The Arrogance of Alcaraz is and will be his undoing

RS

Bionic Poster
He's absolutely on a different tier. In the tournaments you cited as Medvedev's greatest failures he still comprehensively beat Tsitsipas in those events if that doesn't say it all I don't know what would.
Med USO 21 or Tpas RG 21 who you taking by level?
 
Last edited:
Alcaraz was just the new kid on the block and the hype from the media made him arrogant enough to believe he's on the same level as Djokovic. Now that Zverev humbled him and exposed how overrated he is, it will only get worse from here. As more tennis players figure out Alcaraz's style of tennis, he will struggle to win big tournaments let alone slams. He will become Ruud 2.0 winning the occasional 250 but nothing more.
 

mahatma

Hall of Fame
Alcaraz was just the new kid on the block and the hype from the media made him arrogant enough to believe he's on the same level as Djokovic. Now that Zverev humbled him and exposed how overrated he is, it will only get worse from here. As more tennis players figure out Alcaraz's style of tennis, he will struggle to win big tournaments let alone slams. He will become Ruud 2.0 winning the occasional 250 but nothing more.
That’s way too much underestimation. He is 20 and has good 15 years of tennis left. I still see 10+ slams
 

gqnelly

Rookie
The difference with Stan is his backhand down the line. Everyone has a crosscourt rally ball but you cant hurt your opponent if you cant hit a powerful shot down the line from that wing. The tendency in a crosscourt exchange is to anticipate another crosscourt ball, so you can wrong foot your opponent. It is also the shortest geometry for you to hit through the court (but the highest net clearance) which means they don't have a lot of time to get to the other corner. Even if they get there...their response will be neutral at best. It was harder to read Stan's tendencies....Carlos is a bit more predictable.
 

DSH

Talk Tennis Guru
Funny how many idiots come out of the woodwork as soon as a player has a bad day at the office.

Carlos is only 20 and already has 2 slams and been world #1. Fed was 22 before he won his first slam.

He will learn from this and bounce back.
Federer was 21 years, 10 months and 27 days old when he won Wimbledon 2003.
:D
 

The Blond Blur

G.O.A.T.
out-of-line-anthony-mackie.gif

As much as I hate to say it the OP has a point. Time and time again Tiny Carl has said he wants to play Joker in the F. It’s starting to come off like he’s looking past the guys he’s playing in front of him. There’s nothing wrong with wanting to play in the F but the thing is you have actually make the F first. This is back to back schlem losses where he was beaten pretty comprehensively. Now the Mad Lad and Zedrot both played well to beat him, but Carl didn’t help himself with how erratic he played.
 

FeroBango

Hall of Fame
It doesn't mean he should be absolved on any criticism though. Him thinking about Novak ahead of time is a flaw of his that needs to be corrected as he hasn't yet dominated the rest of the field to be that arrogant.
I concur but I'm fairly sure Pheasant is talking about some of our particularly vicious trolls with absolutely no real perspective (some of whom you can find on this very page).
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
He's absolutely on a different tier. In the tournaments you cited as Medvedev's greatest failures he still comprehensively beat Tsitsipas in those events if that doesn't say it all I don't know what would.
Just because he beat Tsitsipas doesn't put him in a whole other tier. I'm not talking about how they match-up here.

Again, if he was, AO 2021 and AO 2022 would not have happened.
 
Last edited:

The Guru

Legend
Just because he beat Tsitsipas doesn't put him in a whole other tier.

Again, if he was, AO 2021 and AO 2022 would not have happened.
If he wasn't AO 2021 and 2022 would not have happened because he would've lost one to Tsitsipas. Also every low level HOF one slam wonder type player has performances as bad or worse than those. Those two just particularly annoy you because of who they came against. Med's now reached his 8th semi (prolly his 6th final too) and is on track to be the first to reach 10 since Murray (Wawrinka only got to 9). He's won 6 masters the WTF and a slam (and two wins over world number 1 at slams) and he didn't fold a masters final to Coric. Medvedev's been a serious threat since he broke out outside of most of 2022 Tsitsipas was only really relevant as a top player in the front half of 2021. Tsitsipas has not earned being taken as seriously as Daniil.
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
If he wasn't AO 2021 and 2022 would not have happened because he would've lost one to Tsitsipas. Also every low level HOF one slam wonder type player has performances as bad or worse than those. Those two just particularly annoy you because of who they came against. Med's now reached his 8th semi (prolly his 6th final too) and is on track to be the first to reach 10 since Murray (Wawrinka only got to 9). He's won 6 masters the WTF and a slam (and two wins over world number 1 at slams) and he didn't fold a masters final to Coric. Medvedev's been a serious threat since he broke out outside of most of 2022 Tsitsipas was only really relevant as a top player in the front half of 2021. Tsitsipas has not earned being taken as seriously as Daniil.
Again, I am not talking about how they match-up. Sure, Med is better than Zed and Tsits, both of whom are downright mediocre, thus making Med stand out.

I am talking about overall performances. Can Med choke like those guys? Yes. Can he get wrecked in slam matches like those guys can? Also yes. Who they came against is irrelevant since Tsitsipas went through the same thing against the same players.

Med being a serious threat is pushing it.
 

The Guru

Legend
Again, I am not talking about how they match-up. Sure, Med is better than Zed and Tsits, both of whom are downright mediocre, thus making Med stand out.

I am talking about overall performances. Can Med choke like those guys? Yes. Can he get wrecked in slam matches like those guys can? Also yes. Who they came against is irrelevant since Tsitsipas went through the same thing against the same players.

Med being a serious threat is pushing it.
Djokovic can choke. Djokovic can get wrecked in slam matches. By that criteria he fits with those guys. Any non arbitrary or ridiculous criteria shows Medvedev having clearly shown himself to be on a different tier than Tsitsipas. If you wanna argue peak Stef as comparable to peak Med fine but Peak Stef was like 5 months whereas Med's been doing it for like 5 years now. Zverev's in between I'm not upset if you wanna say he's on Med's level I think saying that's probably fair.
 

MichaelNadal

Bionic Poster
Agreed. Tone down the showboating, be more humble and stop talking about facing Novak in the final when you’re not yet through the first week. Have some respect for your opponents.
All that racquet-shaking and sarcastic nodding and skipping around when he won the 3rd. Then he goes 05 Federer and starts trying to be all flashy instead of buckling in and taking it to Zverev on the level that mattered. He got exactly what he deserved today and he will feel silly af watching the match back for how cocky and assured he got when he won the 3rd.
 

mike danny

Bionic Poster
Djokovic can choke. Djokovic can get wrecked in slam matches. By that criteria he fits with those guys.
When they win as much as Djokovic, they can get a pass.
Any non arbitrary or ridiculous criteria shows Medvedev having clearly shown himself to be on a different tier than Tsitsipas. If you wanna argue peak Stef as comparable to peak Med fine but Peak Stef was like 5 months whereas Med's been doing it for like 5 years now. Zverev's in between I'm not upset if you wanna say he's on Med's level I think saying that's probably fair.
Again, he is better than Zed and Tsits. But he's still closer to their tier than some higher tier considering that he messes up just as badly as they do. He's still not a guy top player fear.
 

gqnelly

Rookie
I agree that Carlos does come across as very arrogant off and on the court. He goes for the knockout punch on every shot....when he should be peppering the jab and looking to land combinations. This sets up the knockout....
 

SpinWizard

Rookie
This is a guy who went toe to toe in baseline rallies with Novak at both Wimbledon and at Cincy. Anyone who can do that doesn’t really have any glaring stroke weakness despite what ttw warriors want to say.

The issue for Carlos is always going to be the same. He doesn’t win many easy points. He doesn’t have a serve that can do that or one stroke that has put away power. Contrast that to Sinner who has easy power or Z today whose serve was humming.

I am not saying he is not more talented than Z or Sinnwr but always having to play hard and never get easy points is mentally draining. That’s why he goes for a lot of drop shots. One might think it is arrogance or him treating his opponent like a club player, but IMO he is doing it because he wants some easier and quicker points and is willing to take the risk that he loses those points. He knows the alternative of going though long rallies each time is not sustainable for him.
That's actually really interesting point. Thiem was more or less the same example. He did not win easy points or matches. He always had to be at the peak of his powers, play every point at 120% and sometimes it was so draining physically and mentally that he could not finish the tournament and win it. That's why he lost so many finals (ATP Finals for example).

On the other hand i do believe that Carlos has much more variety and "easy" power than Thiem. He needs to play like he did against Novak during Wimbledon 2023. I don't know why he switched again to his "usual" playstyle and tries to play highlight reel points and finish the rallies as fast as possible. During Wimbledon he developed safer baseline play, with less power but more precision and it worked absolutely brilliant against Novak.
 

sortof

Semi-Pro
He got exactly what he deserved today and he will feel silly af watching the match back for how cocky and assured he got when he won the 3rd.
Not so sure about this. This attitude really seems to be part of him as person, it´s probably a narcisstic personality disorder. - he can play wonderful tennis in an all jubilant adrenaline rush sucking in the applause. But when asked to do some dry and hard work he fails.
 

socallefty

G.O.A.T.
It seems like Carlos is a showman who wants to entertain the crowd and dominate his opponent in addition to winning. I think when he is the favorite, it seems to exacerbate these tendencies. At Wimbledon Djokovic was favored and Carlos played much more in control.

