Who was the Best Player/Had the Best Accomplishments in 2003?

[Vanilla Slice]

The 2003 season saw an ATP tour go undominated by one single player. The top 5 players were all within 1200 points of each other and had solid resumes. The top 5 ranked players with their accomplishments are as follows:

5 - Guillermo Coria (3330 points)

AO 4R, FO SF, Wim 1R, USO QF

Titles (5): Hamburg Masters, Stuttgart, Kitzbuhel, Sopot, Basel

Finalist: Monte Carlo Masters,

Bonus: N/A

4 - Andre Agassi (3425 points)

AO W, FO QF, Wim 4R, USO SF

Titles (4): Australian Open, San Jose, Miami Masters, Houston

Finalist: Masters Cup

Bonus: Held #1

3 - Juan Carlos Ferrero (4205 points)

AO QF, FO W, Wim 4R, USO F

Titles (4): Monte Carlo Masters, Valencia, French Open, Madrid Masters

Finalist: Sydney, US Open, Thailand,

Bonus: Davis Cup Runner Up, Held #1

2 - Roger Federer (4375 points)

AO 4R, FO 1R, Wim W, USO 4R

Titles (7): Marseille, Dubai, Munich, Halle, Wimbledon, Vienna, Masters Cup

Finalist: Rome Masters, Gstaad,

Bonus: Most Finals/Titles on tour, Prize Money leader

1 - Andy Roddick (4535 points)

AO SF, FO 1R, Wim SF, USO W

Titles (6): St. Poelton, Queens Club, Indianapolis, Canada Masters, Cincinnati Masters, US Open

Finalist: Memphis, Houston

Bonus: Points Leader, Year End #1, ATP Player of the Year


Of these 5 for the 2003 season, how would you rank them based on their accomplishments as well as level of play? Who would be your best player (regardless of the rankings)?

 

[metsman]

I think the ranking as it was is accurate.

 

[Djokovic2011]

Judging by what they all achieved that year I'd say the top 5 players finished exactly where they should have in the rankings.

 

[Indio]

I would say that had Agassi played a little more, especially in the Masters, he likely would have finished higher (at least 3rd). He had approximately the same winning percentage as Federer, but he played considerably fewer events.

 

[Mainad]

I would say that had Agassi played a little more, especially in the Masters, he likely would have finished higher (at least 3rd). He had approximately the same winning percentage as Federer, but he played considerably fewer events.

Maybe but Agassi was, of course, a lot older than any of the others on that list and his back was giving him increasing trouble. He had to limit himself.

 

[Micheal Federer]

They all finished exactly where they should have finished