tennis_pro
Bionic Poster
Just a quick puzzle.
That's 1/4 fin.Verdasco, Robredo, Rublev, Schwartzman is the answer to all your problems.
What makes you dislike Nadal so much?Verdasco, Robredo, Rublev, Schwartzman is the answer to all your problems.
Nadal is better than Federer in every single aspect so trolling_pro’s b hurts.What makes you dislike Nadal so much?
OK, you have a point about the other names you listed but Verdasco that day put up one of the toughest fights ever for a Slam semifinal. Tougher perhaps than even Federer himself in the final.The nerve you have to even respond after what the Nadal+Djokovic gang has done with TTW in the last 2 months which is a daily swamp of s**tting on Federer is beyond anything. It's like you stole a car with no repercussions while you gave me s**t for stealing a lollypop. You can tick September 18th 2019 as another successful day of crapping on Federer. Great job. You can use it when you're applying to a new job as proof of consistency. See ya tomorrow for another portion of mashed potatoes. But hey you like Nadal so it kinda makes sense LMAO.
Yeah that's pretty pathetic that he the guy required a cupcake draw each time to get the job done. Nadal being a 4-time USO champion is the 3rd biggest tragedy in tennis after the Seles stabbing and Halep surgery.
If you want to name the SF opponent in EVERY Slam then please don't forget about Melzer, Ljubicic, Schuttler, Verdasco too LMFAO.
The nerve you have to even respond after what the Nadal+Djokovic gang has done with TTW in the last 2 months which is a daily swamp of s**tting on Federer is beyond anything. It's like you stole a car with no repercussions while you gave me s**t for stealing a lollypop. You can tick September 18th 2019 as another successful day of crapping on Federer. Great job. You can use it when you're applying to a new job as proof of consistency. See ya tomorrow for another portion of mashed potatoes. But hey you like Nadal so it kinda makes sense LMAO.
Yeah that's pretty pathetic that he the guy required a cupcake draw each time to get the job done. Nadal being a 4-time USO champion is the 3rd biggest tragedy in tennis after the Seles stabbing and Halep surgery.
If you want to name the SF opponent in EVERY Slam then please don't forget about Melzer, Ljubicic, Schuttler or Verdasco LMFAO.
And the funny part is if Federer played Verdasco it would've been something like 6-4 7-6 6-3.OK, you have a point about the other names you listed but Verdasco that day put up one of the toughest fights ever for a Slam semifinal. Tougher perhaps than even Federer himself in the final.
I doubt that very much. I think he'd match up better against Fiasco but he's still dropping a set, at least. Dude hit over 100 winners in that match.And the funny part is if Federer played Verdasco it would've been something like 6-4 7-6 6-3.
Nadal is vulnerable against big hitters a lot more than Federer. Remember what Gonzalez did to Nadal at the AO in 2007? And then got straight setted by Fed.I doubt that very much. I think he'd match up better against Fiasco but he's still dropping a set, at least. Dude hit over 100 winners in that match.
And the funny part is if Federer played Verdasco it would've been something like 6-4 7-6 6-3.
Yeah, it's his playing style. It follows that someone like Verdasco or Davydenko would be a tougher matchup for him than they would for Fed. And Fed has his own problem with handling heavy topspin players. That's why Andreev took him to five sets at the US Open in 2008 while I know Nadal would have dismantled him.Nadal is vulnerable against big hitters a lot more than Federer. Remember what Gonzalez did to Nadal at the AO in 2007? And then got straight setted by Fed.
Glory hunters? Dafuq did I just read? Is this 2007?Boo hoo... you lot deserve it for being the worst pack of delusional glory hunters on this site.
So many Slam champions in Nadal's USO draws. Just like Slamless Hewitt, Roddick, Safin, Agassi, Ferrero etc. PFFF. When did you start watching tennis again? Did you even one match pre 2008? Or where you like 2 years old?Not as pathetic as the amount of cupcake draws Federer needed before Nadal and Novak hit their prime...
Federer against that Verdasco = straight sets.Well, I could've just stuck with Wimbledon and thrown Gasquet in there instead of Keifer
LOL at listing Verdasco as a weak opponent. Shows that you know nothing about tennis. So much for being a tennis_pro...
But hey still nothing beats Puerta in the final. :*But I'm happy to go across all slams too mate:
Chung Hyeon
Haas
Berdych
Gasquet
Keifer (PEAK and still lost a set to him LMFAO)
Bjorkman
Grosjean
Hewitt, Roddick in their primes yeah so weak. Agassi at 35 super old, yeah. Looking what Djokovic/Nadal are doing at 32/33 or Fed at 38 doesn't seem that old anymore, right? LMAONot to mention from 03-06 he had sh*t final opponents like Hewitt, Roddick and old man Agassi HAHAHAHAHAHAHA how pathetic
Federer owned big hitters. The first big hitter who beat a relevant Federer was Del Potro at the US Open and Federer was 28 at the time and near the end of his prime. He pretty much only struggled against Nadal thanks to Nadal's speed and spin. That's why Fed has been Ned's daddy since 2014 because that's when Nadal lost his speed.Oh, did you spot that through your crystal ball did you?
Good thing prime Ned ***** prime Fed!Federer owned big hitters. The first big hitter who beat a relevant Federer was Del Potro at the US Open and Federer was 28 at the time and near the end of his prime. He pretty much only struggled against Nadal thanks to Nadal's speed and spin. That's why Fed has been Ned's daddy since 2014 because that's when Nadal lost his speed.
Glory hunters? Dafuq did I just read? Is this 2007?
So many Slam champions in Nadal's USO draws. Just like Slamless Hewitt, Roddick, Safin, Agassi, Ferrero etc. PFFF. When did you start watching tennis again? Did you even one match pre 2008? Or where you like 2 years old?
Federer against that Verdasco = straight sets.
But hey still nothing beats Puerta in the final. :*
Hewitt, Roddick in their primes yeah so weak. Agassi at 35 super old, yeah. Looking what Djokovic/Nadal are doing at 32/33 or Fed at 38 doesn't seem that old anymore, right? LMAO
But hey, Agassi had peak Federer in 2005. Nadal has peak Medvedev hahaha.
Federer owned big hitters. The first big hitter who beat a relevant Federer was Del Potro at the US Open and Federer was 28 at the time and near the end of his prime. He pretty much only struggled against Nadal thanks to Nadal's speed and spin. That's why Fed has been Ned's daddy since 2014 because that's when Nadal lost his speed.
Nadal is a great player, but this is a false statement. The quality of this forum has gone downhill since the U.S. Open. I've never in my life read so many false statements or seen this many so called tennis fans trash a legend like Federer. It's really sad.Nadal is better than Federer in every single aspect so trolling_pro’s b hurts.
He shouldn't be mocked at all. That's what all of his haters want is for him to retire and throw in the towel. I hope he keeps going and keeps winning matches and trophies. He's still capable of it and you know this. He sent Nadal back to Mallorca with his tail tucked between his legs the last time they met.I guess it’s time for legend to retire and by so don’t give haters any more chances to mock him. Basel ends on October 27th. There is still time to make the right decission.
Yes. And what's even funnier is that the only guy who actually won something from this was Nadal.He shouldn't be mocked at all. That's what all of his haters want is for him to retire and throw in the towel. I hope he keeps going and keeps winning matches and trophies. He's still capable of it and you know this. He sent Nadal back to Mallorca with his tail tucked between his legs the last time they met.
Nadal didn't gain anything from losing that match. Nervous Nelly Nadal could barely hold himself together to beat Medvedev. God forbid it's Federer across the net from him next time.Yes. And what's even funnier is that the only guy who actually won something from this was Nadal.
Oh, he did. Federer and Djokovic were killing each other mentally in Wimbledon final. Federer suffered one of his toughest ever losses. As a result Nadal has 2 slam titles this year, Federer has none. And it's not like Federer owned him in head to head this year, they are 1-1. Only difference was that Nadal went on to win the final after that, Federer didn't.Nadal didn't gain anything from losing that match. Nervous Nelly Nadal could barely hold himself together to beat Medvedev. God forbid it's Federer across the net from him next time.
Oh, he did. Federer and Djokovic were killing each other mentally in Wimbledon final. Federer suffered one of his toughest ever losses. As a result Nadal has 2 slams this year, Federer has none. And it's not like Federer owned him in head to head this year, they are 1-1. Only difference was that Nadal went on to win the final after that, Federer didn't.
Medvedev played a great final. Yes, Nadal made a few very bad mistakes but at least he won.
Nadal didn't gain anything from losing that match. Nervous Nelly Nadal could barely hold himself together to beat Medvedev. God forbid it's Federer across the net from him next time.
Be honest. It wouldn't be 1-1 if they hadn't played on clay. Yeah, it sounds good in your head when you type itOh, he did. Federer and Djokovic were killing each other mentally in Wimbledon final. Federer suffered one of his toughest ever losses. As a result Nadal has 2 slams this year, Federer has none. And it's not like Federer owned him in head to head this year, they are 1-1. Only difference was that Nadal went on to win the final after that, Federer didn't.
Medvedev played a great final. Yes, Nadal made a few very bad mistakes but at least he won.
Anywhere off clay. The U.S. Open is a year from now and Federer will be 39 years old by then. No Federer fan is expecting him to win that or even thinking about it right now. The next slam is a winnable slam in Australia. So is Wimbledon. The Fat Lady is going to have to wait a little longer.At the US Open? In 2020, Fed is heading into his second decade without a title. If you make it to the end of the US Open, you can be assured Fed won't be there.
I'm not calling anything. I don't expect Nadal to beat the slam record, I gave up on it when he lost AO 2014 final. He really messed it up then. Well, now Nadal suddenly got really close, this is very surprising. Still, I doubt Federer himself is done winning slams. He will probably still finish ahead of Nadal.Ok let's be nice it's too early to call anything, let's see how next year goes.
Luck's one hell of a drug.Oh, he did. Federer and Djokovic were killing each other mentally in Wimbledon final. Federer suffered one of his toughest ever losses. As a result Nadal has 2 slam titles this year, Federer has none. And it's not like Federer owned him in head to head this year, they are 1-1. Only difference was that Nadal went on to win the final after that, Federer didn't.
Medvedev played a great final. Yes, Nadal made a few very bad mistakes but at least he won.
Now can't even beat a 38-year old Fed LMAOGood thing prime Ned ***** prime Fed!
Learn how to read cupcakeSafin not a big hitter? LOL tennis_clown is more appropriate
Prime for prime Nadal > Fed by your own admission...
Anywhere off clay. The U.S. Open is a year from now and Federer will be 39 years old by then. No Federer fan is expecting him to win that or even thinking about it right now. The next slam is a winnable slam in Australia. So is Wimbledon. The Fat Lady is going to have to wait a little longer.
You hope.Fat lady already sang a tune, entitled 40-15.
What do Berrettini, Gasquet and Youzhny have in common?
You judge players by the tail end of their career over their prime. Pipe down LMAONow can't even beat a 38-year old Fed LMAO
He shouldn't be mocked at all. That's what all of his haters want is for him to retire and throw in the towel. I hope he keeps going and keeps winning matches and trophies. He's still capable of it and you know this. He sent Nadal back to Mallorca with his tail tucked between his legs the last time they met.
No, you look at everything. For 5,5 years+ Fed has been Nadal's daddy, fact.You judge players by the tail end of their career over their prime. Pipe down LMAO
What was said about Nadal? That he lost? Legends lose tennis matches. If I said that Federer did everything better than Nadal, that would also be a lie. Would it not?I can't believe a "tennis fan" would say something like that about a legend like Nadal. Just goes to show how butthurt some false tennis fans have been since Nadal won #19 and is now the favourite to overtake Federer.
What was said about Nadal? That he lost? Legends lose tennis matches. If I said that Federer did everything better than Nadal, that would also be a lie. Would it not?