I played with the DR 98 for years and even this racket would aggravate my TE at times.Seems like most people find this racket very comfortable, although these comments of discomfort do concern me.
DR98 has more comford for sure and more control oriented that means you can string 2-3pounds lower than TT310 and be even more comfortable, 55 Hyper is a killer man!I played with the DR 98 for years and even this racket would aggravate my TE at times.
Absolutely no sign of TE with the TT310 or TT100P - that's with HyperG full poly up to 55 lbs (which is too stiff, but no TE)
I played with the DR 98 for years and even this racket would aggravate my TE at times.
Absolutely no sign of TE with the TT310 or TT100P - that's with HyperG full poly up to 55 lbs (which is too stiff, but no TE)
Just for clarity, I'm back around 47 lbs with HyperG now...55 was way too high for me. My point was that I don't get TE with this racket for whatever reason.Very confused with string setup on my TT310 still... I'm on my first set of strings, with YPTS 1.20mm / synthgut hybrid, strung at 42/45lbs. Getting WAY less power than my Ultra Tour with a full bed of Hyper-G 1.15mm at 43lbs.
Has anyone tried weighting the TTs to 350-360 grams, but keeping the HL balance as is?In an other threat, there was a discussion on flexibility and comfort, and it was mentioned by many that comfort is not only a factor of flexbility, but more of weight, SW, TW and string and tension. I also play with much more stiff rackets than the above mentioned (with mid 50s RAs), which I dont find very stable, but if not strung right they feel more uncomfortable than more stuff rackets.. I play with low-mid 60s rsckets with a history or TE and sensitive arm, and have no issues with heavier weight 330-340gr SW (325-335) and NG/multi strings at mid tensions (at.leat in mains) or slightly higher, including TT100p. Not harsh at all and also plenty of power.
is it more powerful and less control as TW have suggested?Worse in what way?
I have both versions and prefer the O3 due to the slightly tighter string pattern (especially in the throat) and comfort. The differences aren't huge though, both great frames.
it's as dry as a desert out there!Is there any detailed review of the O3 version available on the net?
I am really interested to know if there are any significant differences between O3 and the classic TT310 (regarding groundrstokes, serves, volleys),
I wish I had more info about the pros and cons of each version (in terms of spin, control, stability, plow through, etc). Making a detailed comparison between them will be very helpful, before I decide to buy a pair of one of these two versions.
I am really surprised you did not get enough power with this combo...i couldn't really play with this combo b/c of too much power, not enough control...- Signum Pro X-Perience 1,24mm @21kg
One issue is that the O3 version isn't available in the US so naturally there'll be less people using/talking about it.
I can tell you the differences highlighted above are minimal, but:
Spin - pretty even. Solid beam is a little more open, but the ports add a touch so overall it balances out
Control -no tangible difference here in my experience
Stability and plow - again, no real difference. Twistweight is about the same for both. Plow is generally a by-product of SW so assuming both versions are on spec there won't be much difference there either
The (slightly) more noticeable differences for me are:
String pattern - tighter on the O3 version (extra cross and 8 vs 6 in the throat), which is really just a personal preference having moved from 18x20 frames. A little less string movement and in theory strings should last a bit longer
Comfort - IMO ports do work here to add a little extra comfort, although the solid beam version is still good
Aesthetics - although the beam widths aren't very different, I notice it. Again, I'm used to thinner framed players racquets so this is just a personal preference, doesn't affect playability
Feel - as you'd expect this is the biggest difference. If you've ever used Prince ported frames you'll know what I mean. O3 is obviously a lot more muted. Takes some getting used to at first. I like the feel it offers, some people will probably hate it
Groundstrokes | 89 |
---|---|
Volleys | 85 |
Serves | 84 |
Returns | 86 |
Power | 85 |
Control | 85 |
Maneuverability | 86 |
Stability | 85 |
Comfort | 87 |
Touch/Feel | 86 |
Topspin | 87 |
Slice | 85 |
55 sounds goodI just received my TT100 310 yesterday. I'm planning to string it up with a full bed of Velocity to start with. Maybe 56/55 lbs.?
ohh yeahhh.. get ready.. for some tt100 310 action!I just received my TT100 310 yesterday. I'm planning to string it up with a full bed of Velocity to start with. Maybe 56/55 lbs.?
ohh yeahhh.. get ready.. for some tt100 310 action!
and yes... 55lbs sounds good.. i wouldn't really go north of that... (that's me).
according to who?I thought one wasn't supposed to go over 50 lbs. tension with this racquet.
Recommended tension range is 48-58 pounds. Velocity is a multi so 55 is a good starting point.I thought one wasn't supposed to go over 50 lbs. tension with this racquet.
Is your TT290 customized? What have you done to it?I played my best game today and beat the highest ranked player I ever played, with the X-perience. Finally, maybe 21kg is the right tension. I missed almost nothing except for volleys, which I have to practice a lot this season.
So the TT290 with X-perience 1,24mm will be my setup for this year.
I got myself a pair of TT100 310 very recently, and have hit for about 3 hours with them. The TT310s are ~330 gms, 7 pts HL with overgrip and dampener. I measured SW with the TW Tool - roughly 330+ SW (I have no idea if I got it right).
What do you seek in the Prince that your Instinct doesn't have? If you find the TT310 heavy, you could try the 290gr version.
Given that the static weight and balance of yours are more or less on spec, I'd be very surprised if the SW was that high. Unstrung spec is 285 so should be closer to 315-320. When I measured mine using the same method it came out right around 318, so I've added some lead to 10/2 to bump it up a bit.
Question for those who have been extensively playing with the Tour 100 310. To what extent is it prone to string breaking? I have no experience with 16x18 pattern but a couple of years ago I was a Prince precision 730 user (97 head size 14x18) and I was breaking strings all the time. At one point I was kinda fed up because I would somtimes break two strings in 3 or 4 hours (was not using poly at that time). What can I expect from a 16x18 100 sqin like the T100 310? How is it different from 16x19 100 sqin? I'm hesitating between Tour 100 310 and Tour100p. I have never been fan of 18x20 patterns but many people claim that the 100p plays like a 16x19. I was thinking that strung at low tension maybe with a hybrid it may play not too boardy and provide a good access to spin.
Any advice?
Unfortunately I have no possibility to demo these racquets where I live in Canada.
FYI I am currently hitting a Beast 100 ; I think it is a great racquet but maybe on the rocket launcher side.
I'm not liking the 100 sqinch head size and thick beam. Just different from what max is used to; hence, a PP 93 P is on order. Might sell the 310 to clear the decks. I need less power.
This probably should've been made without the "twaron" / kevlar and put it about 58 RA. . . I mean, it's a LARGE head size.
Higher power?
Phantom is one of the weakest rackets on the market.
I'm not liking the 100 sqinch head size and thick beam. Just different from what max is used to; hence, a PP 93 P is on order. Might sell the 310 to clear the decks. I need less power.
This probably should've been made without the "twaron" / kevlar and put it about 58 RA. . . I mean, it's a LARGE head size.
The head gravity line checks the boxes you want.Well yeah, thinner beam, less power and a lower RA with no Twaron = Phantom
The head gravity line checks the boxes you want.