The Official Angell Users Club
- Thread starter The_Racketeer
- Start date
haqq777
Legend
I agree. But if anything, the beefier swingweight should help with returning heavy balls and keeping respectable return ball in play so I am lost, really. I would have to see the review.
topspn
Legend
lol..here you go http://tennisnerd.net/gear/racquets/racquet-reviews/angell-tc-100-racquet-review/8355I refuse to believe that TC100 63RA lacks put away power and that it can be bullied. Absolutely and vehemently reject that notion. It's been nicknamed Thor's Hammer for a reason- mine are all 335+ swingweight and they do just fine with high level college players. I speak for V2 though. Can you please post link for the review?
haqq777
Legend
"If you want a more powerful frame, you can obviously try the 70 RA version. This will make the racquet stiffer and return more energy to the ball".
Not even sure if I should even read further than that, lol. I can see why I won't agree with most of his analysis and feedback.
Edit: I read it all and sorry but the guy has no clue what he is talking about. TC100 is nothing like TT100P or any Phantom. I have all these sticks. Furthermore his ratings out of 10 are all a joke. Not to mention it's not string sensitive? Joke.
topspn
Legend
Did you get to the part that any string works as it’s not string sensitive?
I just disagreed with so much he said
haqq777
Legend
LOL I was editing my post as I saw your reply. Its a joke of a review.Did you get to the part that any string works as it’s not string sensitive?
Mirdad
Semi-Pro
I've got good news folks, the V3 TC100 63RA is even better than the V2. Here are my findings. I'll try to mainly emphasize the differences between the two versions.
The original order that was shipped to me was 310.3/31.4, SW 297.
My final specs were (17ga Volkl Cyclone Tour #45, OG, dampener, and added 2.83 grams of tungsten tape at the top of the hoop. I am estimating a final SW of 334. If you take away the lead tape I added, then final SW would of been 324. I got the extra SW measurements for the lead tape from the TW customization document. Therefore, this is my best estimate since I don't possess a measuring device for actual SW.
Keep in mind I played on a slow carpet/sand court and against a much lesser opponent (4.0). I'll be playing this Sunday against a 4.5+ caliber player and will be able to report back on areas of the test that need more verification.
Quick differences between V2 and V3:
However, as stated above, I still need to do some additional testing in areas that I was unable to do so in today's hitting session.
The original order that was shipped to me was 310.3/31.4, SW 297.
My final specs were (17ga Volkl Cyclone Tour #45, OG, dampener, and added 2.83 grams of tungsten tape at the top of the hoop. I am estimating a final SW of 334. If you take away the lead tape I added, then final SW would of been 324. I got the extra SW measurements for the lead tape from the TW customization document. Therefore, this is my best estimate since I don't possess a measuring device for actual SW.
Keep in mind I played on a slow carpet/sand court and against a much lesser opponent (4.0). I'll be playing this Sunday against a 4.5+ caliber player and will be able to report back on areas of the test that need more verification.
Quick differences between V2 and V3:
- Definitely more flex in the hoop
- Biggest surprise is it felt more comfortable, probably because of the extra flex. This is a major plus for me since I have some shoulder issues. Even with the poly strings, this set up was just as comfy as my Wilson Pro Staff CV. Perhaps some of the new materials and manufacturing process attributed to the improvement in comfort.
- Groundstrokes: no big differences between V2 and V3 except more comfort. The ball really pocketed well and the resultant dwell time allowed me to wait on the ball and redirect it with great accuracy. It resulted in the ability to hit sharply angled passing shots as well as deep shots that drew my opponent way off the court. And oh yeah, I was able to it lots of winners without even having to flatten out on the shot much. As we already know this racquet hits a very heavy ball that taxes the opponent like no other! There was some miscommunication between me and my stringer. I asked for string tension of #48 and received #45. I purposely keep my tension in the low range because of my shoulder but I think it would be safe to ratchet up the tension to close to #50. Even with lower than desired tension I hardly hit any shots long. Every time I hit a shot that was close I asked my hitting partner if it was out and he said either it hit the line or was in by a few inches. The slightly less SW allowed me to flatten out on higher incoming shots without any arm discomfort (I was really hoping for this)! Because of this, I added 2.83 grams at the hoop to see how much extra SW I could take. I found myself struggling a tiny bit with the extra weight as it does add 10 more points to the SW. I also found myself hitting a little bit long. Next outing I'll probably use only 1.5 grams at the hoop, or might just add it to positions 3 and 9. This would only add 3 to 5 pts to the total SW. One thing I agree with the Tennis Nerd on is the racquet is extremely capable when slicing the ball....it was like slicing through butter but with weight behind it. The only other racquet I've hit with that could come close is the RF Pro Staff.
