3loudboys
G.O.A.T.
Teach me!Almost 40 and I've still got it!
J
Teach me!Almost 40 and I've still got it!
J
There are ways around that and sometimes the tournaments can be longer than 4 hours although you don't need to stay to watch all 3 matches in the day. The tournaments are not always at peak lesson times and you can schedule around that dependent on what your busy days are. Good coaches my sons have worked with will pick tournaments to attend that have more than just one of their students entered providing them with the opportunity to watch all of them. As a professional - I see that as an opportunity to review my work and invest in the good will of my client. Checking the results online does not tell you how the matches went nor how they played.
In answer to your question I am regularly multi tasking and asked to switch tasks for not just half a day but for multiple days. Flexible working is a necessity in the 21st Century, especially when you are a service provider in a competitive field. And the unpaid overtime can be a half a day Sunday or like yesterday I logged into work and started at 7.30am and finished 8.00pm - thats a 12.5 hour day that I get paid for 7 hours. I do what is necessary to complete my job.
Hardly an absurdity but I take your point. Rearranging schedules is tough which is why the smart coaches go watch multiple students in a tournament.Sure, there are lots of times it happens and ways to do it, but to request or expect it is absurd unless you are coaching a kid full-time. It should be within the umbrella of the coaches plan for each student.
J
My biggest fear is letting my kid go all in on tennis and f*ck his life and he has nothing to fall back on. Watch "Jan: Challenge at the net" on Prime if you want to see what I mean.lol I've watched it 3 times when it was first released It's a great video to show that a child doesn't need to be home schooled to be a great player even today.
I would be the general manager and bring in coaches for specific things for specific times.
The grip example: Kids aren't stupid(paraphrasing Yandell here), even if you teach them a more old school grip most will naturally move under the handle so to speak once they start competing.
You bring in a guy that's great with foot work, for strategy, for forehands, for kick serves. It's rare that a coach is great at teaching it all.
At the end of the day, it's you and your kid against the world. It's your money, and you're the one driving little Federer to tournaments. The world won't help you (unless you pull a Giorgi) and the USTA might ruin you. lol
Did you see RBA crush Kyrgios at ATP Cup?Eastern grip doesn't cut it any more.
bitter coach detected
Hardly an absurdity but I take your point. Rearranging schedules is tough which is why the smart coaches go watch multiple students in a tournament.
the bitter student becomes the rich parent, calls the shots*bitter student
J
the bitter student becomes the rich parent, calls the shots
Accept the volume argument 100%. We discussed that you don't need to spend 4 hours watching them - your choice if you want, just pick a local venue.If your kid takes 1 private per week and you ask me to go watch them in a tournament for half my Saturday, that's absurd. If I am coaching them 6 hours a week I will find a way to get to see them. If there is a tournament where three of my students are playing, I will get there if I can. If they are playing at my club and I am there I will go watch as much as possible.
Same as someone buying 6 racquets from me getting a better deal than someone buying one.
"Why did you give Jane a free bag and not me?"
Because Jane bought 6 racquets, duh.
J
Sounds like a sensible suggestion and I wasn't suggesting going to see the kids every week. Twice a year hopefully doesn't overly intrude on the diary and as a professional surely would like to see how your students are doing? Like I said in earlier posts I have experience of coaches who really want to see player development in the arena they are trained for.@J011yroger @3loudboys
This actually seems like an example of a great place for the parent to get involved. Setting up a go pro if the other kids parents are ok with it and editing down the video afterward so the coach can view it later. Or even just tracking the match and handing the data over.
Expecting a coach to abandon their livelihood to go watch tourney more than ocassionally isn't super realistic. Expecting them to go over what happened in a match outside of lesson hours seems more reasonable imo if it's made available to them.
we know your role in this, already establishedI'm not rich or a parent.
J
Just depends on number of students and age differences. If you have 16 students going to 2-3 different local tournaments: worthy time investment. If you have the same amount living in different districts and only 1-3 will be at a given tournament. That's still 6-10 /52 weekends a year of lost income. Which stacks up quick if you take any vacation and lose days for HolidaysSounds like a sensible suggestion and I wasn't suggesting going to see the kids every week. Twice a year hopefully doesn't overly intrude on the diary and as a professional surely would like to see how your students are doing? Like I said in earlier posts I have experience of coaches who really want to see player development in the arena they are trained for.
Accept the volume argument 100%. We discussed that you don't need to spend 4 hours watching them - your choice if you want, just pick a local venue.
If you have a student for 1 hour per week that is playing a tournament at your home club or just around the corner locally - wouldn't you WANT to watch them? Even if its just to evaluate how your methods work in a game situation.
Sounds like he's a forward thinking business man and interested coach.A few weeks ago, I saw some UTR 11 kids hitting with their coach. I approached the coach and asked for his number. He gave me a sales pitch and one of the things he mentioned is he goes to kids matches and doesn't charge for going to the matches. My kid is not at the stage yet but I think for older competitive kids it's very important that the coach does that.
