sexmachine
Rookie
I think ppl r bein 2 harsh, roger federer is 1 of the more grounded athletes of the sport and i think he works hard enough that he can make a little remark that i think is more humourous...
pound cat said:It didn't help him in 05. I'm watching the semi right now . God, that Safin is good.....
I disagree. I thought he came off as a really nice guy. His playing is fantastic and he's just being honest. What do want, false modesty? In his presentation speech he actually didn't say his playing was great even once. Also Federer doesn't say he 'loves America', he says "I've had an incredible run here in America for almost 1.5yrs, I haven't lost, so there's something special about this place I guess" - man, anyone on the tour would think the same. Sounds like sour grapes from a Blake fan whose hero got his lame arse kicked.Free_Martha said:I couldn't believe Federer's speech at Indian Wells. How many times did he refer to his own playing as brilliant or fantastic? His stick arm could not reach around fast enough to pat himself on the back. James Blake was his contrast in class. You never felt that he was saying anything just to be nice and polite a la Federer.
And Rog sucking up to the Americans pretending to act like he loves it there doesn't win him any free points. Judging from their luke warm reaction I dont think the audience was fooled by his insincerity.
crosscourt said:I thought that he was trying to avoid giving the impression that he enjoys playing Roddick only because he beats him, and that he likes to play him because he thinks Rodick is a fair competitor/good sportsman etc. I think that something got a little lost in the expression.
listen up fool.....stoneagle said:i bet you, roger cannot say i enjoyed playing
with nadal. almost everytime they played
roger is getting pulverized by nadal. he can
only afford to say i enjoy beating such as this,
such as that player only to those underdog to
him.:roll:
Rhino said:listen up fool.....
Federer (about playing Nadal):
“I enjoy the challenge with him,” Federer said. “He’s a terrific scrambler and he brings something else to the game as a great left-hander, and we don’t have many of those. I enjoy playing him.”
I see you've been sucking on lemons again, devila. Yewww!!...devila said:He was booed in Rome and in the post match interview, he whined about the bad crowd booing his childishness, insincerity and fake calmness on court.
He proudly stated that he called opponents "jerks" and "idiot" because they beat him.
In the US Open, he was booed because the crowd saw through his self-congratulatory "graciousness". He thought he was delighting the Americans by saying they should be relieved and giddy that Americans were in the quarterfinals. He didn't even realize he was booed.
In Thailand, he told the reporters that Roddick was tired from playing Davis Cup before and said Roddick didn't have trouble. (Roddick had an elbow injury; he had to sleep in the locker room due to the time change and jet lag. Then, he had medical treatment - smelling salt in his match.)
Federer said he wished the other players would lose really early and that he'd cruise to the final.
He wanted the injured players in Shanghai to somehow step on court to play. They OWE him a favor and deserve "CRITICISM" for not playing.
Federer whined about line call technology because the crowd may interfere with tennis and tennis wouldn't be the player's "sport" anymore.
The hypocrite decided to use the line call challenge to change calls.
He said "I'm neutral."
That's hilarious. Federer won Miami, Indian Wells 2004 and almost won the Masters Cup because of bad calls.
Diplomatic bullcrap.
so ur saying federer is not a good sportsman, or better yet, ur saying hes not a good player, ur an idiot, a big idiot...devila said:He was booed in Rome and in the post match interview, he whined about the bad crowd booing his childishness, insincerity and fake calmness on court.
He proudly stated that he called opponents "jerks" and "idiot" because they beat him.
In the US Open, he was booed because the crowd saw through his self-congratulatory "graciousness". He thought he was delighting the Americans by saying they should be relieved and giddy that Americans were in the quarterfinals. He didn't even realize he was booed.
In Thailand, he told the reporters that Roddick was tired from playing Davis Cup before and said Roddick didn't have trouble. (Roddick had an elbow injury; he had to sleep in the locker room due to the time change and jet lag. Then, he had medical treatment - smelling salt in his match.)
Federer said he wished the other players would lose really early and that he'd cruise to the final.
He wanted the injured players in Shanghai to somehow step on court to play. They OWE him a favor and deserve "CRITICISM" for not playing.
Federer whined about line call technology because the crowd may interfere with tennis and tennis wouldn't be the player's "sport" anymore.
The hypocrite decided to use the line call challenge to change calls.
He said "I'm neutral."
That's hilarious. Federer won Miami, Indian Wells 2004 and almost won the Masters Cup because of bad calls.
Diplomatic bullcrap.
