Those are the second serves.Ever seen 3.0 tennis?
Those are the second serves.Ever seen 3.0 tennis?
Those serves are not hard at all. My serve is far harder and I'm not even a great player. I think some of you in this thread just don't want to admit that much of serve speed is just strength and athleticism. And, if you have a crappy serve speed, you are probably just weak and unathletic. Women serve over 100 mph and there is no way the average string bean WTA player serves harder than I do on 1st serve. In fact, I know they don't, because I've seen them in person. Technique only gets you so far with serve speed and is more relevant for placement and spin.
No offense to the guys in the video, but they do not look athletic or strong. Having said that, I've only ever really seen 1 other rec player with a harder serve than me and he was like 6'8". Most rec players are terrible at serving and you can see even with the white guy in that video that he has non-existant leg drive.
Also, neither transfers his body weight properly. They are just jumping straight up and down, landing on or even behind the baseline.
Good ground strokes and volleys, but they are not good at serving.
Have you posted videos of your serve?
If not can you record one?
Unfortunately I don't. But it looks something like this.
Good point. Isner as we speak is hitting first serves under 120 and kicking them wide to devastating effect.gonna pose a different angle...
the average IN serve speed is probably higher, the LOWER in NTRP you are.
ie. the athletic 3.0 with frying pan serve, can probably blast 100+... but it never goes in (maybe 5%), and we're only counting when it does go in...
meanwhile the average 4.5 knows that placement and % are more important than raw speed, so they tend to hit say a 80mph heavy spin (3.0-low4.0 don't have technique to hit spin regularly) serve into the corners (which goes in say 65% of the time), and maybe intentionally hit a "slow ball" (ie. maybe a kicker) as a first serve changeup... so the avg of IN serves is like 75mph
(ie. like when roddick dropped his avg first serve speed from 150 to 130, to add more spin)
discuss!
gonna pose a different angle...
the average IN serve speed is probably higher, the LOWER in NTRP you are.
ie. the athletic 3.0 with frying pan serve, can probably blast 100+... but it never goes in (maybe 5%), and we're only counting when it does go in...
meanwhile the average 4.5 knows that placement and % are more important than raw speed, so they tend to hit say a 80mph heavy spin (3.0-low4.0 don't have technique to hit spin regularly) serve into the corners (which goes in say 65% of the time), and maybe intentionally hit a "slow ball" (ie. maybe a kicker) as a first serve changeup... so the avg of IN serves is like 75mph
(ie. like when roddick dropped his avg first serve speed from 150 to 130, to add more spin)
discuss!
Interesting observation.gonna pose a different angle...
the average IN serve speed is probably higher, the LOWER in NTRP you are.
ie. the athletic 3.0 with frying pan serve, can probably blast 100+... but it never goes in (maybe 5%), and we're only counting when it does go in...
meanwhile the average 4.5 knows that placement and % are more important than raw speed, so they tend to hit say a 80mph heavy spin (3.0-low4.0 don't have technique to hit spin regularly) serve into the corners (which goes in say 65% of the time), and maybe intentionally hit a "slow ball" (ie. maybe a kicker) as a first serve changeup... so the avg of IN serves is like 75mph
(ie. like when roddick dropped his avg first serve speed from 150 to 130, to add more spin)
discuss!
That would be an interesting stat to figure out.Interesting observation.
So perhaps a better metric would be, if out serves are counted as 0mph, what is the average 1st serve speed per level?
For example, if a typical 4.5 serves 1st serve at 80mph and gets 50% in, then the 'average' across all attempted 1st serves would be 40mph.
What would be the number for other levels?
Your numbers are low. You have to hit the ball upwards at a 30 degree angle to get a serve over the net at 30mph.
4.5 can vary a lot.
Ever seen 3.0 tennis?
Unfortunately I don't. But it looks something like this. Notice how far forward the front foot lands compared to those two 4.5 players. Of course you can't get any power jumping straight up and down with your front foot landing behind the baseline. It looks like they never learned how to serve.
Can you record a video your serve? If you have a somewhat recent mobile phone, it can probably record 240fps or higher.
