AO’20 3R Men’s Singles: (3) R Federer (SUI) vs J Millman

Who will win?

  • Roger Federer in three sets

    Votes: 34 50.0%
  • Roger Federer in four sets

    Votes: 13 19.1%
  • Roger Federer in five sets

    Votes: 2 2.9%
  • John Millman in three sets

    Votes: 5 7.4%
  • John Millman in four sets

    Votes: 5 7.4%
  • John Millman in five sets

    Votes: 9 13.2%

  • Total voters
    68
  • Poll closed .

Pheasant

Legend
If Fed plays well, then it will be in cake walk for him. But as we saw at the USO a few months ago, old man Fed can show up at anytime and play a stinker.

At his current age(he’s currently the oldest man in the top 100), I don’t take any wins for granted. As a matter of fact, I now enjoy all of his wins immensely. 15 years ago, I simply expected Fed to win until he got to the semis. And he always did(23 straight slam semis; which include a string of 10 straight finals and another string of 8 straight finals;
None of which has been equaled by any lovey else in history).
 
D

Deleted member 629564

Guest
He likes revenge.
giphy.gif
 

Rogfan

Professional
If this match would be played on Melbourne Arena which is all Aussie players’ favourite (accessible with ground pass), I’d be a little worried. But it’s playing on RLA so there is no doubt who the crowd will get behind. They will of course still cheer for Millman and want a competitive match, but there is no question who they want to win
 

DSH

Talk Tennis Guru
If this match would be played on Melbourne Arena which is all Aussie players’ favourite (accessible with ground pass), I’d be a little worried. But it’s playing on RLA so there is no doubt who the crowd will get behind. They will of course still cheer for Millman and want a competitive match, but there is no question who they want to win

Is a pity, then!
:sick:
 

MeatTornado

Talk Tennis Guru
He's older now. Look what happened in Wimbledon and USO last year. Went to 5 sets and screwed both those matches up.
Age is weird reason to use considering he didn't lose that Wimbledon final due to fatigue. By the end of that match he still looked just as fresh as Djoker.
 

AceSalvo

Legend
Age is weird reason to use considering he didn't lose that Wimbledon final due to fatigue. By the end of that match he still looked just as fresh as Djoker.

How easily you dismiss the mental edge lost due to age. On top of that having to playing a18 slam winner and 15 slam winner back to back at age 38.

So unless you see Fed limping you won’t acknowledge age has got anything to do with Fed’s performance is my takeaway.

Unfortunately, after a certain point in any career, age has a lot to do with everything.
 

MeatTornado

Talk Tennis Guru
How easily you dismiss the mental edge lost due to age. On top of that having to playing a18 slam winner and 15 slam winner back to back at age 38.

So unless you see Fed limping you won’t acknowledge age has got anything to do with Fed’s performance is my takeaway.

Unfortunately, after a certain point in any career, age has a lot to do with everything.
Age affected the performance in the sense that peak Fed would never have even been dragged to a 4th or 5th set that day. But I'm saying his age had nothing to do with him blowing 2 match points on serve, which is the #1 reason he lost the match. Nor did it have anything to do with him playing Nadal the round before.

He had the match on his racket and he blew it. He's been doing that his whole career. It wasn't because he was 38.
 

jon70

Semi-Pro
The slow court and Dunlop furballs will help John but this time there's no heat (US Open) or racquet tinkering (Brisbane) to stop Roger. Skill will prevail over grit.
 

Rogfan

Professional
Why is fed exchanging so many baseline rallies with Millman? He doesn’t have any upper hand once it goes above a few rallies :(
 
Top