There is some truth in what you say about bad calls and a bit of Fed's judgmental attitude sometimes, but for Wimbledon I think these guys don't give a **** of Federer, they have had so many great champions and they don't need him. That he gets some practice time on centre court (and I'm not even sure of that), as the world number 1 I don't find that incredible, who do you want them to give some time there, Tursunov ? Nadal who sucks on grass ?devila said:We can't forget the extra practice time at Wimbledon Centre Court for Federer, the darling of tennis.
mdhubert said:There is some truth in what you say about bad calls and a bit of Fed's judgmental attitude sometimes, but for Wimbledon I think these guys don't give a **** of Federer, they have had so many great champions and they don't need him. That he gets some practice time on centre court (and I'm not even sure of that), as the world number 1 I don't find that incredible, who do you want them to give some time there, Tursunov ? Nadal who sucks on grass ?
??? - He played 7 matches, all world class except round one. Santoro, Rochus, Kiefer, Nalbandian, Hewitt, Agassi! You call that easy?devila said:He's called a hero for getting an easy 6-match US Open draw..
You call losing the odd set eating lemons? Check out all the matches everyone else loses!! Are you mad? And trying to blame Federer's sucess on line calls is just desperation - he won those 2 sets despite being injured.devila said:Federer fans eat lemons all the time. They ate lemons when Federer lost a set or lost Masters Cup despite having 2 sets gifted to him with awful calls.
Like this means anything! I don't blame any world no1 for getting centre court practice time. Centre court at Wimbledon is Fed's back yard - he earned it.devila said:How about their conspiracy theories about Americans cheating in the US? We can't forget the extra practice time at Wimbledon Centre Court for Federer, the darling of tennis
What? If he has a good record he can state it. Roddick wishes he had something, anything, to bragg about. This rubbish about line calls, etc, is ridiculously clumsy and absurd. It just sounds like sour grapes, because despite 200 million people to chose from, America still can't get near him. His wins against Blake and Roddick in the next couple of days will be his 25th and 26th consecutive victories against American players.devila said:He enjoyed bragging about head-to-head records against injured opponents. Nadal, Roddick, Agassi, Blake, Ferrero, Ljubicic, Safin, Hewitt, Davydenko, Gaudio and Haas let Federer weasel out of his matches after many key bad calls, 7 wasted set points and inability to hold leads.
devila said:Ignorance is bliss.
Of course, Federer wrote about winning with no problem after an injured opponent stopped working. The day before, he had to save break points that would give Srichaphan a win.
Federer was worried that his horrendously injured leg wouldn't heal in 2004, yet
he had no trouble.
Federer exclaimed, "I'm standing on one leg. I'm happy I won."
The 6-0 6-0 win over Gaudio was painful.
A haplessly injured Federer gets a cheap bad call late in the 1st set tiebreak and
another one at 2-4 in the 2nd tiebreak. David had to dig out of a 2 set hole to win.
arosen said:Stoneagle, are you a teenager or still in elementary? Just curious.
mdhubert said:Just to keep things in perspective:
Q. Is there anything wrong with the guy? Is there anything at all wrong with him?
JAMES BLAKE: Man, he speaks too many languages. He was in here for too long. He was doing it in Swiss German, French, in English. I mean, pick one. Gosh (smiling).
No, I mean, I was hoping maybe I'd be better at him at the challenges, but we were both 0-for-1 tonight. I didn't even beat him in that.
I don't know. There's not many things I can say bad about him. That's another thing. He's like my brother, I think one of his good friends always had the classic line - he's the kind of guy you love to hate, but you just can't because he's too nice. He's one of those guys that everything comes so easy to him, you want to hate him, but then he goes and does something nice and is as classy as can be. He's too darn nice - another reason you can't hate him (smiling).
I don't think a top pro would say that from an arrogant jerk with all the competition involved...
Honestly I'm a Fed fan and I don't like when he goes "my game is awesome" or "I've beaten most of the guys" but 4 things have to be taken into consideration:tlm said:I have listened to his arrogance many times,but there are so many fed lovers here that its okay no matter what he says.I like the way if roddick or someone else acts a little cocky they get ripped up on this site,but roger can be in love with himself all he wants + it is fine.
AMEN TO THAT BROTHERmdhubert said:Honestly I'm a Fed fan and I don't like when he goes "my game is awesome" or "I've beaten most of the guys" but 4 things have to be taken into consideration:
1.culturally, Swiss-Germans are quite frank and direct about their feelings, it's not like Coria with exaggerated sadness and almost tears when he shakes hand of an opponent he's just beaten.
2. He dominates and he plays the game like no other in ALL history except maybe Tilden or Laver
3. Journalist's questions are often stupid and lead to stupid answers like yesterday when a guy asked Fed if the Blake match was a way to groove his strokes
4. he's smart and he always counter-balances with humble comments or attitude, so it's tough to attack him directly.
So it's difficult to compare him to Roddick
This is so true.tlm said:I have listened to his arrogance many times,but there are so many fed lovers here that its okay no matter what he says.I like the way if roddick or someone else acts a little cocky they get ripped up on this site,but roger can be in love with himself all he wants + it is fine.
Free_Martha said:This is so true.
At least there is one man in the media who is not afraid to expose Federer's fatheadedness:
Federer's ridiculous complaint
Posted by Charles Bricker at 07:46 PM
OK, so we now know that Roger Federer is feeling a little hostile toward the electronic line calling system.
"I'm sort of neutral," he began after his second-round win over Arnaud Clement, in which he challenged two calls, getting one replay in his favor. But in fact he sounded anything but neutral.
"At one stage it wasn't working. Obviously, that's something that is not acceptable, you know, for us players, playing with our minds, I think you know."
Then Federer laid into the fans on the stadium court. "My big wish from this whole thing is that the fans sort of don't take this as a game, because it happens so rarely that they shouldn't be screaming, 'Oh, challenge that' or 'Challenge this.' Like when there are close calls, they don't applaud anymore because they think there is going to be a challenge. I feel like that's sometimes a little bit of a problem right now."
Federer's position on electronic line calling is no surprise. He expressed his doubts a year ago, when USTA officials came to the French Open to sound out players on its use at the 2005 U.S. Open.
And that's fine. It's OK to be opposed. But it's difficult to understand what he's talking about when he rails against the fans getting involved in the match. That's exactly what we all want to happen.
As for the glitch in the second set, for parts of one game the computer system wasn't working and chair umpire Fergus Murphy made an announcement to the audience. Let's make two points here. First, this tournament is a shakedown cruise for Hawk-Eye. It's entirely reasonable that there will be burps. Second, the Cyclops system that calls services at the U.S. Open gets shut down several times during the fortnight. Have you ever heard Federer complain that that "plays with the players minds?" No, I haven't either.
Electronic line calling is one of the best things to happen to tennis since, well, since Federer. It's too bad he can't see that.
skip1969 said:i think 16 pages of subjective opinions on whether or not someone (who none of us even know intimately) is or isn't "arrogant" is a bit much. all these theories based on . . . what?
a host of soundbites from interviews and post-match conferences?
second-hand information that we digest from newspaper articles and tennis magazines?
or the vast insight that we can glean from our couches or courtside seats, as we watch a complete stranger chase down litltle yellow tennis balls?
i'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that there are people who see us everyday . . . at work, at school . . . our next door neighbors or the drinking buddies we see on the weekends . . . who only know a FRACTION of who we really are as people. and my guess is that we know even less about mr federer.
Robbie_1988 said:True you have a point and we don't know Mr Federer. But its just that we're bored and we like to comment or state our opinions. There are some people who are bored and have nothing to do... like me.
Robbie_1988 said:True you have a point and we don't know Mr Federer. But its just that we're bored and we like to comment or state our opinions. There are some people who are bored and have nothing to do... like me.
Looks like Roger hasn't learned anything about how to beat Nadal.MONTE CARLO, Monaco (AP) -- Roger Federer thinks the key to beating Rafael Nadal is to be ready for a fight.
"Just stay with him, for the entire time," Federer said. "I have the feeling that other guys tend not to take the physical challenge with him. That's what I won't do."
"He's quite one-dimensional with his game," Federer said. "After Dubai, I thought I actually saw the way I should play against him. The more I play him, the better it is for me."
Reaching the Monte Carlo final has "exceeded" Federer's expectations. The 24-year-old Federer feels he is ahead of schedule for the French Open -- the only major he has yet to win.
"I've got another opportunity to play him," Federer said. "It's going to give me an indication, you know, if I will play him at the French (Open)."
Thank you, Tim. It is nice when intelligent people agree with me.tlm said:It is nice to hear that some people can see reality,very well put tennissavy.
Free_Martha said::lol:
Looks like Roger hasn't learned anything about how to beat Nadal.
Open mouth, insert one dimensional foot.