accomplishments in order of prestige:

Australian open singles title;
French open singles title;
Wimbledon singles title;
US Open singles title;
Year-end championship singles title;
Being ranked year-end number one in singles;
Winning all Masters 1000/WTA Premier events in singles (over a career);
Winning an Olympic gold metal in singles;
Being a member of the Davis/Fed Cup winning team;
Being inducted into the International Tennis Hall of Fame.

Masters Slam, Hall of Fame, YearEnd #1, AO/RG/W/USO, World Championship Title, Olympic Gold, Winning Davis Cup Team

 

[coolboarder]

Wimbledon will always be #1 over RG, USO, and AO in term of prestige and recognition worldwide. If a casual fan who doesn't watch tennis would know who is Wimbledon champion than a RG or USO Champions. Nadal is the exception so if any future RG champion post-Nadal era would careless who won RG anyways. I still feel the same way about RG, I do not really care about that tournament despite worth 2,000 ATP points.

 

[Towser83]

1. Wimbledon
2. US Open
3. French Open
4. Australian Open
5. WTF
6. YE#1
7. Olympic gold medal
8. Winning all M1000s
9. Davis Cup
10. Hall of fame

This is the exact order I'd pick, except maybe YE#1 and WTF the other way around

Also winning all masters has never been done, so in a way I thought about that above the gold medal, but i still side with your order

 

[Towser83]

Masters Slam, Hall of Fame, YearEnd #1, AO/RG/W/USO, World Championship Title, Olympic Gold, Winning Davis Cup Team

You'd put the masters slam as number 1? I think I can guess why haha

but seriously, that the hall of fame?!! and YEN1 over any of the slams?