There is tons of stuff a parent can do to be a huge help, being an additional coach is rarely one of them.
J
I'd really like to get involved in swim or tennis in this aspect. It's just a lot with a 40-50 hour workweek and commutingI think you should - I have a couple of boys who are coached and I like your philosophies on coaching. As a parent paying for a service then the open communication on development is very important.
we know your role in this, already established
100% - you have my vote right now.I'd really like to get involved in swim or tennis in this aspect. It's just a lot with a 40-50 hour workweek and commuting
Maybe of we all push for workers rights and increased work from home post COVID I'll be able to
Would you have it any other way?I'm the anti-hero right?
J
So important for the coach to see the player compete.Yes. I also don't think I can expect a coach to take time out of their busy schedule to come see my kid play a tournament match. I know my son's primary coach is lined up back-to-back-to-back-to-back-to-back. If each one of these parents expect the coach to come see their kid play I am not sure how that would work and of course do it without canceling one of the other kids.... who also want the coach to come see their kid play.... etc... etc..
This is especially the case when the kid is younger as the coach is more of a technician if I can call it that. The coach will know if the kids backhand needs work from the lesson and they don't need to go to a match to see that.
That said as my son has gotten older we actually have developed more of a team around him and they all communicate with each other. One of them recently graduated from D1 tennis and he works a lot with my son on diet, match strategy, how he approaches the game, etc. He is a bit cheaper than his primary coach and he does come to watch my son play. Note what he is working with my son on necessitates that he come.
I think if a parent is looking to come see their kid play and work on how they perform during a match this has been an affective and more affordable approach for us.
Boo - you have adopted the role of pantomime villain effortlessly.I'm the anti-hero right?
J
I think age is also an important factor here.far less important the younger they areYes. I also don't think I can expect a coach to take time out of their busy schedule to come see my kid play a tournament match. I know my son's primary coach is lined up back-to-back-to-back-to-back-to-back. If each one of these parents expect the coach to come see their kid play I am not sure how that would work and of course do it without canceling one of the other kids.... who also want the coach to come see their kid play.... etc... etc..
This is especially the case when the kid is younger as the coach is more of a technician if I can call it that. The coach will know if the kids backhand needs work from the lesson and they don't need to go to a match to see that.
That said as my son has gotten older we actually have developed more of a team around him and they all communicate with each other. One of them recently graduated from D1 tennis and he works a lot with my son on diet, match strategy, how he approaches the game, etc. He is a bit cheaper than his primary coach and he does come to watch my son play. Note what he is working with my son on necessitates that he come.
I think if a parent is looking to have a coach come see their kid play and work on how they perform during a match this has been an affective and more affordable approach for us.
If JoeDali is Tango, I guess you're Cash?I'm the anti-hero right?
J
Yes. I also don't think I can expect a coach to take time out of their busy schedule to come see my kid play a tournament match. I know my son's primary coach is lined up back-to-back-to-back-to-back-to-back. If each one of these parents expect the coach to come see their kid play I am not sure how that would work and of course do it without canceling one of the other kids.... who also want the coach to come see their kid play.... etc... etc..
This is especially the case when the kid is younger as the coach is more of a technician if I can call it that. The coach will know if the kids backhand needs work from the lesson and they don't need to go to a match to see that.
That said as my son has gotten older we actually have developed more of a team around him and they all communicate with each other. One of them recently graduated from D1 tennis and he works a lot with my son on diet, match strategy, how he approaches the game, etc. He is a bit cheaper than his primary coach and he does come to watch my son play. Note what he is working with my son on necessitates that he come.
I think if a parent is looking to have a coach come see their kid play and work on how they perform during a match this has been an affective and more affordable approach for us.
Its my second mortgageIn an ideal world the student would have a coach, a hitting partner slightly better than them who serves as the coach's assistant, and a physical trainer. The coach should be able to do all three jobs (except maybe as a hitter if he is older or as the student gets very good) but it's a better allocation of time and resources if he doesn't. If the coach is a good coach he knows his strengths and weaknesses and will ask his colleagues for help W/R/T certain areas or have the student train with others to shore up weak points. This is similar to what @heninfan99 suggested but it usually doesn't work when the parent does the organizing.
But who could afford that? The time and monetary costs are staggering so everyone ends up cutting corners and cobbling the stuff together, and what you do with what you have determines how good you get.
J
If JoeDali is Tango, I guess you're Cash?
Yeah this is why the structure of swim is so much better. Head coach, age group coaches, and assistant coaches all common on any decent sized team. And trainers and workout specialists or coaches who are certified as such.In an ideal world the student would have a coach, a hitting partner slightly better than them who serves as the coach's assistant, and a physical trainer. The coach should be able to do all three jobs (except maybe as a hitter if he is older or as the student gets very good) but it's a better allocation of time and resources if he doesn't. If the coach is a good coach he knows his strengths and weaknesses and will ask his colleagues for help W/R/T certain areas or have the student train with others to shore up weak points. This is similar to what @heninfan99 suggested but it usually doesn't work when the parent does the organizing.
But who could afford that? The time and monetary costs are staggering so everyone ends up cutting corners and cobbling the stuff together, and what you do with what you have determines how good you get.
J
Meh I disagree. If you have the results most parents won't get poached this way.The bottom line is you are not there and the other coach is there to watch the match. If your kid wins, fine. If your kid loses, the parent is going to ask the coach for his number and the other coach is going to give a sales pitch on how he goes to all his kids matches.
The bottom line is you are not there and the other coach is there to watch the match. If your kid wins, fine. If your kid loses, the parent is going to ask the coach for his number and the other coach is going to give a sales pitch on how he goes to all his kids matches.
I think age is also an important factor here.far less important the younger they are
In an ideal world the student would have a coach, a hitting partner slightly better than them who serves as the coach's assistant, and a physical trainer. The coach should be able to do all three jobs (except maybe as a hitter if he is older or as the student gets very good) but it's a better allocation of time and resources if he doesn't. If the coach is a good coach he knows his strengths and weaknesses and will ask his colleagues for help W/R/T certain areas or have the student train with others to shore up weak points. This is similar to what @heninfan99 suggested but it usually doesn't work when the parent does the organizing.
But who could afford that? The time and monetary costs are staggering so everyone ends up cutting corners and cobbling the stuff together, and what you do with what you have determines how good you get.
J
Yes fair points - you would prioritise your students by level and number of hours as accept that you can only give so much.Just depends on number of students and age differences. If you have 16 students going to 2-3 different local tournaments: worthy time investment. If you have the same amount living in different districts and only 1-3 will be at a given tournament. That's still 6-10 /52 weekends a year of lost income. Which stacks up quick if you take any vacation and lose days for Holidays
Solidarity brother.I agree!!!!
I think it has worked for us and as a parent I do keep it straight. You are correct it is expensive but at the same time if it were the other way and we were expecting his primary coach to go to his matches there would be expense involved as well and the hourly rate for the coach is higher.
We are not wealthy so have had to work hard to help my son and also cut corners on expense where we can (Like buying a stringer and stringing his racquets). I think the coaching team approach has worked for us as it allows us to utilize the expensive resources on developing his skills and relatively lower cost resources for items that take more time (like match hitting, watching him play, reporting back to coach).
It gets back to cost being a barrier to growing tennis. It ain't cheap!
A parent wants to see you as invested as they are in their kid's tennis.
This part sums it up - you want the coach as enthusiastic on the child's tennis and development as you are.
Right but as we've established, you don't want a tennis coach you want a Federer coachA parent wants to see you as invested as they are in their kid's tennis. If you are not there while the other guy is there, it just makes you look bad. Especially when the parent asks you to teach Federer forehand and you insisted on teaching semi western.
I agree!!!!
I think it has worked for us and as a parent I do keep it straight. You are correct it is expensive but at the same time if it were the other way and we were expecting his primary coach to go to his matches there would be expense involved as well and the hourly rate for the coach is higher.
We are not wealthy so have had to work hard to help my son and also cut corners on expense where we can (Like buying a stringer and stringing his racquets). I think the coaching team approach has worked for us as it allows us to utilize the expensive resources on developing his skills and relatively lower cost resources for items that take more time (like match hitting, watching him play, reporting back to coach).
It gets back to cost being a barrier to growing tennis. It ain't cheap!
It must be done this way unless you send your kid to someone like Todd Widom but he only takes 12 kids at a time. Very view coaches can teach everything a kid needs from 6 to 16 yr. You mentioned bringing in colleagues...well, yeah, of course. This must be done.In an ideal world the student would have a coach, a hitting partner slightly better than them who serves as the coach's assistant, and a physical trainer. The coach should be able to do all three jobs (except maybe as a hitter if he is older or as the student gets very good) but it's a better allocation of time and resources if he doesn't. If the coach is a good coach he knows his strengths and weaknesses and will ask his colleagues for help W/R/T certain areas or have the student train with others to shore up weak points. This is similar to what @heninfan99 suggested but it usually doesn't work when the parent does the organizing.
But who could afford that? The time and monetary costs are staggering so everyone ends up cutting corners and cobbling the stuff together, and what you do with what you have determines how good you get.
J
I've always wanted to ask - have you got a one handed backhand like Justines?It must be done this way unless you send your kid to someone like Todd Widom but he only takes 12 kids at a time. Very view coaches can teach everything a kid needs from 6 to 16 yr. You mentioned bringing in colleagues...well, yeah, of course. This must be done.
And it's going to be expensive anyway you go. My way would be for my kid and it's worked for many.
It's up to every parent to decide how to spend their money and raise their kid.