Yeah, I don't think this has anything to do with it at all. His frames, from what we know are still the same as the K90....I will say this. When he had the K90, his shots were crisp, fast and deadly at time. That racquet was raw. When he switched to the first BLX, that's when he started to not win so much. His shots slowed down a bit and that raw pace we used to see with the K90 just didn't seem to be there anymore. Then the new ProStaff came out this year and if you saw him hit with it, some of that K90 pace was back.
I will say this. When he had the K90, his shots were crisp, fast and deadly at time. That racquet was raw. When he switched to the first BLX, that's when he started to not win so much. His shots slowed down a bit and that raw pace we used to see with the K90 just didn't seem to be there anymore. Then the new ProStaff came out this year and if you saw him hit with it, some of that K90 pace was back. Now, if you've ever hit with the BLX and then the new ProStaff retails, you'd know that the new ProStaff has better power and is easier to generate racquet head speed with. Would this matter much when his customized SW and heft is always the same?... Maybe not, but it can't be complete coincidence that all of a sudden he's hitting again like he used to with the K90.
Anyway, take away what you want from this, but it's what I've observed in the past 3+ years.
I wouldn't be surprised if the PS 6.0 85 is the closest to his actual racquet in feel. Federer used the PS 6.0 85 for a long time so he probably wanted the same feel. It's possible that Wilson made him basically a PS 6.0 85 with a 90 sq. in. head. IMO, none of the Tour 90 models (PS Tour 90, nCode 90, K90, BLX 90, PS 6.1 90) have the exact same sweet feel as the China version of the PS 6.0 85. This is just speculation, of course, based on feel. Most pros tend to want to stay with the feel they are accustomed to.
Yeah, but that has nothing to do with the feel. Once you get used to the feel of a racquet and you like it, you don't want to change that feel that you get regardless of what else you do to your game.I think he's moved on. Once he switched to the 90 you can see over time how his strokes changed from penetrating / flatter with more power to whippy and extreme spin. The PS85 doesn't have the feel for the type of shots he hits now compared to say 2001 when he beat Petros at Wimbledon. Not saying it's necessarily better, it's just different.
Yeah, but that has nothing to do with the feel. Once you get used to the feel of a racquet and you like it, you don't want to change that feel that you get regardless of what else you do to your game.
BTW, Federer's coach, Tony Roche, was once quoted saying that Federer uses a PS 6.0 85 but with a slightly bigger head.
Well, I'm sure Tony Roche has hit with a PS 6.0 85 and has hit with Federer's racquet, and having played tennis for over 50 years, I'm sure he can tell if they had the same feel or not. None of the retail Tour 90's have the same feel as the PS 6.0 85 - some closer than others but still not the same and any experienced player should be able to discern the feel difference.yeah but Roche isn't a tennis racquet engineer. To most people, it's completely reasonable to describe the Six One Tour (PS 90) as a "PS85 with a slightly bigger head"
I gave up on tour 90s, just not what I was looking for ie a PS85 so no good for me. Had to go for extreme string jobs to replicate the feel.Well, I'm sure Tony Roche has hit with a PS 6.0 85 and has hit with Federer's racquet, and having played tennis for over 50 years, I'm sure he can tell if they had the same feel or not. None of the retail Tour 90's have the same feel as the PS 6.0 85 - some closer than others but still not the same and any experienced player should be able to discern the feel difference.
Some will say K90 and some will say it hasn't changed since the first switch to 90 he made back in the day.
Who knows what the composition is. Bottom line is this. Dimensionally, it's the same as any of the retail 90s. Pick your favorite and customize it to his weight and SW. You may however not be able to play with it though.
I will say this. When he had the K90, his shots were crisp, fast and deadly at time. That racquet was raw. When he switched to the first BLX, that's when he started to not win so much. His shots slowed down a bit and that raw pace we used to see with the K90 just didn't seem to be there anymore. Then the new ProStaff came out this year and if you saw him hit with it, some of that K90 pace was back. Now, if you've ever hit with the BLX and then the new ProStaff retails, you'd know that the new ProStaff has better power and is easier to generate racquet head speed with. Would this matter much when his customized SW and heft is always the same?... Maybe not, but it can't be complete coincidence that all of a sudden he's hitting again like he used to with the K90.
Anyway, take away what you want from this, but it's what I've observed in the past 3+ years.
He's using the same racquet he's used since he went pro. The only changes would be strings/tension/lead. Otherwise I guarantee you it's the same mold and same composition.
Tony Roche also once said Pat Cash was the best serve and volley player in the history of tennis.BTW, Federer's coach, Tony Roche, was once quoted saying that Federer uses a PS 6.0 85 but with a slightly bigger head.
Absolutely. I've used the PS85 for well over 20 years and nothing has really come all that close in terms of feel*. I think the closest off-the-shelf frame I found in the past couple of years was actually a Dunlop. The K6.1 Tour however is a nice frame - way better feel than the BLX imo....None of the retail Tour 90's have the same feel as the PS 6.0 85 - some closer than others but still not the same and any experienced player should be able to discern the feel difference.
I would think that to get as close as humanly possible to the feel of the PS 6.0 85, Wilson would have to make the composition of Federer's racquet exactly the same as that of the PS 6.0 85.While I don't discount he's hit with Federer's actual frame, I do doubt his call on it. From the evidence we have seen (actual frames) his current frame is closest to the K6.1 Tour. The internal composition however is a mystery so far. Unless someone gets hold of a broken Federer frame one at some stage we may not know for a while.
It comes somewhat close but the KPS88 feels much stiffer and the weight distribution and/or balance makes it feel much heavier.(Note: I never got a chance to try at KPS88 so maybe that was closer)
It comes somewhat close but the KPS88 feels much stiffer and the weight distribution and/or balance makes it feel much heavier.
I wouldn't be surprised if the PS 6.0 85 is the closest to his actual racquet in feel. Federer used the PS 6.0 85 for a long time so he probably wanted the same feel. It's possible that Wilson made him basically a PS 6.0 85 with a 90 sq. in. head. IMO, none of the Tour 90 models (PS Tour 90, nCode 90, K90, BLX 90, PS 6.1 90) have the exact same sweet feel as the China version of the PS 6.0 85. This is just speculation, of course, based on feel. Most pros tend to want to stay with the feel they are accustomed to.
What a bullcrap you write? He didnt swith K-BLX-Blx prostaff, those are only paintjobs of his racquet that he uses for like 10 years now.
Actually, I haven't noticed the power of the BLX90 to be any lower than that of the new PS 6.1 90.Learn to read and comprehend. People believe that it's been paint jobs and I could care less. What I said is that you could see a power and devastation drop off to his shots when it was painted as the BLX. Either he slacked off for those years or paint sure seems to make a difference. We all know the power off the BLX wasn't as good as the K or new ProStaff without putting a ton of effort into it. That's all I'm saying. Coincidence or not, watch the matches and pay close attention.
But many people are interested not because they want to use the exact same spec racquet as Federer. They would just like to know out of sheer curiosity.Sincerely, I don't really understand all this fuzz about finding the Federer's raquet clone... What for do you want one? His specs might be the ideal ones for him, but not for others, as well as the terms of feel - he might like it, which does not mean other people should like it....
People should focus more on what is more adequate for THEMSELVES, rather on the specs of the pro's....the raquet choice is a very personal thing, and one should only be aware of what he likes, not others.
Anyhow, having Roger's stick won't give you his abilities, and that is all that matters...
Actually, I haven't noticed the power of the BLX90 to be any lower than that of the new PS 6.1 90.
I can get much more pace on my shots without as much work as was needed with the BLX. This was te first thing I noticed that had improved for me because of the slightly lower SW on the PS. This however threw off my serve power just a bit until I adjusted my timing a bit. With that done, power or rather pace on those shots has improved some too. It's not a huge difference, but it's certainly noticeable.
Some will say K90 and some will say it hasn't changed since the first switch to 90 he made back in the day.
Who knows what the composition is. Bottom line is this. Dimensionally, it's the same as any of the retail 90s. Pick your favorite and customize it to his weight and SW. You may however not be able to play with it though.
I will say this. When he had the K90, his shots were crisp, fast and deadly at time. That racquet was raw. When he switched to the first BLX, that's when he started to not win so much. His shots slowed down a bit and that raw pace we used to see with the K90 just didn't seem to be there anymore. Then the new ProStaff came out this year and if you saw him hit with it, some of that K90 pace was back. Now, if you've ever hit with the BLX and then the new ProStaff retails, you'd know that the new ProStaff has better power and is easier to generate racquet head speed with. Would this matter much when his customized SW and heft is always the same?... Maybe not, but it can't be complete coincidence that all of a sudden he's hitting again like he used to with the K90.
Anyway, take away what you want from this, but it's what I've observed in the past 3+ years.
Learn to read and comprehend. People believe that it's been paint jobs and I could care less. What I said is that you could see a power and devastation drop off to his shots when it was painted as the BLX. Either he slacked off for those years or paint sure seems to make a difference. We all know the power off the BLX wasn't as good as the K or new ProStaff without putting a ton of effort into it. That's all I'm saying. Coincidence or not, watch the matches and pay close attention.
That wouldn't be the difference between teh BLX and the PS, that would be the difference in Wilson's QC
Wow. Too think I actually thought he was still using the pro staff tour 90....
dude look up paint jobs.
At one point he was using a mold that had 5 cross strings in the PWS. Since moving away from that, they've all been 4 cross strings and the same density as retail frames for the string bed.
This is the answer, and I myself have said this many times and have heard this from a lot of people also IRL.
I bought the David Gilmour Strat and I am not able to play Comfortably Numb and Run Like Hell with no musical training or talent.