Wawrinka had higher peak at RG than nasal

Drop your vote here

  • Yess... Agree....

    Votes: 4 22.2%
  • No.....Ban het shah....lock thread

    Votes: 6 33.3%
  • MuryGoat

    Votes: 8 44.4%

  • Total voters
    18

Sport

G.O.A.T.
Wawrinka RG 15 is the highest level in clay history. He beats any version of Nadal in 4 sets, but could go 3.
MMD_981496_c3b3a86fb81249838d1042bab0ced6be_tenis_final_roland_garros_2017_nadal_vs_wawrinka.jpg


 

Sport

G.O.A.T.
To be fair, Wawrinka beat this version of Djokovic so the logic does follow:

The video has more dislikes than likes, McEnroe showed his disagreement and most people in the comment section agree that Wilander was being dellusional.

2015 is Nadal's worst professional year, pretty much like Djokovic in 2017. Nadal leads the H2H over Djokovic 6-1 at RG, including victories in 2012, 2013 and 2014, three of Djokovic's peak years.
 

Towny

Hall of Fame
The video has more dislikes than likes, McEnroe showed his disagreement and most people in the comment section agree that Wilander was being dellusional.

2015 is Nadal's worst professional year, pretty much like Djokovic in 2017. Nadal leads the H2H over Djokovic 6-1 at RG, including victories in 2012, 2013 and 2014, three of Djokovic's peak years.
I know, this was peak Trollander. Nadal was poor at RG 15, Novak beating him meant very little, especially given he subsequently got taken to 5 by Murray and then blown off the court by Stanimal.
 

redrover

Rookie
The video has more dislikes than likes, McEnroe showed his disagreement and most people in the comment section agree that Wilander was being dellusional.

2015 is Nadal's worst professional year, pretty much like Djokovic in 2017. Nadal leads the H2H over Djokovic 6-1 at RG, including victories in 2012, 2013 and 2014, three of Djokovic's peak years.

Wilander was probably high on dope, he is 90% of the time these days.
 

Rafa4GOAT

Professional
If we had a match that put 2008 FO Nadal against 2015 FO Wawrinka, Nadal would be able to run down more of those winners than anybody else, but I still see him losing in 4 or 5, mainly because of his lack of offense back in 2008. But, if 2017 FO Nadal played 2015 Wawrinka, I think Nadl would win, considering he destroyed a Wawrinka that was playing at about 2 or 3 levels below is 2015 FO level. It would in no way be a whooping from Nadal, he would need 4 or maybe 5 sets to take out the Stanimal.
 

redrover

Rookie
If we had a match that put 2008 FO Nadal against 2015 FO Wawrinka, Nadal would be able to run down more of those winners than anybody else, but I still see him losing in 4 or 5, mainly because of his lack of offense back in 2008. But, if 2017 FO Nadal played 2015 Wawrinka, I think Nadl would win, considering he destroyed a Wawrinka that was playing at about 2 or 3 levels below is 2015 FO level. It would in no way be a whooping from Nadal, he would need 4 or maybe 5 sets to take out the Stanimal.

LOL Rafa of 2008 is a way better player than 2017 Rafa.
 

Druss

Hall of Fame
What's with all these threads "Tsonga had a higher peak than Fed at Wimbledon"....now this one. What's next? Roddick had a higher peak than Djoker at AO?
 
Top