According to the logic of your signature, Felix does not need to beat him. He has earned a lot more in prizemoney + sponsorships.
Anyway, FAA should win. He is serving very well.
Alcaraz in 4.
Agree - that’s why I think Alcaraz will win. FAA may find that pressure too much.There must be a lot of pressure on Felix for tomorrow's match.
It is a very crucial match.
Never recover? Isn't he like just 21?
21 yr old losing to upcoming 18 yr old 2-3 times and if he doesn't reverse that h2h in 1-2 years then he will be a pigeon for life.
Are you using the Federer v Nadal example here?
Yes
When Fed failed to beat Nadal on clay in 05-08 period I instantly knew & had predicted on orkut (at that time) that Nadal would win 10-11 french opens, back in 2008
Sometimes we get signs of things to comes, good thing that 3 years is not too much a difference, had it been 4 or 5, would be worse...
So you gave Federer a full four year period, but you are giving FAA just one match to decide his fate?
Me or you are nobody to decide anything on him, his fate is in his hands.
He might even go on to win 25 grand slams, we never know.
I just said he should not lose, keeping edge on those younger is blueprint to success, some specimens have 94.62% win record vs younger guys in slams and thus they are having a lot of slams now, that is the key
Very possibly definitely maybe.But then isn't what you saying almost relevant to any match anywhere then?
Every match potentially for anyone could then be looked at as a career defining moment.
Very possibly definitely maybe.
But then isn't what you saying almost relevant to any match anywhere then?
Every match potentially for anyone could then be looked at as a career defining moment.
If Alcarez wins his first 2-3 slam matches vs Felix then Felix will end up his pigeon for life.
Take this in writing, this is a slam match, not a best of 3.
Most definitely the potential to occur but with random probabilities plus a little chaos I guess Felix needs to just roll with it.Possibly definately maybe?
Most definitely the potential to occur but with random probabilities plus a little chaos I guess Felix needs to just roll with it.
Very possibly definitely maybe.
Great tune.
Such as in the 8 finals he has lost
Ive just noticed Felix hasnt won a single title yet. He has to win something, even if just a smaller tournament to get off the board.
FAA doesn’t seem to do well when he’s in a big match and he is actually the favourite. Such as in the 8 finals he has lost
Date | Tournament | Surface | Round | W/L | Match | Score | Stats |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
08-06-2021 | Stuttgart | Grass | F | L | Marin Cilic d. Felix Auger Aliassime (3) | 7-6(2) 6-3 | Stats |
01-02-2021 | Murray River Open | Hard | F | L | Daniel Evans (8) d. Felix Auger Aliassime (3) | 6-2 6-3 | Stats |
12-10-2020 | Cologne 1 | Hard (i) | F | L | Alexander Zverev (1) d. Felix Auger Aliassime (3) | 6-3 6-3 | Stats |
17-02-2020 | Marseille | Hard (i) | F | L | Stefanos Tsitsipas (2) d. Felix Auger Aliassime (7) | 6-3 6-4 | Stats |
10-02-2020 | Rotterdam | Hard (i) | F | L | Gael Monfils (3) d. Felix Auger Aliassime | 6-2 6-4 | Stats |
24-11-2019 | Davis Cup Finals | Hard (i) | F | L | Roberto Bautista Agut d. Felix Auger Aliassime | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Stats |
10-06-2019 | Stuttgart | Grass | F | L | Matteo Berrettini d. Felix Auger Aliassime (7) | 6-4 7-6(11) | Stats |
20-05-2019 | Lyon | Clay | F | L | Benoit Paire d. Felix Auger Aliassime (4) | 6-4 6-3 | Stats |
18-02-2019 | Rio de Janeiro | Clay | F | L | Laslo Djere d. Felix Auger Aliassime (WC) | 6-3 7-5 | Stats |
If you look at players similar age Ruud and De minaur they are both 22 have 11 and 15 titles.He just turned 21. Does not necessarily have to win a tournament. Beating Alcaraz and reaching the Semi Final is just fine.
It’s just one match. 2008 AO didn’t mark the passage of Djoker over FedAlcarez is 3 years younger and if Felix allow him to surge ahead then it will very bad for his future....Alcarez looks more muscular too ?
It’s just one match. 2008 AO didn’t mark the passage of Djoker over Fed
Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiightbecause it was fluke loss due to mono
actual loss came at uso2010
Alcaraz has announced his arrival and him making a QF of a Slam at 18 has made everyone pay attention. He's going to be very successful in this game I think. Felix is playing very well though and I think will win this and make his 1st Slam SF.
It won’t look bad for FAA at all. He is still very young. And he’s improving every year.
Remember when Federer(born in1981) was being completely owned by Nalbandian(born in 1982)? As a matter of fact, Nalbandian knocked Federer out of both hard courts slam events in 2003(R16 AO and R16 USO). Federer started out 0-5 against the younger Nalbandian. We aren’t just talking about one match; but 5 scarring matches, which include the USO, AO, and Cincinnati. I think Federer recovered from those losses.
How tall is Alcarez?
He is listed as 6'1 in some places but he seems shorter than Nadal and Federer
I wish he was 6'2 or 6'3, he would have been a Bonafide ATG, these days some height is needed I guess
Yea I guess he's 6'1, but that's a good height to become an ATG. I would say 6'1-6'2 is the perfect height.
Alcarez looks shorter than Fedal is all pics, he is 6'0 but being marketed as 6'1
Stats say that last person below 6'0 to win a slam was Gaudio ....in 04....ancient times
His height is an issue. He may be 6'0 at the most. Not ideal these days. Maybe ideal in 1980s and 90s.
Need to be taller today if you are aspiring to be Top 3. Just look at Med, Zed, and Berry.