- Volleys: Because of the extra flex and comfort, I don't recall the V2 having as much touch as this version. I know when I go to the net with the RF Pro Staff I'm going to get some vibration up my arm especially when facing incoming heat. Not the case with the V3. Drop shots and deeply placed volleys never felt so good!
- Serve, return of serve and stability test: Since today was just a 70 minute after work type hit, we did not get a chance to play a set. As I mentioned before, the court we played on was not nearly as predictable or fast like a hard court. The racquet felt very stable on groundstrokes but I'd rather give my final feedback after my hit this Sunday on the hardcourts.
- The racquet reminded me of a larger, more powerful and comfortable TC97. You won't have the low net clearance of a TC97 but I could probably install 16ga strings to keep the high launch down although I don't personally have a problem with a high launch as long as the shots land in and with decent pace. Keep in mind it's been about 6 months since I've hit with the V2 TC100 and about 2 years since I've hit with a TC97 but I feel my feedback is pretty accurate from what I recall.
- Lastly, I'm more used to the more rounded shape of the Wilson Pro Staffs. I only hit one shot off the frame but need to practice a lot on my flatter shots as they don't feel as controllable as the Pro Staff. However, I did hit some lasers that made me think I just need to get used to the different shape. Brushing up on the ball was a cinch and required no learning curve with the new shaped frame.
However, as stated above, I still need to do some additional testing in areas that I was unable to do so in today's hitting session.
Last edited:
I've got good news folks, the V3 TC100 63RA is even better than the V2. Here are my findings. I'll try to mainly emphasize the differences between the two versions.
The original order that was shipped to me was 310.3/31.4, SW 297.
My final specs were (17ga Volkl Cyclone Tour #45, OG, dampener, and added 2.83 grams of tungsten tape at the top of the hoop. I am estimating a final SW of 334. If you take away the lead tape I added, then final SW would of been 324. I got the extra SW measurements for the lead tape from the TW customization document. Therefore, this is my best estimate since I don't possess a measuring device for actual SW.
Keep in mind I played on a slow carpet/sand court and against a much lesser opponent (4.0). I'll be playing this Sunday against a 4.5+ caliber player and will be able to report back on areas of the test that need more verification.
Quick differences between V2 and V3:
I am definitely very pleased with this initial test as it has exceeded my expectations
- Definitely more flex in the hoop
- Biggest surprise is it felt more comfortable, probably because of the extra flex. This is a major plus for me since I have some shoulder issues. Even with the poly strings, this set up was just as comfy as my Wilson Pro Staff CV. Perhaps some of the new materials and manufacturing process attributed to the improvement in comfort.
- Groundstrokes: no big differences between V2 and V3 except more comfort
- Volleys: Because of the extra flex and comfort, I don't recall the V2 having as much touch as this version. I know when I go to the net with the RF Pro Staff I'm going to get some vibration up my arm especially when facing incoming heat. Not the case with the V3. Drop shots and deeply placed volleys never felt so good!
- Serve, return of serve and stability test: Since today was just a 70 minute after work type hit, we did not get a chance to play a set. As I mentioned before, the court we played on was not nearly as predictable or fast like a hard court. The racquet felt very stable on groundstrokes but I'd rather give my final feedback after my hit this Sunday on the hardcourts.
- The racquet reminded me of a larger, more powerful and comfortable TC97. You won't have the low net clearance of a TC97 but I could probably install 16ga strings to keep the high launch down although I don't personally have a problem with a high launch as long as the shots land in and with decent pace. Keep in mind it's been about 6 months since I've hit with the V2 TC100 and about 2 years since I've hit with a TC97 but I feel my feedback is pretty accurate from what I recall.
- Lastly, I'm more used to the more rounded shape of the Wilson Pro Staffs. I only hit one shot off the frame but need to practice a lot on my flatter shots as they don't feel as controllable as the Pro Staff. However, I did hit some lasers that made me think I just need to get used to the different shape. Brushing up on the ball was a cinch and required no learning curve with the new shaped frame.
Nice review frame sounds right up my street! That little extra flex is interesting so I expect the frame feels like a 63ra frame now, I felt the V2 63ra flex was only really felt whilst ‘on the gas pedal’ outside of hard hitting match’s they felt crisper than I expected.
Look fwd to hearing how the V3 stands up to playing against the higher level opponent, hopefully the stability is good, my TC97 at 330g strung and 325sw is solid stability wise.
pro_staff_user
Rookie
Nice Review. I dont have a TC100 but I do have a TC95 and some weight @ 3 & 9 O'Clock helped immensely.
Mirdad
Semi-Pro
Thanks. I’m going to try a little weight at those locations this Sunday.
1990's Graphite
Hall of Fame
Will we see a tc100 at Wimbledon? Tara Moore using the tc100!
Backhanded Compliment
Legend
The lower tension is likely the difference in comfort and dwell time, FWIWI've got good news folks, the V3 TC100 63RA is even better than the V2. Here are my findings. I'll try to mainly emphasize the differences between the two versions.
The original order that was shipped to me was 310.3/31.4, SW 297.
My final specs were (17ga Volkl Cyclone Tour #45, OG, dampener, and added 2.83 grams of tungsten tape at the top of the hoop. I am estimating a final SW of 334. If you take away the lead tape I added, then final SW would of been 324. I got the extra SW measurements for the lead tape from the TW customization document. Therefore, this is my best estimate since I don't possess a measuring device for actual SW.
Keep in mind I played on a slow carpet/sand court and against a much lesser opponent (4.0). I'll be playing this Sunday against a 4.5+ caliber player and will be able to report back on areas of the test that need more verification.
Quick differences between V2 and V3:
I am definitely very pleased with this initial test as it has exceeded my expectations
- Definitely more flex in the hoop
- Biggest surprise is it felt more comfortable, probably because of the extra flex. This is a major plus for me since I have some shoulder issues. Even with the poly strings, this set up was just as comfy as my Wilson Pro Staff CV. Perhaps some of the new materials and manufacturing process attributed to the improvement in comfort.
- Groundstrokes: no big differences between V2 and V3 except more comfort
- Volleys: Because of the extra flex and comfort, I don't recall the V2 having as much touch as this version. I know when I go to the net with the RF Pro Staff I'm going to get some vibration up my arm especially when facing incoming heat. Not the case with the V3. Drop shots and deeply placed volleys never felt so good!
- Serve, return of serve and stability test: Since today was just a 70 minute after work type hit, we did not get a chance to play a set. As I mentioned before, the court we played on was not nearly as predictable or fast like a hard court. The racquet felt very stable on groundstrokes but I'd rather give my final feedback after my hit this Sunday on the hardcourts.
- The racquet reminded me of a larger, more powerful and comfortable TC97. You won't have the low net clearance of a TC97 but I could probably install 16ga strings to keep the high launch down although I don't personally have a problem with a high launch as long as the shots land in and with decent pace. Keep in mind it's been about 6 months since I've hit with the V2 TC100 and about 2 years since I've hit with a TC97 but I feel my feedback is pretty accurate from what I recall.
- Lastly, I'm more used to the more rounded shape of the Wilson Pro Staffs. I only hit one shot off the frame but need to practice a lot on my flatter shots as they don't feel as controllable as the Pro Staff. However, I did hit some lasers that made me think I just need to get used to the different shape. Brushing up on the ball was a cinch and required no learning curve with the new shaped frame.
scf
Semi-Pro
No, she has lost in the qualies
haqq777
Legend
Yep, I definitely can tell difference in comfort just by dropping even a couple pounds or so in tension. Was never a fan of and played with uber high tensions anyway.
Mirdad
Semi-Pro
Makes sense but I’ve strung V2 at low tension and the comfort level was not nearly as pronounced. I really need to restring, ratchet up the tension and report back.
In fact I’d like to add I’m going to restring a pound or two above my normal tension and see the difference
Last edited:
Mirdad
Semi-Pro
I also for many years strung much higher in the low to mid 60’s but adjusted my strokes to accommodate the lower tensions. At least for myself, lower tensions have produced a much heavier ball and seldom have balls land shorter than desired. It was tough to do at first but through proper technique learned through a local teaching pro I developed a higher level of play. Of course, this is not for everyone’s style and preference but it works for me and many top pros.
I like to chime in, since i like his website
and is a nice guy. Red the review, skipped the video. Usually he likes 95 frames more and plays with 23kg tour bite. Not Sure if the latter is what he used in the tc100 but i wouldn’t be the best set up. Next, he plays usually with 320+ frames like RF/ yonex 330 and he leaded up the babolat he is comparing it to. Hence in the end not his best review since comparing apples to oranges. He would love to comment on it below his review if you would write it down there is my expectation.
haqq777
Legend
Now that I read my comment it seems like I was suggesting that I use uber high tensions, lol. Not the case. I always played low to med-low tensions. Definitely agree with everything you said.
haqq777
Legend
Yep, makes sense the way you described. Will try leaving feedback on there soon. Cheers.I like to chime in, since i like his website
needs to keep a lock on the fridge.Will we see a tc100 at Wimbledon? Tara Moore using the tc100!
I like to chime in, since i like his website
At the end of the day isnt he just a guy with a computer who loves tennis? Reviews are not all that tbh. If your any good and give a tc100 3 months of your time chances are your going to kick some ass and your arm won’t drop off in the process.
I’ve been using it for a year in my tc97, fantastic string. Strings are pretty personal as a few posters on here haven’t got the same feel from scorpion yet they string their frames with strings I’d only put in my opponents frames.
Christian Andersson
New User
Did you get to the part that any string works as it’s not string sensitive?
I have bought the actual racket from Tennisnerd that he used in the review. So I can soon give a second opinion.
I like to chime in, since i like his website
I confess I follow and enjoy his reviews. Up till recently he was playing with the Angell K7 red and was very complimentary about it. He’s been that way about all the Angell frames so far but ‘committed ‘ to the K7 for a while. May even still be. He did say he’s been trying a heavily customised Babolat Soft Drive lately which is such a different racket in comparison to a TC100 or his usual ones, and he’s recovering from a knee injury. So there’s a few variables at play here. I’d love to know how he compares the TC100 with the K7.
I was a bit surprised to hear the TC100 was low powered though as it’s not my experience and it’s also been my experience that it IS quite string sensitive. I would agree that it’s not as powerful as a Pure Drive or Pure Strike though but then they are very powerful rackets but it’s more powerful than many other 100ish inch ones such as Head Speed, AeroPro Drive , Ezones that I have tried.
On string sensitivity for example I am currently trying RS Lyon at 48 but not liking it much. Spin is noticeably less than am used to and am hitting long too much unless I really exaggerate the topspin. (sorry folks as I know RSL is very popular around here - and that’s why I’m trying it!).
I got rather more playability and spin and comfort with my prior set ups of Rpm main and syngut crosses and also from a full bed of Wilson revolve, so I’ll be trying something else next )
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
topspn
Legend
Yeah, power and how heavy a ball you generate is not an issue at all with TC100 63RA. We didn’t name it Thor’s hammer for nothing. It is best matched with a string that is lower powered, comfy and at least a bit connected. I settled on hyper-g 16g @53lbs. I upped tension a bit with hyper-g since it plays a bit lively.
Tordne
Semi-Pro
The new arrivals, along with a coupe of existing rackets. In the picture are 4 x Custom V3 TC95 63RA 16x19, 2 x Custom V3 TC100 63RA, Custom Classic TC97 18x20 and Custom Classic TC100 63RA.
I've never received a courier delivery on a Sunday, but I'll take it. Busy stringing last night so the wife and I can take the new rackets for their inaugural hit tonight (now preying the weather behaves).
From a simple bounce of the ball on the kitchen floor (a ritual in our place when I string a racket LOL) it feels VERY nice. I cannot wait to hit these bad boys!
Classic-TXP-IG MID
Hall of Fame
The new arrivals, along with a coupe of existing rackets. In the picture are 4 x Custom V3 TC95 63RA 16x19, 2 x Custom V3 TC100 63RA, Custom Classic TC97 18x20 and Custom Classic TC100 63RA.
I've never received a courier delivery on a Sunday, but I'll take it. Busy stringing last night so the wife and I can take the new rackets for their inaugural hit tonight (now preying the weather behaves).
From a simple bounce of the ball on the kitchen floor (a ritual in our place when I string a racket LOL) it feels VERY nice. I cannot wait to hit these bad boys!
They look absolutely glorious... making me drool... Can't wait to hear your thoughts and impressions.
I’ve some hyper g 1.18, some rpm rough 17, and some Ultra Cable, trying to decide which of them to try next....or hybrid one of them with the set of ashaway monogut zx Pro or Mantis comfort tour... suggestions welcome!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tordne
Semi-Pro
Yeah they are quite something in the flesh. I have a couple of my TC95s strung. One with a hybrid of Babolat VS Touch 16 and Luxilon ALU Power 16L, and the other with Völkl Cyclone 18L. Only one of my wife's TC100s is strung right now, also with Cyclone 18L.
