I guess. I don't know I can see A WC. And I guess it does happen. I don't like It.Happens all the time, up to the tournament director. Venus has career accomplishments and will attract more spectators than Riske. If everything was reversed, Riske would have gotten it. Life is rarely fair.
...That just is not fair.
She is ranked 49th in the world. Riske is ranked 37th and she had to go through qualifiers. That just is not fair.
Edit. I see the poster above cited an article saying venus got a wc, but it's not listed in the draw sheet? Weird. I assumed she got direct in based on ranking from 6 weeks ago
Of all the dodgy wildcards that get given out, this is one of the least questionable. Despite her ranking Venus is still the sixth highest earner on the WTA, and her profile is huge. Having her at the tournament is unquestionably a massive draw, and is exactly what wildcards are designed for.She is ranked 49th in the world. Riske is ranked 37th and she had to go through qualifiers. That just is not fair.
Tournament directors have a few wild cards they can get give out at their discretion.
It's usually:
A former champion/finalist that is coming back from injury and has gone even beyond the protected ranking status.
A former draw/ticket seller that is way past their prime but fans will still come out to see.
A local fan favorite that probably didn't get through qualies but again, a special wild card is given.
A player on the verge of retirement.
Lord knows how many wild cards Tommy Haas was getting on his retirement tour. I think he was given one at almost every tournament he asked for one.
It's very simple. The entry lists are not based on current rankings, but rankings from six weeks ago (in this case, the rankings from June 24th, 2019).She is ranked 49th in the world. Riske is ranked 37th and she had to go through qualifiers. That just is not fair.
So like I said.I can't believe we are 15 posts in, and nobody has posted the right answer yet.
Venus was the last direct acceptance. She didn't need the wild card, even though one was originally going to be given to her. She got in directly after Kvitova withdrew.
It's very simple. The entry lists are not based on current rankings, but rankings from weeks ago. In this case, the rankings from June 24th, 2019.
At that time, Venus was ranked 44th and Riske was ranked 54th.
WTA Entry List: 5-11 Agosto 2019
www.tennisteen.it
This kind of thing happens all the time (players who rise rapidly in the rankings being forced to play qualies)
Not surprising, nor wrong. It was the right decision on many levels.
She was going to get a WC, but ended up not needing it after a few players withdrew. She was originally the 4th alternate, but Muguruza, Wang, Vondrousova, and Kvitova withdrew, which ended up bumping Venus into the main drawEdit. I see the poster above cited an article saying venus got a wc, but it's not listed in the draw sheet? Weird. I assumed she got direct in based on ranking from 6 weeks ago
She didn't get a wildcard she got direct entry. And I just noticed her rank thats why. I am sure it happens all the time. Bouchard got a wildcard so did dopey Sharapova. Wildcards are different. Venus got direct entry. Not that I like them giving Bouchard or Pova wildcards either.
If you win 5 W singles titles you'll get all the wildcards you want as well. And, yes, she still fills a lot more seats than most of the WTA Tour.
Bouchard WC (current ranking 112)
MPova WC (current ranking 82)
Leylah Annie Fernandez WC (current ranking 260)
Venus ranking is 56. Why did you single her out as the source of your distress instead of one of the other less highly ranked players that received a WC ?
Hey that makes sense thank you!I can't believe we are 15 posts in, and nobody has posted the right answer yet.
Venus was the last direct acceptance. She didn't need the wild card, even though one was originally going to be given to her. She got in directly after Kvitova (and 3 others) withdrew.
It's very simple. The entry lists are not based on current rankings, but rankings from six weeks ago (in this case, the rankings from June 24th, 2019).
At that time, Venus was ranked 44th and Riske was ranked 54th.
WTA Entry List: 5-11 Agosto 2019
www.tennisteen.it
This kind of thing happens all the time (players who rise rapidly in the rankings being forced to play qualies)
She didn't get a wildcard that was my point but jm1980 answered my question.Of all the dodgy wildcards that get given out, this is one of the least questionable. Despite her ranking Venus is still the sixth highest earner on the WTA, and her profile is huge. Having her at the tournament is unquestionably a massive draw, and is exactly what wildcards are designed for.
If you want to see dodgy look at Miami, who have a long-earned reputation for giving out soft wildcards to players represented by the tournament's owner (IMG). This year they gave Mari Osaka a wildcard, despite the fact that she's ranked 300-odd and regularly gets embarrassed in qualifying. Guess who represents her little sister?
In fact, wildcard nepotism could make a thread all of its own. Marko Djokovic is perhaps the most hilarious example. He got something like 40 wildcards in a four year period - many of them to lucrative tournaments like Dubai - despite never being ranked above ~800.
I see way too many threads about this specific misunderstanding in generalI can't believe we are 15 posts in, and nobody has posted the right answer yet.
Venus was the last direct acceptance. She didn't need the wild card, even though one was originally going to be given to her. She got in directly after Kvitova (and 3 others) withdrew.
It's very simple. The entry lists are not based on current rankings, but rankings from six weeks ago (in this case, the rankings from June 24th, 2019).
At that time, Venus was ranked 44th and Riske was ranked 54th.
WTA Entry List: 5-11 Agosto 2019
www.tennisteen.it
This kind of thing happens all the time (players who rise rapidly in the rankings being forced to play qualies)
...Not that I like them giving Bouchard or Pova wildcards either.
Sometimes we also have players who would have qualified for the main draw playing qualies because they want more match practice, or because they signed up late (the deadline for qualies is later)I see way too many threads about this specific misunderstanding in general
I get the wildcards. Not a huge fan but I get them. I was more asking about the direct entry question and I got a good answer thanks.When you run a tournament you can explain to the investors why you don’t do wildcards.
Yea kind of sad. I hope she rebounds but man she is just terrible this year.She just got smoked in the first round CSN, it was tough to watch.
Didn't she win Wimbledon not too many years ago?She's a washed up bum who's only playing because she's greedy
Her last Wimbledon title was in 2008, which was also her last Slam titleDidn't she win Wimbledon not too many years ago?
My bad, she was in the AO final 2017.Her last Wimbledon title was in 2008
It was also her last Slam title
She also made the Wimbledon final in 2017My bad, she was in the AO final 2017.
That's why I didn't think she needs to call it quits just yet. Not quite all the way washed up.She also made the Wimbledon final in 2017
She also made the Wimbledon final in 2017
No, pretty sure she beat Ostapenko in the QF and Konta in the semi, to reach the final.She lost against Ostapenko in the QF
No, pretty sure she beat Ostapenko in the QF and Konta in the semi, to reach the final.
She is ranked 49th in the world. Riske is ranked 37th and she had to go through qualifiers. That just is not fair.
Yea another poster explained that to me but thank you. Makes sense.The cut off probably before Wimbledon.