Nylon will always be popular because not everyone is good enough to use poly. Many rec players wouldn't like the stiff feel of poly after using nylon for over 10 years. On the other hand, for advanced rec players, poly would be like a discovery of life time. It really depends of level of play and most rec players not so advanced, so I think nylon will always be preferred and sell more.
Actually, you've got it backwards. Really good players can do anything they want with the ball using any string -- including nylon.
Actually, you've got it backwards. Really good players can do anything they want with the ball using any string -- including nylon.
Actually, you've got it backwards. Really good players can do anything they want with the ball using any string -- including nylon.
When you use the term "nylon," is that another term for anything synthetic with the exception of poly strings? I remember about 20-25 years ago in the local tennis store seeing two strings on the shelf- Prince Synthetic Gut and Leona 66 (Nylon).
If it turns out to be better than nylon which is what I'm hoping and this is a trending price for Mulit's I could see Nylon having issues competing.
99.5% of multifilament strings on the market are nylon.
I think the OP means nylon as a material rather than a string class.
There heaps of it around still, most seems to come from Asia. Most big brands have one solid core often used to pre-strung their cheaper racquets. A lot of stringers offer it as a cheap job for beginners, only issue I have is there are some syth gut that's not much more and plays a lot nicer, the cost of the stringer makes $2 saving negligible in my experience.Not sure if anyone makes a single nylon monofilament string anymore?
In that case, no it won't go away it's good stuff for most players, more than poly anyway. Some pro's like Courier used it instead of Nat Gut.
There heaps of it around still, most seems to come from Asia. Most big brands have one solid core often used to pre-strung their cheaper racquets. A lot of stringers offer it as a cheap job for beginners, only issue I have is there are some syth gut that's not much more and plays a lot nicer, the cost of the stringer makes $2 saving negligible in my experience.
Several reasons why nylon will always be around:
Only string breakers will benefit from going to polyesters.
If you have arm issues, you should not go poly/kevlar route.
Good natural gut will be even more expensive in the future.
Only string breakers will benefit from going to polyesters.
Oh cool so your saying “its the player not the racquet”?Actually, you've got it backwards. Really good players can do anything they want with the ball using any string -- including nylon.
Oh cool so your saying “its the player not the racquet”?
cool wow interesting contribution thatis the first time ive ever heard that in my life
Is this a troll thread? the link took me to some Chinese casino webpage.
Anyway, nylon has a huge place in tennis as natural gut may get increasingly pricey over time and polyester just isn't a suitable string for a lot of players. When they create a polyester that doesn't bang all it's resilience out in a few hours, then it might be time for nylon to go away. Until then, nylon offers elasticity and resilience for people with arm issues and is a necessity on the market.
There is a reason the most popular string world wide is Prince Synthetic Gut with Duraflex.