Should Yonex invest in a Blade-like line?

[Chairman3]

U will lose little plow because u will have less mass in the handle and this help at stability and plow. It will be not more maneuvrable it will much more maneuvrable because u lose some 1 hl but gains much less static weight wich counts much more.
What u are saying is that if its still same head light proportion it dont matter how much static weight is added or lessen which is absurd and ilogical.

Here you go @agradina
Almost everyone would agree when referring to "plow" you are characterizing the swingweight of a racquet

 

[agradina]

Its pretty clear fo everyone that i said only that mass in the handle helps at stability and plow , without even mentioning swingweight , because
any mass on the handle has a very low impact on the swingweight because the distance in the equation is squared. Having more mass on the opposite side of the rotational axis has an impact on the recoil weight but not on the swingweight, but more on that in the recoilweight section which helps at the stability and plow even if it dont affect the swingweight too much.
So for ur information handle mass contribute to swingweight even if not so much , and ur afirmation that "Handle mass doesn't contribute to swingweight" is completly false.

 

[optic yellow]

Handle mass doesn't contribute to swingweight because of how swingweight is calculated. Handle mass doesn't add stability, ask anyone.
A tfight 305g has basically the same swingweight as a 340g RF97, and yes they feel pretty similar to swing despite a 35g difference.
Read about swingweight and maybe you'll understand why you're wrong.

Is tennis SW calculated differently than golf SW?

 

[Chairman3]

Is tennis SW calculated differently than golf SW?

I have nary an idea how golf swingweight is calculated.