With so many ankle injuries, why so few mid+ or 3/4 height shoes?

Casco

Semi-Pro
Ankle sprains and subsequent ankle vulnerabilty seem common in tennis. Although there are some excellent ankle braces out there, I'd imagine that a high shoe in addition to an effective brace is better than just a brace alone. So why is it so hard to find shoes that cover the ankle? Most of the big athletic shoe manufacturers don't even make a mid, let alone a 3/4 height tennis shoe, but they all make high top basketball shoes that incorporate a strap and other means to stabilize the ankle. What's the deal with this?
 

tbini87

Hall of Fame
i don't think enough people would buy them to make them worth the work. if you really need the extra support just go with b ball shoes.
 

HyperHorse

Banned
Mid cut shoes tend to be cumbersome especially when you want to change direction.
If you want a shoe with good ankle protection, I can recommend the Reebok Match Day Pumps or the Yonex SHT305s.
 

LPShanet

Banned
Ankle sprains and subsequent ankle vulnerabilty seem common in tennis. Although there are some excellent ankle braces out there, I'd imagine that a high shoe in addition to an effective brace is better than just a brace alone. So why is it so hard to find shoes that cover the ankle? Most of the big athletic shoe manufacturers don't even make a mid, let alone a 3/4 height tennis shoe, but they all make high top basketball shoes that incorporate a strap and other means to stabilize the ankle. What's the deal with this?

Seems to be at least partly a function of trend/fashion. There were quite a few mid shoes for tennis from the mid-80's till the early to mid 90's. Some say that Agassi wearing them had a lot to do with it. If you've looked carefully at the basketball market, the same has happened to some extent. While pretty much all of the top of the line basketball shoes at that same time were full high tops, and almost no players at the college and pro level wore anything else, the typical basketball shoe now is quite a bit lower, almost a mid top by comparison. Also, there are now quite a few low top basketball shoes, which there hadn't been since the 60's or earlier. This recent increase in lower top shoes may also be due somewhat to an increased premium placed on mobility in both sports.

In addition to the trend factor, there were a number of sports medicine research studies done in the 80's and 90's, which showed that high top shoes had surprisingly little effect on protecting ankles from sprains and tears. The only real benefit found from high and mid shoes was that it provided a tactile "reminder" to keep the ankle in a straight position, which in some ways helped avoid landing on a slightly turned or non-level ankle by accident. However, it was found that in the event of an inversion (a roll where the ankle goes outward and the foot goes inward under the body) or eversion (the opposite, where the foot splays outward), the support of the shoe itself was almost irrelevant to the severity of the outcome. Even a fairly solid high top apparently wasn't enough of a support to protect the joint. A real orthopedic ankle brace or air cast (or a good taping from a licensed trainer) does a better job and I think they figured that if you had any of those, adding a higher shoe wouldn't be adding any additional usable safety. Also, some of those support methods are fairly bulky, and mid and high top shoes can sometimes make it hard to get them inside the shoe.

N.B. Personally, I like the feel of a mid top shoe, and miss the ones they used to have. I recently got a pair of the mid top version that came out of the Barricade 2 and love them.
 

AmericanTemplar

Professional
I think that a lot of shoes use newer technology that makes them stable without impeding movement. I was hit by a car about a year ago and my ankle got messed up so badly that I couldn't put any weight on it for nearly a month. Of course it took several months before I could even play tennis again. After, I wore an ankle brace up until a couple of months ago when my brace broke and I decided to carry on playing without it. Anyway, although my left ankle is still weaker than my right ankle and it sometimes makes a clicking noise when I walk, I've found that it is very difficult to roll ones ankle with the Nike Breathe Cages because of the added lip on the outside of the toe box. That is one of the reasons that I am on my third pair of them and I see no need to try anything else.
 

WildVolley

Legend
For me, high top shoes provide no protection to my ankles and add extra weight. Having strong legs and good coordination will help you more than high top shoes. Even with basketball shoes, they don't really come up high enough to protect the ankle in a roll over position.
 

Gmedlo

Professional
strengthening your legs seems more effective. I could roll on my ankle at a 45 degree angle from a sprint and I wouldn't be in any pain.

I also think that most lows provide superb support these days– B4s are godly when it comes to support.
 

mctennis

Legend
i don't think enough people would buy them to make them worth the work. if you really need the extra support just go with b ball shoes.

Not a good idea if you are using them for tennis. I wouldn't mix types/uses of shoes for different sports. ONly exception is a shoe you are going to just workout in a gym with. Probably doesn't matter then unless you are doing a lot of treadmill type work in them.
 
I have been using the K-Swiss Ultascendor Mids. They are quite heavy. I think I will go back to a low as I don't feel they support that much more than a low does. I have not twisted my ankle this year however. They have been good shoes.
 

shell

Professional
I don't really think they offer much additional protection, and also they are uncomfortable to me anyway. They hit me wrong, rub into my ankle bones. Personal choice being the main reason I would imagine.
 
Top