At the moment it's sunny here, so I'm really hoping it hold so we can go hit tonight. I'll be sure to provide feedback just as soon as I've had the pleasure.
haqq777
Legend
*wipes drool off the floor*
The new arrivals, along with a coupe of existing rackets. In the picture are 4 x Custom V3 TC95 63RA 16x19, 2 x Custom V3 TC100 63RA, Custom Classic TC97 18x20 and Custom Classic TC100 63RA.
I've never received a courier delivery on a Sunday, but I'll take it. Busy stringing last night so the wife and I can take the new rackets for their inaugural hit tonight (now preying the weather behaves).
From a simple bounce of the ball on the kitchen floor (a ritual in our place when I string a racket LOL) it feels VERY nice. I cannot wait to hit these bad boys!
They look fantastic! I agree with other posters, absolute lookers. Looking forward to your feedback.
Mirdad
Semi-Pro
I had another hit with the V3 TC100 63RA today. I could tell from the very first ball that this racquet is a game changer for me. The guy I hit with today is a very consistent 4.5 level player who is very fast on his feet, and pretty adept at returning my heavy top spin shots from my Wilson RF CV Pro Staff. However, today he looked puzzled and oftentimes panicky as he had a very tough time hitting any offensive shots against my heavy ball. At one point he mumbled something about his feet not moving fast enough after I hit a sharply angled cross court shot for a winner. His feet indeed did stop moving but it was because his eyes fooled him......he thought the shot was going out but in dropped in the last split second. This last second dip is a common occurrence with this racquet. Hitting with this racquet is kind of like cheating! I tried wipe off the devious grin on my face as I saw my opponent struggle.
Last edited:
This last second dip you mention, do you feel you overhit the ball? Just wondering as could this be attributed to a dip in power? Or do you hit heavy topspin?
I had this with a few spin frames I hit with, prostaff 95s and blade 98s, these were more open patterns thAn the tc100.
Had a few opponents call the ball out before it had bounced, very amusing at the time.
I’ve really changed my game without actually meaning to over the last few years, I hit much flatter than before , ball really penetrates the court and lower over the net, I still have the heavier topspin option when needed.
I had this with a few spin frames I hit with, prostaff 95s and blade 98s, these were more open patterns thAn the tc100.
Had a few opponents call the ball out before it had bounced, very amusing at the time.
I’ve really changed my game without actually meaning to over the last few years, I hit much flatter than before , ball really penetrates the court and lower over the net, I still have the heavier topspin option when needed.
Lower launch angle with tc97 will be noticeable, some people report tc97 is more stable than tc95, I didn’t notice any stability issues with the tc95.
I’m not sure about tc97 having more power that’s debateable lol.
Christian Andersson
New User
I think TC95(70ra) packs more of a punch than the TC97 16x19 at the same specs in general.
But as read here things like power and launch angle seems a bit
Agree it is debateable. I did have V2 TC97 16x19 in 310g/31.5cm. Compared to my current TC95 (70ra) with the exact same specs and about the same SW I think tc95 is the more powerful.
When it comes to stability they feel about the same to me. I prefer the TC95 out of those anyhow. My TC97 18x20 are quite different though from the 16x19 version, they are by far the most stable out of these mentioned, but those has an unstrung high SW of 305 also. (But same specs as the others 310g/31.5cm).
But power and launch angle discussions seems very individual given all other posts in here.
Mirdad
Semi-Pro
Definitely not lack of power. I hit with lots of topspin with any racquet, the TC100 just gives me that very heavy ball effect. I have hit with Blade 98S and enjoyed that stick but it does not have the power level as the TC100. Also the TC100 is more stable than the blade. I eventually dropped the 98S because the trajectory was too high over the net and it was hard to hit flatter shots from my 2HB. So far I feel the trajectory of the TC100 can be tamed lower than the 98S; but I’m still experimenting. The strings I have on TC100 are a little too loose so a tighter adjustment is in order.
I’ve also owned a TC97 and agree that it is a very versatile stick in that you can hit flat as well as both high and lower trajectory. I find the TC100 has more flex and hits a heavier ball though. I also find the TC100 a little more comfortable than the TC97 although the TC97 swings through the air easier.
