Nadal at clay is a completely different beast
And nadovic H2H at clay post 2011, being 9-7 is a bit misleading...
As 3 of djoker wins came into nadal's weakest years on tour (2015 MC, 2015 RG, 2016 ROM)..
Only MAD11, ROM11, MC13, ROM14 were achieved when both were prime...
Otherwise nadal pretty much thrashed nole on clay, especially at RG, even when he was half decent...
So technically its 9-4 nadal....
the nadal himself understood that a long time ago...Good man! You are clearly one of the rare few who is a true fan of Bull, as you abide by the morally correct rule - if Bull isn't at his best, it doesn't count, but if the opponent isn't at his best, it does count. However, I must point out to you that it is technically 16-0 to Bull, not 9-4. You made the mistake of simply deducting the matches that Djokovic "won," rather than putting them in Bull's column as moral victories for Bull. And you also failed to notice that Madrid 2011, Rome 2011, Monte Carlo 2013, and Rome 2014 were all moral victories on Bull's part, too. Indeed, Bull now leads Djokovic by an impressive 54-0 in their moral head to head.
the nadal himself understood that a long time ago...
https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/nadal-i-don’t-count-2012-like-a-loss.503437/
Good man! You are clearly one of the rare few who is a true fan of Bull, as you abide by the morally correct rule - if Bull isn't at his best, it doesn't count, but if the opponent isn't at his best, it does count. However, I must point out to you that it is technically 16-0 to Bull, not 9-4. You made the mistake of simply deducting the matches that Djokovic "won," rather than putting them in Bull's column as moral victories for Bull. And you also failed to notice that Madrid 2011, Rome 2011, Monte Carlo 2013, and Rome 2014 were all moral victories on Bull's part, too. Indeed, Bull now leads Djokovic by an impressive 54-0 in their moral head to head.
.the nadal himself understood that a long time ago...
https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/nadal-i-don’t-count-2012-like-a-loss.503437/
Stay butthurt. Djokovic always needs the hard courts or the roof to beat Nadal again after a streak of losses.Nadal always needs the clay to beat Djokovic again after a streak of losses.
Yeah, I agree. He played incredibly well and smart at Wimbledon, almost beat Novak, that's why I'm surprised he didn't at least try with the same approach this time. Anyway, I don't believe he would've won the match regardless, it's hard to hit through Novak on this type of court, it's much easier to do it on grass.
#bullieve
6-0 4-6 6-1Djoko best level is too much for Nadal off clay. Now we will see whether Djoko can do the same to Rafa on clay too? Djoko is his nemesis and he’s also in his head!
I'm a federer fan... So you trolled yourself only
Nuff said xD.
You indeed have either a slow internet connection or slow reflexes.You may believe with your conscious mind that you are a Federer fan, but your fine works on Bull's behalf make plain your subconscious acceptance of his greatness and invincibility. This is nothing of which to be ashamed - indeed, you will one day be extremely proud of your moral awakening and may publish a manifesto along the lines of "How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bull."
You indeed have either a slow internet connection or slow reflexes.
Took you 5.5 months to reply, huh?!!
Yesss!Rafa is backto #1 in the world....again!