icedevil0289
G.O.A.T.
it's supposed to be funny. Please don't become part of the new wave of easily triggered FedFans.
insulted right now...pftt at new wave, part of the original wave tyvm
it's supposed to be funny. Please don't become part of the new wave of easily triggered FedFans.
Yeah. If both are in form, should be a good one.
Cilic did well for first 2 sets in their WtF match in 17, but dipped in the 3rd with federer raising his level , no ? ( Not really a memorable tournament for me, so slightly shaky on the details)
who?The most talented player since Fed and the 2nd favourite for the title.
So said Gilbert, McEnroe and Trollander.
Fed has no respect for Berdych
who?
Take solace that I have wound myself into 5,000 knots over Fed in slams, but not this one. I think he takes #20 and will savagely brush aside Chung. Hoping for a cakewalk final against Edmund!LOL. I was worried about the match. The poor start didn't help. But it's all good now.
Take solace that I have wound myself into 5,000 knots over Fed in slams, but not this one. I think he takes #20 and will savagely brush aside Chung. Hoping for a cakewalk final against Edmund!
yes, they are in loveNonsense, Fed has nothing but love and respect for his pigeons. Has quite a collection but considers each one to be special in their own way.
Again, how can he do it if they don't make it to him?I wanna see him beat more ATGs in his slams wins. Another Baghdatis slam win seems to be in the bag but I'm really happy. Wimbledon, also pretty cakey but it is what it is. He needs these kind of draws.
Again, how can he do it if they don't make it to him?
And beating ATG's is an overrated stat anyway if they don't play well. Unless you believe beating a sub par Djokovic at 2013 Wimb was more difficult than beating an on-fire Roddick at 2009 Wimb. Or the most recent example, beating a sub par Nadal at 2015 FO was more difficult than beating an on-fire Wawrinka at the same event.
Nonsense. They contributed together at organizing the Laver Cup last year.Fed has no respect for Berdych
Well, yeah, Tomas is gonna kiss that ass.Nonsense. They contributed together at organizing the Laver Cup last year.
Funny, how he collapsed against Nishikori too at the USO and also Wawrinka at the FO after not taking his chances.But when they do make it to him, like Djokovic did in 15 at all those big events, AO 16, Wimby 14, he can't find a way over the hurdle, he sneaked in a win here and there like AO 17, 12 Wimby but more times than not he just can't find a way, unless they are out of the tournament he has no problem to win it. That's All, I want him to show the GOAT quality that people talks about, but he hasn't showed it against ATG rivals.
Wimby 13, I'd give credit to Murray. He played great, I don't know why we should just look at djokovic. USO 13, no excuses, it's mostly you guys who wants to find an excuse to bring down Nadals win, but Djokovic didn't take his chances in that 3rd set and Nadal stormed the weather. He was the better player. If Djokovic has those opportunities in the 3rd set against any other player, he takes it. But that is what you people forget. You just look at one player. Tennis consists of two players.
Number of slams won against ATG: Federer 8 or 9 and Djokovic also 9.But when they do make it to him, like Djokovic did in 15 at all those big events, AO 16, Wimby 14, he can't find a way over the hurdle, he sneaked in a win here and there like AO 17, 12 Wimby but more times than not he just can't find a way, unless they are out of the tournament he has no problem to win it. That's All, I want him to show the GOAT quality that people talks about, but he hasn't showed it against ATG rivals.
Wimby 13, I'd give credit to Murray. He played great, I don't know why we should just look at djokovic. USO 13, no excuses, it's mostly you guys who wants to find an excuse to bring down Nadals win, but Djokovic didn't take his chances in that 3rd set and Nadal stormed the weather. He was the better player. If Djokovic has those opportunities in the 3rd set against any other player, he takes it. But that is what you people forget. You just look at one player. Tennis consists of two players.
How many did he hit in sets 2 and 3?Does anyone think fed's having back issues? I was shocked at the DFs and his average first speed.
Because some people understand that reaching a Slam semi at 36 is pretty historic?how the **** can this topic have alredy 32 pages?
Because some people understand that reaching a Slam semi at 36 is pretty historic?
2nd set was close if you watched it but yeah Gasquet loses a lot to Federer. Have any other great insights?Just like Federer kicked Gasquet’s @SS.
Cilic looked good for the 1st 2 sets vs Pospisil, handled Sousa easily, looked good in parts vs PCB. (dunno about the Harrison match)
But he's had his share of UEs.
Now you're laughing... A few minutes ago you were super angry
its prehistoryc - lets just forget Federosaurus... it seems he brings the ice age in the draws - again he can be lucky that all good players are frozen and out of Ao. Except Chung and Cilic.Because some people understand that reaching a Slam semi at 36 is pretty historic?
Don't diss the pink...even Vegeta had a pink shirt.
And Fed has to have a bad ground game.
