DSH
Talk Tennis Guru
Because those were odd ones out. Rafa's had that level of draw 2 of the last 3 years. If it happens again then it's a pattern.
Well, tell Nadal to apologize after he picks up another Grand Slam trophy.
Because those were odd ones out. Rafa's had that level of draw 2 of the last 3 years. If it happens again then it's a pattern.
But even if they meant path an easy path doesn't somehow devalue a slam as they're trying to argue, does it?The problem is mostly semantics. I don't anyone here are stupid enough to think he actually got a draw of no top 20 players, which is what he ended up facing. But "draw" is typically used in place of "path."
The problem is mostly semantics. I don't anyone here are stupid enough to think he actually got a draw of no top 20 players, which is what he ended up facing. But "draw" is typically used in place of "path."
I remember very clearly how everyone was angry that Murray pulled out last minute, because all the inform players ended up in the top half, and there was a clear imbalance in the draw. Nadal, was bunched in with a lot of inform guys, Federer, Dimitrov, Del Potro, Thiem, Berdych etc. As I said, they all had their problems, but they were all there lined up to face him. Some people make it out like Nadal gets joke draws, like it is deliberately made out that way, when you have that list of guys to go through before you even get to the final, then it is a false statement that he gets joke draws....how things play out is not his fault.
Because those were odd ones out. Rafa's had that level of draw 2 of the last 3 years. If it happens again then it's a pattern.
Whether he went through inform players or not, there is this underlying current of accusation that Nadal is deliberately getting cake walk draws. That pattern you mention is not something that has been put there maliciously, if those other said players don't do their bit and stay healthy and be in form, it cannot be used as an attack against Nadal.
Not to mention he's had plenty of horrible draws at the AO and still been in the final playing for the trophy.
Not to me.But even if they meant path an easy path doesn't somehow devalue a slam as they're trying to argue, does it?
Novak is not his problem at US Open. He won 2 of the last 3 US Opens. Novak problem is in Melbourne where he's almost always there.
Nadal hasn’t won a set off Novak in hard courts since 2013. A single set! Does anyone really think that´s magically going to change if they meet in the US Open? Based on what?
Nadal hasn’t won a set off Novak in hard courts since 2013. A single set! Does anyone really think that´s magically going to change if they meet in the US Open? Based on what?
Epicness
Come on, is this a joke? If so, that’s fine.Djokovic hasn't beaten Nadal at US Open since 2011. Not once in last 9 years. And you're telling me Novak is Rafa's biggest obstacle to winning another US Open.
Come on, is this a joke? If so, that’s fine.
This is tacit approval of the Nadal winning 6 USOs... several LOLs.
#StrongestEraEver #MightyLetsgoyellingZiraffe