When he is not playing well or when the opponent is redlining, he needs to learn to tone the offense down and grind to make it a longer match. Instead he often starts going for even more and sprays errors which makes the opponent more confident. I think he needs JCF in the stands to tell him at what level of aggression to play during a match. On his own, he doesn’t seem to be able to figure it out.

He also hasn‘t done well in terms of winning big titles on fast, low-bouncing courts like at the AO and in the Fall indoor season. Maybe it is also a weakness in his game as you have to be patient on these courts where it is harder to break opponents.
 

FeroBango

Hall of Fame
That's actually really interesting point. Thiem was more or less the same example. He did not win easy points or matches. He always had to be at the peak of his powers, play every point at 120% and sometimes it was so draining physically and mentally that he could not finish the tournament and win it. That's why he lost so many finals (ATP Finals for example).

On the other hand i do believe that Carlos has much more variety and "easy" power than Thiem. He needs to play like he did against Novak during Wimbledon 2023. I don't know why he switched again to his "usual" playstyle and tries to play highlight reel points and finish the rallies as fast as possible. During Wimbledon he developed safer baseline play, with less power but more precision and it worked absolutely brilliant against Novak.
He did that just the last match. That confidence got a little too into his head against Zverev I suppose.

I even comented a couple of days about how he played the percentages.

He should embrace it more indeed.
 

tex123

Hall of Fame
Oh. My. God! CALM DOWN PEOPLE. He's human and young. Zverev played out this world and he had a bad match. It happens :sneaky:. When he's winning everyone is on his jock and saying he's the next GOAT. When he loses everyone is like he's done..."He should retire"..."He's only gonna be a two slam winner" :-D. This is coming from someone who is not a big fan of Alcaraz. Respect him, but not a fan.
The 'once in a generation' player is on a 9 tournament losing streak since W.

It's about time you realised his game does not work on hard.
 

gqnelly

Rookie
Every sport has an athlete that illicits the "oohs" and "ahhhs" . Those players don't typically have Hall of Fame resumes or establish benchmarks for sustained excellence. A home run hitter with a .230 batting average is going to get exposed over the long haul.
 

clayqueen

Talk Tennis Guru
Alcaraz is overhyped for that reason, I don't support him, but I wouldn't criticise him for saying he'll have the upper hand because Zverev had spent a lot of time on the court. Players should be allowed some genuine fighting talk without being called arrogant.
 

Phenomenal

Professional
out-of-line-anthony-mackie.gif

As much as I hate to say it the OP has a point. Time and time again Tiny Carl has said he wants to play Joker in the F. It’s starting to come off like he’s looking past the guys he’s playing in front of him. There’s nothing wrong with wanting to play in the F but the thing is you have actually make the F first. This is back to back schlem losses where he was beaten pretty comprehensively. Now the Mad Lad and Zedrot both played well to beat him, but Carl didn’t help himself with how erratic he played.
IMO The thing people don't understand is people who criticise him like OP knows that he is capable of beating the likes of Zverev and Medvedev. He lost these matches due to lack of few things. Of course he is young and very impressive and will improve.
But still now i think he could have won these 2 slam matches that he lost had he better prepared and stayed mentally better.
 

Sputnik Bulgorov

Professional
What's also disrespectful, in my view, is imagining the Zverev-Medvedev-Tsitsipas generation would have nothing more to offer, and that Alcaraz would simply waltz in and become the next big thing without any challenges. And I think a lot of this backlash against him comes from people who, in their minds, were already seeing him as the new king of tennis (there's a huge demand for that, and I can't understand why, we've literally just had three kings of tennis in close succession) and who react with unhealthy and childish levels of impatience if he fails to dominate the tour immediately, at only 20 years of age, when the sport is increasingly becoming an older man's game.

To be fair, Alcaraz kind of did just waltz in and become the next big thing from right under the Tsitsipas-Medvedev-Zverev generation. He's ranked higher and accomplished more than all of them combined before his 21st birthday. Many believe the Alcaraz-Sinner-Rune gen might prevent the Tsitsipas-Medvedev-Zverev gen from ever getting the spotlight. Let's see if either Medvedev or Zverev can win this one for their gen.
 

nolefam_2024

Talk Tennis Guru
Last time I checked Alcaraz was 20 years old. What were you guys expecting, 20 year olds winning golden slams or something?

To lose in a slam quarterfinal against Zverev as a 20 year old is not the end of the world. He will be good.
He is not stopping Nole. Nole is already 36.5

The father time will stop nole. You know THIS is the time to make a name by stopping Nole. But Raz isn't making it to him. And maybe even in 1 year when Nole is more weaker a bunch of players can beat him.

AO is a very big blow to Raz right now. Year started badly.
 