Haha. I'm not "triggered". Was just curious to see, but I understand why some people may be hesitant to post video of them playing tennis because there are some posters that are very critical of every video they see and a bit harsh in their criticisms.I'm not recording and posting a video of my serve just because some triggered poster on TT desperately wants my serve to be worse than I say it is. If it makes you feel better, just assume it is.
i think this comment supports my theory that lower NTRP == higher serve speedThose serves are not hard at all. My serve is far harder and I'm not even a great player. I think some of you in this thread just don't want to admit that much of serve speed is just strength and athleticism. And, if you have a crappy serve speed, you are probably just weak and unathletic. Women serve over 100 mph and there is no way the average string bean WTA player serves harder than I do on 1st serve. In fact, I know they don't, because I've seen them in person. Technique only gets you so far with serve speed and is more relevant for placement and spin.
No offense to the guys in the video, but they do not look athletic or strong. Having said that, I've only ever really seen 1 other rec player with a harder serve than me and he was like 6'8". Most rec players are terrible at serving and you can see even with the white guy in that video that he has non-existant leg drive.
Also, neither transfers his body weight properly. They are just jumping straight up and down, landing on or even behind the baseline.
Good ground strokes and volleys, but they are not good at serving.
I'm not recording and posting a video of my serve just because some triggered poster on TT desperately wants my serve to be worse than I say it is. If it makes you feel better, just assume it is.
Haha. I'm not "triggered". Was just curious to see, but I understand why some people may be hesitant to post video of them playing tennis because there are some posters that are very critical of every video they see and a bit harsh in their criticisms.
A lot of people try to copy a pro serve or stroke and sometimes it helps.
i think this comment supports my theory that lower NTRP == higher serve speed
those guys in the vid are really spinning the ball in well (though tank top guy is serving bigger, it's still a heavily sliced serve), taking alot from it's pace, but improving consistency and placement.
@WhiskeyEE do you serve flat or spin your first serve in?
but @WhiskeyEE is right about the strength/athleticism - can't train your way into throwing a 90mph fastball (or serving a 150mph serve)... either you have the genetics or you don't.
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." - Carl Sagan
A few points:
(1) Few posters who have boasted about some aspect of their game have ever been able to back it up with proof. Happens occasionally but it's rare. There's a lot of BS that floats around here, so in the absence of proof... you're just another dude in front of a keyboard. Which you're ok with, so that's good.
(2) I don't think folks want your serve to be worse than you say it is. But they're keenly aware of (1) above. If you were to post it and it's the felonious chupacabra you claim it to be, a lot of folks who will note it as so. So, perhaps you're projecting a bit here.
(3) People here love to see video of other posters playing, not so much because they want to be critical (although sometimes that's the case) but rather they like to put a game/face with the otherwise anonymous poster. It's really just curiosity for the most part as far as I can tell.
Anyhow, I think you have the right attitude that you don't care what the posters think, and they'll continue to not believe you, which you're ok with. So, it's all good.
It does beg a question though... Why bother posting any claim that you're not going to back up? It's not going to be believed, so... it's completely pointless, really. But, hey, to each their own.
This is ttw, if you type it,... it must be true.This makes me quite skeptical of these local USTA after work players who all supposedly also post an average similar to the ATP tour.
btw, I don't consider 100mph to be some magical, unattainable speed. At the junior program I played in as a teen, one day the head pro brought a radar run to the group workout. I think out of 25-30 kids and a couple instructors about 6 or 7 hit about 100 and got it in. just a a couple attempts each. The level ranged from kids who only played in weekly clases and on their high school team to tournament playing kids to high school state champ. I hit it around 103-105 and was 5'3" or so at the time.
Many more people could hit 100 mph with accuracy if they worked on it. It isn't about muscling up. You have a ton of leverage to utilize if you have good form and stay loose. It's about letting the racket build momentum more than it's about strength and effort.
Some people minimize double faults by taking off pace and settling into a motion that doesn't vary much between 1st and 2nd serves. Makes consistency easier without having to practice much, but also leads to a conclusion that 100 mph is a speed reserved for the pros. Well, if you don't practice it, then it certainly is.
At the 2014 US Open...
Serena Williams average serve speed - 108 mph
Richard Gasquet average serve speed 104 mph
Kei Nishikori average serve speed - 108 mph
I guess these players would probably struggle to hold serve in some of the 4.0 and 4.5 leagues that the people in this thread play in. It's brutal out there. Would love to see all these 4.0s that can out serve Gasquet. Lol.
There are plenty of ATP pros who average in the low 100s. This makes me quite skeptical of these local USTA after work players who all supposedly also post an average similar to the ATP tour.
Like I said, I was more responding to the obvious insecurity of the OP.
