Rank these men's #1 Ranking Achievements in order of most impressive to you?

[McEnroeisanartist]

Rank these men's #1 Ranking Achievements in order of most impressive to you?

1. Sampras - 6 consecutive year end's #1
2. Federer - 237 consecutive weeks ranked #1
3. Federer - 310 total weeks ranked #1
4. Nadal - 11 years between 1st year end #1 and last year end #1
5. Federer - 14 years between first being ranked #1 and last being ranked #1

 

[PerilousPear]

3. Federer - 302 total weeks ranked #1

OP found the perfect solution to corona.

Just build a time machine and go back into time where Fed was winning slams.

 

[Federev]

Rank these men's #1 Ranking Achievements in order of most impressive to you?

1. Sampras - 6 consecutive year end's #1
2. Federer - 237 consecutive weeks ranked #1
3. Federer - 302 total weeks ranked #1
4. Nadal - 11 years between 1st year end #1 and last year end #1
5. Federer - 14 years between first being ranked #1 and last being ranked #1

I think #2 is #1 one to me.

2
1
3
5
4

 

[Third Serve]

2
1
3
4/5

 

[tennis tom]

PETE'S my baby--the CONDOR! and an x-cellent human be-in. Rfed's close, Rafa's not bad too, would like him better if he'd learn to hit OHBH someday.

 

[Towny]

Rank these men's #1 Ranking Achievements in order of most impressive to you?

1. Sampras - 6 consecutive year end's #1
2. Federer - 237 consecutive weeks ranked #1
3. Federer - 302 total weeks ranked #1
4. Nadal - 11 years between 1st year end #1 and last year end #1
5. Federer - 14 years between first being ranked #1 and last being ranked #1

Federer is now on 310 weeks at number 1 in total

 

[Phoenix1983]

2, 1, 3, 5, 4

 

[ibbi]

5 - because I find longevity more impressive than consistency.
4 - ditto.
2 - because there's a couple of guys close to him in the total weeks stat but nobody even slightly close here.
3 - because I find the idea of year end number 1 removed from any kind of context a pointless stat compared to weeks spent there (see 2016).
1 - see above.