The win over Fed at the USO is increasingly looking like a once off
That person,is a lost cause but tbh what defines an atg? Fed beat Sampras, though he didn't go on to win the title, but Sampras would most certainly be considered an atg or one of the greatest. Iirc fed beat agassi as well to win 1 or 2 slams, is he not considered an atg? People cannot say old man agassi and then claim that 36 fed plays better than 27 year old. People also forget that feds generation was not Novak Murray etc. He was above his,generation and still managed to stay competitive in the next two and somehow that is being used against himFunny, how he collapsed against Nishikori too at the USO and also Wawrinka at the FO after not taking his chances.
Don't act like only Nadal can beat him when Djokovic is not converting on his chances. The USO 2013 talk was just in response to people saying that Nadal had it much harder than Federer, when it's not even true.
And big deal, he lost some close matches against ATG players while past his prime. It's better than to not get over the hump against lesser players like Murray, Wawrinka and Nishikori.
And just so you know, it is easy if you are Djokovic and at your peak to get over the hump against an older ATG not in his prime anymore than the other way around.
It shows that if they are not playing well, they can't make it to Federer, while Federer even when not playing well can make it to them.
Instead of trashing Fed, that person should be thankful Fed decided to stick around after 2012 to inflate Djokovic's number of ATG wins, otherwise Djokovic would have won his last 7 slams without facing a single ATGThat person,is a lost cause but tbh what defines an atg? Fed beat Sampras, though he didn't go on to win the title, but Sampras would most certainly be considered an atg or one of the greatest. Iirc fed beat agassi as well to win 1 or 2 slams, is he not considered an atg? People cannot say old man agassi and then claim that 36 fed plays better than 27 year old. People also forget that feds generation was not Novak Murray etc. He was above his,generation and still managed to stay competitive in the next two and somehow that is being used against him
He is like a shepherd with is flock. On a good day he remembers all their names, and when things get lonely he knows he can rely on one of them to provide sexy gratification (like last night.)Nonsense, Fed has nothing but love and respect for his pigeons. Has quite a collection but considers each one to be special in their own way.
I mean it is really interesting what fed's legacy would have been regarded if he hung it up in 2012 like most expected him to. at the very least he finally got a chance to make a dent to that h2h against nadal.That person should be thankful Fed decided to stick around after 2012 to inflate Djokovic's number of ATG wins, otherwise Djokovic would have won his last 7 slams without facing a single ATG
Now you understand Nadal's pain.Instead of trashing Fed, that person should be thankful Fed decided to stick around after 2012 to inflate Djokovic's number of ATG wins, otherwise Djokovic would have won his last 7 slams without facing a single ATG
poor Berdych...got up, watched every point of the first set on my recording..saw another Berdych choke and fast forwarded my way through the rest...I don't know how he doesn't break a lot of equipment and anything else in his way after these moments
Fed did well that he decided to play. Defeated Nadal again in a slam final and won 5 in a row against him for the first time. Not to mention a record 8th Wimb title and still has a chance to win slam number 20.I mean it is really interesting what fed's legacy would have been regarded if he hung it up in 2012 like most expected him to. at the very least he finally got a chance to make a dent to that h2h against nadal.
Fed did well that he decided to play. Defeated Nadal again in a slam final and won 5 in a row against him for the first time. Not to mention a record 8th Wimb title and still has a chance to win slam number 20.
I mean it is really interesting what fed's legacy would have been regarded if he hung it up in 2012 like most expected him to. at the very least he finally got a chance to make a dent to that h2h against nadal.
true, I think it was 2013 that really killed that h2h because they kept meeting and iirc it was not a good look given the back issues. they also met a few times in 2014 and I don't think fed won any of those meetings. I'd say the one thing 2017 has is that slam win. 2012 has fed winning over nadal iirc at IW, and other tournaments but it would take 10 years for fed to win another slam again from the last time he won, iirc 2007 which is very interesting.Saw a tweet that since 2-4 in the first set Fed went 55-18 in W-UE
The H2H difference in 2012 was actually the same as it is now. But of course given recency bias and all that, what happened in 2017 obviously favours Fed a lot.
Ha! Ha! Pretty historic indeed. May Federer continue to make history.
Make that 3, and if Nadal is injured come May, Fed will make a surprise appearance at the French as well.He will win at least 2 slams again this year!
Is this an old post from Montreal or the USO last year?Does anyone think fed's having back issues? I was shocked at the DFs and his average first speed.
Fed has gears and plays about as well as he needs to. Yesterday's match I don't think he got out of third gear. And he's running an 8 speed ZF transmission mated to a 600hp V10. Chung will push him harder. But not enough I think to win. Cilic could go down to Edmund, IMO.Good win by Fed, but honestly I did not observe his performance as so good some people state here. What I saw was a Berdych imploding and making his classic act of mug. Federer played well after that awful start, but Berd helped a bit.
Now, for now I dont see Chung as a menace, in an hypotetical final though Cilic may be really dangerous