The bottom line is the TC100 has the attributes to be a devastating weapon to add to one’s game. I feel this latest V3 is more customizable because you can determine where to add more SW in the racquet. The big question is how well can this beast be tamed? I need to tighten up the strings and start playing matches.
TennisHas-Been
New User
Loving my v3 95, but has anyone else had problems getting overgrips to stick to the leather grips?
TennisHas-Been
New User
The transition has been relatively seamless, to be perfectly honest
Backhanded Compliment
Legend
less spin... that extra surprising D beam spin
CosmosMpower
Hall of Fame
I disagree, I think the TC97 has a higher launch angle, less power/plow than TC95 63RA. The main thing the TC97 has going for it is that it is more maneuverable in the same weight/balance due to lower SW. It also has less power so you can swing through and not get some of the rockets the TC95 shoots out.
CosmosMpower
Hall of Fame
The new arrivals, along with a coupe of existing rackets. In the picture are 4 x Custom V3 TC95 63RA 16x19, 2 x Custom V3 TC100 63RA, Custom Classic TC97 18x20 and Custom Classic TC100 63RA.
I've never received a courier delivery on a Sunday, but I'll take it. Busy stringing last night so the wife and I can take the new rackets for their inaugural hit tonight (now preying the weather behaves).
From a simple bounce of the ball on the kitchen floor (a ritual in our place when I string a racket LOL) it feels VERY nice. I cannot wait to hit these bad boys!
These look nice, how come the two V3's on the right look more orange rather than copper?
Your definitely in the minority of people who think the tc97 launches higher than the tc95 for me the tc95 was considerably higher. I’m talking 16x19’s.
Tordne
Semi-Pro
Interesting. I could just be the light. But both of those rackets are the TC100, while the others are the 95s. So maybe there is a little difference. I’ll check a bit later this morning. And I’ll also post first impressions of the TC95 from a quick hit last night.
Mirdad
Semi-Pro
I also found the tc97 to have a lower launch angle. In addition, I found the tc97 to be more comfortable, but I think I could be in the minority in that regard. Different strokes for different folks......(pun intended).
ace18
Professional
The K7 uses the TC95/TC97 grommets and i used those stringing instructions. I didn’t compare to my TC100 so I’m not sure if they are the same. Angell FB page will give u stringing instruction in the photos section.
Oh, it’s comfy, very comfy
Last edited:
Tordne
Semi-Pro
Good eye. I've just compared the two side by side and the TC100 is a darker shade of copper, more orange.
Tordne
Semi-Pro
First outing with the Angell Custom V3 TC95 63RA 16x19 (that's a mouthful) last night. Given that it is exactly the same spec as the (now) Classic TC100 63RA (swingweight just a couple lower), it was a very simple transition into the TC95. Others have made the comment that moving between the TC100 and TC95 is seamless, but until you actually try yourself it's all hypothetical.
All of the positive things from the TC100 that made me make this jump in the TC95 deep end are present. Directional accuracy, feel and control, all spot on. Both my TC100 and TC95 are strung with the same string, and at the same tension. I found that the weight of shot from the TC95 was slightly heavier than with the TC100. Also, spin production seemed to be up with the TC95. That was sort of unexpected, but it was definitely, and visibly, causing more issues for me opponents. Perhaps there is just a touch more RHS owing to the smaller head coming through the air marginally quicker. Anyway, I'll take it.
Feel, comfort, stability and all of those characteristic for me were the same between the V2 (Classic) and the V3. Touch around the net was, again, exceptional.
So far I am very happy with my decision to go the TC95 route. Next outing for me (weather permitting) will probably be a more serious hitting session on Wednesday evening, and I can't wait.
All of the positive things from the TC100 that made me make this jump in the TC95 deep end are present. Directional accuracy, feel and control, all spot on. Both my TC100 and TC95 are strung with the same string, and at the same tension. I found that the weight of shot from the TC95 was slightly heavier than with the TC100. Also, spin production seemed to be up with the TC95. That was sort of unexpected, but it was definitely, and visibly, causing more issues for me opponents. Perhaps there is just a touch more RHS owing to the smaller head coming through the air marginally quicker. Anyway, I'll take it.
Feel, comfort, stability and all of those characteristic for me were the same between the V2 (Classic) and the V3. Touch around the net was, again, exceptional.
So far I am very happy with my decision to go the TC95 route. Next outing for me (weather permitting) will probably be a more serious hitting session on Wednesday evening, and I can't wait.
Last edited: