BreakPoint
Bionic Poster
Maybe yours is the one that's a fake? Just asking.Funny, because mine does not say Midplus on the frame at all.
Maybe yours is the one that's a fake? Just asking.Funny, because mine does not say Midplus on the frame at all.
Wilson was trying to copy the Prestige, but obviously the ROK was not close enough to the Prestige and that's why it died. I agree that the ROK is much better than the Prestige. At least, I prefer it much more over the Prestige.i have two, both say midplus.
and for those that say the ROK is just a prestige copy, i bet most of them have never hit with it. imo, the ROK is better than the prestige. i prefer its balance and flexibility over any of the prestige models i own/tried. i dont know why this racquet gets no love. i got two for $25 a piece, and they r two of the best racquets ive ever hit with. i guess one man's trash is another man's treasure.
Are you trying to be funny? Did you even understand what I was trying to say?
Could your "midplus" ROK POSSIBLY be 100+ square inches, or a non-us model? If it were the 92-93 sq. in. head, then is the shape of the racket-head square shaped like a yonex, or is it round like a wilson? I just doubt that Wilson would print "Midplus" on the ROK 92/93. That is all I am saying.
Looks to me like AlpineCadet has been owned!!
Bought it from DireDesire.Maybe yours is the one that's a fake? Just asking.
Because you kept harping that if it says "Midplus" on it that it must be a fake.How did I get owned? Anyway, you got owned a few replies back.
But how does that prove that it's not a fake?Bought it from DireDesire.
I just doubt that Wilson would print "Midplus" on the ROK 92/93. That is all I am saying.
Maybe he has a fake, or it just might be a non-US version.
If your racket says "Midplus" on it, then it probably can't be a true ProStaff ROK with a 92-93 Sq. Inch head.
But it wasn't just SF. Several people ALL said that their ROK's say "Midplus" on them. I think you have the only one that doesn't. So I'd say the odds are that your's is the fake and not theirs, right?Who knows, maybe SF has a fake?
My racket does not say Midplus on it, and I continued to state what I believe. If you want to call it harping and say I got owned, that's fine. Who knows, maybe SF has a fake?
It can't be. I have the Wilson holographic barcode at the bottom of the outside throat.
Unbelievable! Talk about size inflation. Next, they're going to label the Big Bubba as a "Mid". :roll:
Are you trying to be funny? Did you even understand what I was trying to say?
Could your "midplus" ROK POSSIBLY be 100+ square inches, or a non-us model? If it were the 92-93 sq. in. head, then is the shape of the racket-head square shaped like a yonex, or is it round like a wilson? I just doubt that Wilson would print "Midplus" on the ROK 92/93. That is all I am saying.
Funny, because mine does not say Midplus on the frame at all.
Maybe yours is the one that's a fake? Just asking.
My old ROK had "Midplus" on it as well.
The guy I ultimately sold it to said that there were two batches of the ROK that had subtle differences in the PJ, mayb the one AC has is from a diff batch?
Yeah, I agree... but it's funny that he assumed his was the normal/real one... when actually, his is the exception by not stating midplus on the head.
I don't need to hold my own ROK. I let my girlfriend hold it instead. :wink: LOLMy ROK is way more superior than your ROK. You know why? Because I'm holding it.
That's old news. http://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/showpost.php?p=1984108&postcount=13I'm holding out paper. So I'm beating your ROK.
Where exactly did you say that "it's 600 sq. cm and 93 sq. in. in the throat?" Exactly, you didn't, Einstein. :roll:Re-read the post Einstein. I said it states midplus on the inside of the head and also states it's 600 sq. cm and 93 sq. in. in the throat.
Lol! Is that YOUR new rule?
The older Midplus POG is 93 sq. in. They may label it mid, these days, though. The ROK states 93 sq. in. and 600 sq. cm. and the weight and balance match spec. It's real, trust me. Next, they'll be labeling 95 sq. in. racquets Mid.
Wilson was trying to copy the Prestige, but obviously the ROK was not close enough to the Prestige and that's why it died. I agree that the ROK is much better than the Prestige. At least, I prefer it much more over the Prestige.
BTW, where did you find the ROK for only $25?
Where exactly did you say that "it's 600 sq. cm and 93 sq. in. in the throat?" Exactly, you didn't, Einstein. :roll:
Lol! Is that YOUR new rule?
The older Midplus POG is 93 sq. in. They may label it mid, these days, though. The ROK states 93 sq. in. and 600 sq. cm. and the weight and balance match spec. It's real, trust me.
Next, they'll be labeling 95 sq. in. racquets Mid.
I just passed on two mid Hyper pro staff rok at a used sporting goods store. They were NEW and never strung. They had a few shop marks on the frame. The price........$14/each unstrung of course.
Should I go back and buy them? No racquet bags.
Woooo, a ROK thread/club! For a while I didn't know anyone gave a rat's az$ about these anymore...
Just returned to playing again after a 12 year hiatus. Picked this up at one of the only 3 tennis shops I can find in Taipei (sad, I know) a month ago. Closest one I could find that plays like the softer sticks I used back then. Didn't really know how to string it, so I've got 16ga RIP Control at 55 on it right now. I'll probably go with a 17 or 18 multi next time around at the same tension.
Love how the control and comfort so far, but still trying to get back into form, so I'm shanking my fair share of balls Eh, my fault, not the racquets.
Hey man, where are you in Taipei? I actually picked up my ROK at the pro shop near the Taiwan University Hospital (the 228 park)
umm ..............more like $100 if they ard brand newHELL YES!!! Heck, you can turn around and sell em to me for 30 bucks apiece.