D
Deleted member 743561
Guest
I feel like their suffering at this tournament is very comparable. So, not debating that further. Respectfully.By that point it was already extremely clear Federer was the underdog to Nadal on clay. Now I can see the Rome match giving some hope, and going up 6-1, 2-0 increasing that hope, but again once Nadal got back on serve in the 2nd set in that RG final he took complete control. There was never a point Federer got even close to winning, nor was he ever expected to win before the match either. It is obvious we aren't going to agree on this at all.
Djokovic has both had far higher/more realistic expectations to either beat Nadal at the French, or win the title/final (eg- last year), and has come much closer (particularly in 2013) to doing so. Add to that he still hasn't won RG. He has had far more obvious and significant dissapointments at RG than Federer.
Djokovic lost the 2015 final as the heavy favorite, lost after being up a break late in the 5th set with that questionable netchord point in the defacto final in 2013 vs Nadal in the semis, and was beaten in a huge upset by Federer in the semis when nearly everyone still believes he would have been the slight favorite over Nadal in the final in 2011. Federer' by contrast lost 4 fairly standard 4 setters as the clear underdog to Nadal in 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2011 (2005 maybe less clear at the actual time, but atleast in hindsight more clear). No comparision that I see.
One of your last points here, though... regarding the 2011 Final (after Fed had miraculously stopped the Djok-train, in the SFs)... that, in itself, was pretty crushing. Ran out of gas at the end there... but he was hanging very close in that match. Would have been a royal crowning achievement, with the double slam, and doing it after having beaten the unbeatable. It's up there. Different kind of disappointment. Fed was a very distant #3 seed going into that tournament.
Last edited by a moderator: