mike danny
Bionic Poster
imo they were a bit because they were not a facotr in slams either, they were ocassionally reaching the latter stages and sometimes giving the top guys a run for their money. nalbandian in 2004 AO and 2006 FO(untill he retired) and davydenko at 2006 AO, 2007 FO and 2010 AO. also they have some good accomplishments themselves. tsonga and berdych have a slam final each(but they have not been able to reproduce), nalby has a slam final as well. but nalby and davy have done things which make them a little better in a way. both have won masters series by beating the best players in federer nadal and djokovic, something tsonga and berdych cannot claim. and davy also has the WTF unlike berdych and tsonga. discuss