thalivest
Banned
It seems virtually certain now Serena will go down in history as a great player than her sister. Venus might go down as the greater grass court player (although even that is no longer a certainty) but overall it will be Serena clearly who will rank higher. That is not to diminish Venus who is still clearly one of the top 3 players of her generation along with Serena and Henin, and who has had an overall outstanding career with already 7 slams in singles, 5 Wimbledons singles titles, many Miami titles, many doubles slams, Olympic singles and doubles golds.
However when looking back at all did Serena end up having the greater career and going down as the greater player because she really was just a better tennis player as Venus, or to the full extent of their records. Or was Venus in actuality alot closer, or even as good or better a player as Venus overall, but simply could not deal with the emotional aspect of playing her sister in big matches as well as Serena.
The matches between the 2 made a big difference to who ended up with many more big titles. Here are matches between the two that potentially decided the victor at various slams:
2000 Wimbledon- Venus vs Serena semifinal. Venus wins
2001 U.S Open- Venus vs Serena final. Venus wins
2002 French Open- Venus vs Serena final. Serena wins
2002 Wimbledon- Venus vs Serena final. Serena wins
2002 U.S Open- Venus vs Serena final. Serena wins
2003 Australian Open- Venus vs Serena final. Serena wins
2003 Wimbledon- Venus vs Serena final. Serena wins
2008 Wimbledon- Venus vs Serena final. Venus wins
2008 U.S Open- Venus vs Serena quarters. Serena wins
2009 Wimbledon- Venus vs Serena final. Serena wins.
As you can see Venus has the distinctive edge in slam meetings that potentially decided the Championship between them at 7-3. It seems a general consensus Serena handled the emotional aspect of playing Venus much better than Venus was able to the other way. How big of a factor was that in Serena winning 12 slams to Venus's 7, was it a large part of the difference, or is Serena just the better player of the two overall aside from that element.
However when looking back at all did Serena end up having the greater career and going down as the greater player because she really was just a better tennis player as Venus, or to the full extent of their records. Or was Venus in actuality alot closer, or even as good or better a player as Venus overall, but simply could not deal with the emotional aspect of playing her sister in big matches as well as Serena.
The matches between the 2 made a big difference to who ended up with many more big titles. Here are matches between the two that potentially decided the victor at various slams:
2000 Wimbledon- Venus vs Serena semifinal. Venus wins
2001 U.S Open- Venus vs Serena final. Venus wins
2002 French Open- Venus vs Serena final. Serena wins
2002 Wimbledon- Venus vs Serena final. Serena wins
2002 U.S Open- Venus vs Serena final. Serena wins
2003 Australian Open- Venus vs Serena final. Serena wins
2003 Wimbledon- Venus vs Serena final. Serena wins
2008 Wimbledon- Venus vs Serena final. Venus wins
2008 U.S Open- Venus vs Serena quarters. Serena wins
2009 Wimbledon- Venus vs Serena final. Serena wins.
As you can see Venus has the distinctive edge in slam meetings that potentially decided the Championship between them at 7-3. It seems a general consensus Serena handled the emotional aspect of playing Venus much better than Venus was able to the other way. How big of a factor was that in Serena winning 12 slams to Venus's 7, was it a large part of the difference, or is Serena just the better player of the two overall aside from that element.