Aestheticsaboveallelse
Legend
Wtf did you read? Your response is for the opposite of what I saidThen go and turn pro dude, what are you doing on this forum discuss tennis players among us armchair critics? Go and play, try to be Zverev.
Wtf did you read? Your response is for the opposite of what I saidThen go and turn pro dude, what are you doing on this forum discuss tennis players among us armchair critics? Go and play, try to be Zverev.
Having a career like Zverev is unacceptable for carlos and jannickWtf did you read? Your response is for the opposite of what I said
Alcatraz is through growing. He should wear platform heels stuffed with paper towels.Grow 4".
I keep reading here that Carlos is arrogant. What arrogant remarks has he ever made about the result of a tennis match or anything else? People here endlessly (and absurdly) claimed Roger was being arrogant when he said he was a "very talented player," as if there was ever the slightest doubt about that.Be more aggresive, shorten the points. Less arrogant about the result.
Oh, I dunno: would calling onesself "Miracle" (then losing badly next round) during a recent Major fit the bill, or not?I keep reading here that Carlos is arrogant. What arrogant remarks has he ever made about the result of a tennis match or anything else? People here endlessly (and absurdly) claimed Roger was being arrogant when he said he was a "very talented player," as if there was ever the slightest doubt about that.
Alcaraz said after he won Wimbledon, "I know how good a player I am. I don't that's arrogance, but self confidence." Is that the supposed arrogant remark or something else? Maybe I missed some super arrogant interview he gave recently.
https://english.elpais.com/sports/2...hink-thats-arrogance-but-self-confidence.html
Think it’s the comments on his rivalry vs Djokovic that make people think thatI keep reading here that Carlos is arrogant. What arrogant remarks has he ever made about the result of a tennis match or anything else? People here endlessly (and absurdly) claimed Roger was being arrogant when he said he was a "very talented player," as if there was ever the slightest doubt about that.
Alcaraz said after he won Wimbledon, "I know how good a player I am. I don't that's arrogance, but self confidence." Is that the supposed arrogant remark or something else? Maybe I missed some super arrogant interview he gave recently.
https://english.elpais.com/sports/2...hink-thats-arrogance-but-self-confidence.html
People forget what it means to be a 20 year old phenom, it takes time to build consistency and experience for sustained high level results across multiple surfaces against elite competition. Nadal was 19 when he won his first FO, but he didn't win his first major outside of Paris until he reached 23. Djokovic won his first AO at 20 and then didn't win another major until 3 years later.
And some of us remember that Boris Becker had already won two consecutive Wimbledon Men's Singles titles at the ripe old age of.. eighteen.Young phenom Nadal made the first of 4 consecutive RG finals at 19, and the first of 5 straight WB finals at 20. I call that sustained high level results across multiple surfaces.
I think he's too tiny for that approach (that's not a troll, especially).less loop, more penetration on groundies, and bigger serve.
his creative swashbuckling game has taken him pretty far...rather than becoming a percentage player, which i don't think is in his nature, i think he should find ways to make his attacking game more lethal a la federer...flatten out that forehand a bit (less bolo finishes, more across the body), perfect the slice, and get a little more depth on the backhand. keep coming to net, maybe flatten out the serve a touch too.
Yes tinyI think he's too tiny for that approach (that's not a troll, especially).
Al-karaz's 2024 is of substantial interest to me, and my present thinking on it
could be Wrong.
good call. he's in the mix as it is, and his athleticism and creativity are absolutely top-notch already. excited to see him on the clay and grass this year.It has been said by others above but what he needs to improve is just his age. Experience is the best teacher. He will learn from his mistakes and get better.
Yes--before his majors spiral beginning at the 2023 USO, he was inhaling the fumes of the unwarranted hype, and after he failed to defend his USO title and his performance at this year's AO, one would think he would begin to see hype does not translate into results at the majors, but then, he's referring to himself as a "Miracle", so I suppose he's still inhaling it deeply.Oh, I dunno: would calling onesself "Miracle" (then losing badly next round) during a recent Major fit the bill, or not?