In fairness, not many who've posted here, unless I've lost track, have suggested that 100 mph is a rec average. I agree with you that's nowhere close to right. I think more guys could hit that hard, but it's not the current state.It. Is. Delusional.
I've seen a *few* guys in 4.5 tournaments that could crack the occasional 110mph serve, but the *average* was probably in the low-90s. And this is at the far right end of the distribution, obviously.
In fairness, not many who've posted here, unless I've lost track, have suggested that 100 mph is a rec average. I agree with you that's nowhere close to right. I think more guys could hit that hard, but it's not the current state.
Not really "just like". You don't have to be a 5.0 player to serve that hard. You could spend a few weeks working on your serve and get there.Yes, just like more guys could play 5.0 tennis if they were willing to commit more time, effort, (money?) etc to their game. But very few have the time or inclination for that kind of dedication to a non-remunerative hobby. It's just not worth it.
Not really "just like". You don't have to be a 5.0 player to serve that hard. You could spend a few weeks working on your serve and get there.
Well, of course some people are beyond hope.Then you should teach this guy your method: https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/serving-is-becoming-masochistic-to-me.597992/
He's been working on his serve for what seems like forever. Perhaps you're both in Vegas (I believe he is)? Would be a great test case.
Then you should teach this guy your method: https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/serving-is-becoming-masochistic-to-me.597992/
He's been working on his serve for what seems like forever. Perhaps you're both in Vegas (I believe he is)? Would be a great test case.
Well, of course some people are beyond hope.
Just kidding dgold!
Poor old @dgold44. That guy hasn't been working on that serve for years. Maybe next year is the time!
Highly unlikely !!!
Next year I will be lying half dead in a dirty casino drinking White Russians
Here is good 4.5 tennis. Are these 90-100 mph serves?
As you may know the speed guns at tournaments measure the speed just after leaving the racket. You can add at least 10% to a radar gun positioned at the net.I have a radar gun which I brought to one of our 4.5 practices.
After everyone had a go at it they all declared it must be "reading low"
I have what is considered "a big server" for our group. I could barely break 90. That is my hit it as hard as you can server. Not an actual match server.
My son plays D1 tennis and can hit it 110 - 115. If he hits a body server I just try to deflect it without getting hurt. If he hits one of the corners I just blink as it goes by.
4.5's hitting 100+ ... maybe it happens somewhere ... I guess. (but I doubt it)
I personally think good 4.5's hit 80 or 85 average 1st serves tops ( if anything I think this estimate is on the high side)
Yes 90-100 looks right.
Pros put a lot more 'work' on the ball.Nah man. Federer is hitting 95 mph second serves tonight. You're saying those guys are hitting Federer's second serve in that video? Nah.
gonna pose a different angle...
the average IN serve speed is probably higher, the LOWER in NTRP you are.
ie. the athletic 3.0 with frying pan serve, can probably blast 100+... but it never goes in (maybe 5%), and we're only counting when it does go in...
meanwhile the average 4.5 knows that placement and % are more important than raw speed, so they tend to hit say a 80mph heavy spin (3.0-low4.0 don't have technique to hit spin regularly) serve into the corners (which goes in say 65% of the time), and maybe intentionally hit a "slow ball" (ie. maybe a kicker) as a first serve changeup... so the avg of IN serves is like 75mph
(ie. like when roddick dropped his avg first serve speed from 150 to 130, to add more spin)
discuss!
L
- The plunk your doubles partner serve (bonus if you can bounce it off your doubles partner and hit the side/back curtain... yep... seen it happen)
Then you should teach this guy your method: https://tt.tennis-warehouse.com/index.php?threads/serving-is-becoming-masochistic-to-me.597992/
He's been working on his serve for what seems like forever. Perhaps you're both in Vegas (I believe he is)? Would be a great test case.
Do you not see the irony here... a guy who won't post the video of his serve (despite boasting about its potency and his athleticism) labeling the OP as insecure about his serve? Pot, meet kettle.
I value my privacy and so I'm not posting a video on this forum. Get over it.
Most people value their privacy - that's common. What you value in this case is your anonymity. They're two different concepts.
But don't sweat it, man. Lots of folks here like to talk up their game and criticize others' games while providing zero evidence regarding the former. So you've got plenty of company.
You have a very poor understanding of people if you think anyone would record and post a video just because you doubt their claims on an internet forum. Rofl. Get a life.