BauerAlmeida

Hall of Fame
Lol.

When it's the other way around the complaint is usually that they lack belief and have a defeatist mindset, are happy just to face the Big 3, etc.
 

esvc

Semi-Pro
I don't like his arrogance and his loud long grunting, but at least he doesn't cheat blatantly like Rune who took MTO in the middle of a game when Botic was serving for their match.
 

heftylefty

Hall of Fame
How long will you beat that drum? Till he turns 30 or what?
Do you think Alcaraz is a bust? He been on tour for 4 years, with 12 career titles including two Slams and reached a ranking No.1 I don't need to beat a drum; the kid has proven he's not a journeyman scratching out a career.
 

Enceladus

Legend
He would have become n.1 after winning USO, if not for the frozen ranking due to covid. He is completely different material than these two, it’s funny to discuss.
I think you are mistaken. The frozen ranking was the subject of the 2020 season, but Medvedev won the US Open a year later.
 

messiahrobins

Hall of Fame
Spot on. Absolutely agree. I also don't like his mentality in matches i find him bit shaky sometimes. Doesn't look fully focused either. He has insane talent and has all the shots but when he plays badly maybe he can be confused whether to continue playing agressive. He likes to play offensive tennis but i think he should play for bit more margins, needs to find the balance. when he can't hit through against the likes of Zverev and Medvedev. There is no way they can hit through against Alcaraz.

Idk how is it now but last year i saw that his coaching team, Ferrero talks him like everypoint. To me it doesn't like good at all, it harms him more. Thats why don't like his coaching at all.
Its the smiling during matches and the hollywood shots he tries at the wrong time which bother me as it is a sign of a lack of focus and like i say arrogance really in the sense it shows he doesnt feel threatened by the opponent.
 

ScentOfDefeat

G.O.A.T.
To be fair, Alcaraz kind of did just waltz in and become the next big thing from right under the Tsitsipas-Medvedev-Zverev generation. He's ranked higher and accomplished more than all of them combined before his 21st birthday. Many believe the Alcaraz-Sinner-Rune gen might prevent the Tsitsipas-Medvedev-Zverev gen from ever getting the spotlight. Let's see if either Medvedev or Zverev can win this one for their gen.
Yeah, what I'm saying is it's not a done deal or a zero sum game.
And we still have only one king in tennis. Alcaraz is very good, but not "lock-in to beat everyone else at a Slam" good.
In other words, people were quick to jump to the idea that Alcaraz is Djokovic's great rival, but the truth is Alcaraz-Medvedev-Sinner-Zverev are each other's rivals, while Djokovic is above them all.
 

messiahrobins

Hall of Fame
How is he "arrogant", I'm not understanding!? Not a fan of the guy but he is no worse than anybody else to me. And if he is, it's the right attitude to have in tennis. You can only succeed if you think highly of yourself, sad but true....
Smiling in between points when he has done something spectacular. Going for drop shots when they are not on and trying to seem super casual doing it.
 

messiahrobins

Hall of Fame
Yeah, what I'm saying is it's not a done deal or a zero sum game.
And we still have only one king in tennis. Alcaraz is very good, but not "lock-in to beat everyone else at a Slam" good.
In other words, people were quick to jump to the idea that Alcaraz is Djokovic's great rival, but the truth is Alcaraz-Medvedev-Sinner-Zverev are rivals to each other, while Djokovic is above them all.
Spot on.
 
Its the smiling during matches and the hollywood shots he tries at the wrong time which bother me as it is a sign of a lack of focus and like i say arrogance really in the sense it shows he doesnt feel threatened by the opponent.
Agreed. That’s the time he needs to get serious and go into lockdown. He should not be smiling or hitting Hollywood shots especially when he’s close to defeat. He needs to get more ruthless and business like.
 

messiahrobins

Hall of Fame
Agreed. That’s the time he needs to get serious and go into lockdown. He should not be smiling or hitting Hollywood shots especially when he’s close to defeat. He needs to get more ruthless and business like.
He was still smiling and high fiving the crowd when he lost. I question how badly he wants to win. Zverev wants it too much as Federer once said and i respect that more than alcaraz apparent attitude of entertain first win 2nd. Alcaraz is almost reverting to agassi type attitude on court in agassis punk denim days. I hope he doesnt actually turn out in denim shorts at some point... im assuming denim is still cool?
 

mtommer

Hall of Fame
Aesthetically it’s fine and he can whallop it, but against the top guys he consistently gets rushed and misfires with it.
From what I've seen, Carlos can do anything he wants with his backhand. It seems like what you observe has more to do with either a lack of anticipating the opponent or trying to impose a gameplan on an opponent and not always adjusting to the opponent's responses to that.
 
Top