Less talking / gesticulating / grunting and *doing a little bit of winning instead* would seem a good formula now for the Massively Hyped One (though that has quieted down considerably since his post-W disappearance from the back end of any tournament..)
Finally--historical clarity. To refer to Alcaraz as a "phenom" at his age is patently false and exaggerating this man to extreme degrees, made obvious by ignoring your timely historical reference about Becker--one of the sport's most famous players' feat at an earlier age.And some of us remember that Boris Becker had already won two consecutive Wimbledon Men's Singles titles at the ripe old age of.. eighteen.
Short guys peak early.I think he’s suffering from early success syndrome.
Aka - Michael Chang, Lleyton Hewitt
A decent hypothesis! Hewitt and Chang gave a lotta people a lot of troubleShort guys peak early.
Even being over confident (as shown by him on the court plus lack of prep) can be detrimental and was, imo.I keep reading here that Carlos is arrogant. What arrogant remarks has he ever made about the result of a tennis match or anything else? People here endlessly (and absurdly) claimed Roger was being arrogant when he said he was a "very talented player," as if there was ever the slightest doubt about that.
Alcaraz said after he won Wimbledon, "I know how good a player I am. I don't that's arrogance, but self confidence." Is that the supposed arrogant remark or something else? Maybe I missed some super arrogant interview he gave recently.
https://english.elpais.com/sports/2...hink-thats-arrogance-but-self-confidence.html
He jokingly said, "my name is miracle." Big difference. And being massively hyped is not arrogance. The grunt is awful but it's not arrogant to do it.Oh, I dunno: would calling onesself "Miracle" (then losing badly next round) during a recent Major fit the bill, or not?
Less talking / gesticulating / grunting and *doing a little bit of winning instead* would seem a good formula now for the Massively Hyped One (though that has quieted down considerably since his post-W disappearance from the back end of any tournament..)
But a couple of social media outlets hyped a successful young player (Jannik also is getting it but I'll ignore it zzz) for hits. Hence I must be vengeful against said successful young player even if I can easily ignore clickbait content on x.com should I choose.He jokingly said, "my name is miracle." Big difference. And being massively hyped is not arrogance.
https://todaytimeslive.com/sports/481488.html
I'm not sure if you interpreted my comment as disparaging Nadal for how great he was at such a young age, but that was not the point I was making. I was referring to how hard it is to just start winning multiple slams per year at that age, and even Nadal at that age did not WIN multiple slams per year. Carlos similarly showed remarkable consistency and results at a young age. He won Masters 1000 titles on clay and hard courts at 18 years old, winning his first USO shortly after turning 19. Then, after an injury, he came back last year and held one of the highest winning percentages in a season as a 19-20 year old including additional 1000 titles on clay and hard courts and a clean sweep on grass including Wimbledon.Young phenom Nadal made the first of 4 consecutive RG finals at 19, and the first of 5 straight WB finals at 20. I call that sustained high level results across multiple surfaces.
Yea sounds like he has too many issues to me...His play style is abusive to his own body. I read last year he has some form of arthritis already in his arm. Not good at 20-21 years old.
I'm not sure if you interpreted my comment as disparaging Nadal for how great he was at such a young age, but that was not the point I was making. I was referring to how hard it is to just start winning multiple slams per year at that age, and even Nadal at that age did not WIN multiple slams per year.
You're missing the context of the entire initial post in which I referenced Nadal, Djokovic, and Federer. Nadal was clearly the earliest bloomer and one of the best 17-19 year old male players of all time, if not the best. But he still was only dominant on clay until a few years into his pro career. He was very competitive on all surfaces, but his results outside of clay were nothing like what they eventually became into his 20s and beyond.That's not what you initially said. You said "it takes time to build consistency and experience for sustained high level results across multiple surfaces". Nadal is not an example.
