Thanks! I've been looking the specs of pacific and seem very well.
I have read that the sweetspot is reduced. What do you think?
How do you have it customized?
I've got it customized quite heavily, because I've been playing with the same specs for quite a while now, and am used to a lot more swingweight.
Mine have a leather grip on them, 2 gram of lead at 3&9 and 5 gram at 12.
That brings it to around 330g weight, 303 sw and a 31,2 balance.
I've heard talk of the smaller sweetspot aswell, but can't really say that I agree. The same things have been said about the Pacifix X force pro no.1 which I've also played. Both have a normal sized sweetspot for me, BUT the sweetspot is quite pronounced - so if you happen to miss it, you will feel it. Somewhat similar to the older prestiges in that matter.
All of my Pacific racquets have had quite a bit of lead added in the hoop however, so maybe that is why I never had issues with a smaller sweetspot.
As to what time_fly said:
When I was with Dunlop, I used both the CX Tour and the regular CX 200 for some time, and I really liked both. Performance wise the regular 200 is awesome and fits perfectly as a lighter and more maneuverable version of the CX Tour with some added power. The feel was nothing like the 95 in² version for me though, which is why I chose the CX Tour. But you should test it, it's an awesome racquet. Probably the better of the 2 dunlops for most people.
