90s being the golden age is being marketed by oldists who want to show that the world is moving backwards, like all the gods who fought amongst each other and killed themselves and left the earth to the mortals...
But then, the truth is the players of the 2000s and especially the 2010s would beat the players of the 80d and 90s black and blue. Look at the videos of the 90s, players were so slow and when balls came at them they at times did not even try.
A lot of the balls that went past the receiver in the 90s would all be returned by the modern day players ... 90s was no golden era ....It was the era of servebots abd the servebot with some net skills won most slams, the modern day hunters would thrash the 90s players
My God, you are so easy to refute that it almost is no fun anymore....
1) No decade had more all-time greatest slam finals than the 1990s:
Graf-Sabatini, Wimbledon 91: 6-4 3-6 8-6
Seles-Graf, FO 92: 6-2 3-6 10-8
Graf-Sanchez, Wimbledon 95: 4-6 6-1 7-5
Graf-Seles, USO 95: 7-6 0-6 6-3
Graf-Sanchez, FO 96: 6-3 6-7 10-8
Graf-Hingis, FO 99: 4-6 7-5 6-2
Great quality, drama, great personalities! The "Golden Age" indeed.
What about the 2010s? Where are your all-time classic slam finals of that decade?
2) The 2010s players would beat the players of the 1990s black and blue?
Ever heard of Kimiko Date?
Kimiko was a regular top 10 player in the first half of the 1990s but never made a slam final. A classic "pusher". She retired in 1996.
But she returned to the tour at the end of the 2000s and in 2010-14 - being in her early 40s! - beat among others Sharapova, Li, Stosur, Muguruza, Pennetta. Those 5 players won slams in 2011-2016...