Thanks for this. I knew with certainty of having watched him so many times that he indeed possesses a robust lockdown mode. It's also why matches like the Zverev one annoy me. He is embarassed to not be a showman. But yes thanks for this as there is a stat that confirm my observation.I'm sure there are technical adjustments he could make, especially to the forehand, but without opening that can of worms, I'll agree with the consensus that he just needs to play with a bit more patience and tactical intent. He needs to build points more methodically sometimes, and even occasionally just bear down and outlast the guy.
There's a stat I find encouraging here: When he reaches a fifth set, Alcaraz makes, on average, 10% fewer unforced errors than he did in the first four sets. That's the same as Djokovic and well above other top players. In short, he goes into lockdown mode. He hasn't played a ton of five-setters so maybe it's not as meaningful as it seems at first, but still – he seems to be able to enter a gear where he can avoid making undue unforced errors. He just needs to find that gear faster when he runs into a match like the one against Zverev. There's simply no excuse for the number and type of errors he was making in the first two sets. He can outmaneuver Zverev in the long term, over a best-of-five set match (especially considering how tentative Zverev almost always gets as a match wears on). It shouldn't take a slam final or a fifth set to bring out Alcaraz's eagle eye.
You're missing the context of the entire initial post in which I referenced Nadal, Djokovic, and Federer. Nadal was clearly the earliest bloomer and one of the best 17-19 year old male players of all time, if not the best. But he still was only dominant on clay until a few years into his pro career. He was very competitive on all surfaces, but his results outside of clay were nothing like what they eventually became into his 20s and beyond.
People forget what it means to be a 20 year old phenom, it takes time to build consistency and experience for sustained high level results across multiple surfaces against elite competition. Nadal was 19 when he won his first FO, but he didn't win his first major outside of Paris until he reached 23. Djokovic won his first AO at 20 and then didn't win another major until 3 years later (when he started winning a lot more). A large part of it is mental as well. Game wise, Alcaraz is elite. He can improve the serve and some other things, but the biggest issue holding him back lately has been between the ears. I think obsessing over the rivalry with Novak and trying to hold the #1 ranking hurt him a bit. Fed was what, 21/22 when he won his first major. Sinner 22.
The media hype and pressure that was put on him from 18 years old caught up with him. Now that Sinner is the new chosen one, I think Alcaraz will find renewed focus and motivation to play his game at his best and rise again. Up until 3 months ago, Sinner was a 21 year old underachiever who essentially flopped at the biggest tournaments and collected some ATP 250 titles. Carlos is already ahead of the curve.
We agree to disagree, as I consider losing only to peak Roger Federer at Wimbledon from age 20 to age 24 as being dominant on grass.
Nadal surely wasn't dominant "beyond" his early 20s...losing to Djokovic, Rosol, Darcis, Kyrgios, and Brown from age 25-29.
Less impatience in going for shots. He just goes for winners way too much when he shouldn't I guessmaybe less showboating
Resisting restlessness during neutral rallies first up. Then continuing to better his serve (it's getting better).
See, Carlos is famous for being able to make you play one more ball and hit the most impossible shots from end-range. So the potential for higher shot tolerance is here, obviously.
But when you bore him with silly neutral balls he succumbs. When you strip away his options however, he explodes at you with a myriad answers -- that's his genius.
Getting restless killed him against Zverev and it has killed him before. He has a top class pusher game in him and it needs to be something he can fall back on when his offensive range isn't working. He shouldn't be embarassed to ... push.
As far as smiling goes, I for one hope the likes of Mcenroe stop bringing it up to him but if that's what makes him happy, play better in process, he should keep smiling for all intents and purposes. Or maybe seethe if that's what he wants to do as long as he puts his head down and resists restlessness. Who am I to dictate what he should feel and emote?
Mental health is important. Carlos will continue to be champion with or without a smile on his face, but I'd rather him be happy and smiling while achieving great many things on the court.
He was not overrated and i cheered his victory at sw19 harder than you did but it's true that he has peaked already and hit his celiing.it hurts but it is what it isWhy give context and nuance to this? That overrated mug fluked the grass swing obviously.
No.He was not overrated and i cheered his victory at sw19 harder than you did but it's true that he has peaked already and hit his celiing.it hurts but it is what it is