Reasons why this wimbledon is worst at last decades

[Tennis_Hands]

In fairness, I think Clayqueen might be a fan of all moonballers, not just Rafa.

Decimo is not a fan of tennis.

Missing deliberately the final of the biggest tournament there is = don't give a hoot about the sport.

 

[Federer and Del Potro]

Cilic has charisma, guy was absolutely geeked today. Most geeked I've ever seen him. Sunday is going to be great.

 

[Sentinel]

I thinks elimination of NAdal, Djokovic and Murray is defo not good for quality of matches and tennis from fan point of view

Correct.

We just have four boring journeymen for the last four. Totally unwatchable.

They should just call it off.

 

[EdSWright]

Correct.

We just have four boring journeymen for the last four. Totally unwatchable.

They should just call it off.

Fed's thinking he should just quit before the final anyway.

 

[Sentinel]

Fed's thinking he should just quit before the final anyway.

Fed just needs to forfeit.

Reaching slam finals but not winning is becoming horribly embarrassing. This is worse than being an armchair tennis expert or a weekend social mixed doubles continental grip dude.

 

[Sentinel]

Decimo is not a fan of tennis.

Missing deliberately the final of the biggest tournament there is = don't give a hoot about the sport.

She'll be here, mark my words, to poast images of YAWNs and ZZZs etc and tell us how boring it is, and how quiet the crowd is.

Not to mention spending the next month complaining about the flagrant human rights violations in putting Federer on CC every match, and that too the second match.
And demanding to know why Fed fans were not screaming for Cilic to be given a time violation in the semifinal while they complain so much about her dear boy.
And how it's not fair that Federer takes the clay season off while the others slog it out.
And how it's not fair that Federer can just serve out breakpoints.

The list of horrors perpetrated by Federer just goes on and on while his five or six delusional fans keep on cheering and supporting these heinous crimes against humanity that he casually and suavely commits.

 

[vladisimo]

couldn t disagree more...especialy when somebody puts murray and entertainment in the same sentence.

 

[vladisimo]

I could say that all tennis fans are only fans of their favourite player. Why is it different for Nadal?

lol no I watch tennis no matter the player especially in the late GS stages...my faves usualy fizzle away unexpectedly

 

[vladisimo]

I was being facetious.

There's currently two threads on Zverev who is at this point a "one Masters wonder".
There should have been someone, anyone, making some moves by this point. It's the same old guys yet again.

what does making moves mean?Zverev won a masters,thiem went deep in all the clay tournaments ,kyrgios was prety good before getting injured...and nadal and federer still play great,I will never understand what is that hard for people to comprehend about they re level of play ATM.You guys keep bringing that generation of nadal djokovic federer murray etc. that had great results at young ages..well maybe that is because there weren t any actual nadals,federers,djokovics or murrays in they re young days plus the fact they are unique one in 10 milion players.

 

[sportmac]

At this point I think Next Gen will stop the lost boys from winning slams even after the big 4 and the Nadal generation go by the wayside

The sad part about the Lost Boys isn't so much that they couldn't beat the big 4, they couldn't even oust the second and third tier players . The ferrers, Berdych, Tsonga, monfils, type guys

Exactly right. Lost gen has done nothing. Cilic is the only one and he's a questionable lost gen anyway.

Since the game is getting bigger, stronger and older I think the lost gen might manage to win a few slams until the nextgen fills out. Champions through attrition.